Skip to main content
Log in

Interest group representation on government committees in Kenya

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Interest Groups & Advocacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business associations engage in dialogue with policy makers—and sometimes succeed in influencing policy outcomes. One strategy—largely overlooked by researchers—involves seeking appointment to government boards and committees. This is an important omission since many committees review, draft and implement policies and regulations. Securing representation on government committees could thus lead to considerable influence but little is known about the extent to which interest groups seek such appointments. And very little is known about dialogue in developing countries, especially those that seek a consensual rather than an adversarial approach to policy formulation. This research, based on desk research of government committee membership and interviews with business associations, thus addresses two gaps. It has been undertaken in a developing country, Kenya, since there is a relatively small number of interest groups compared to other countries of a similar population. This research focuses on the efforts of interest groups, and business groups in particular, to place nominees on government committees. This article highlights the level of regulatory activity in Kenya effectively delegated to government boards and committees and demonstrates the apparent success of business associations in securing participation in a majority of the committees with a regulatory function. It argues, however, that interest groups could be more professional and more strategic when they are represented on government committees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agunda, W.O. 2018. Expectations of integrity in the public office in Kenya, In: London conference: The construction of public office and the pursuit of integrity, London, 4 Jul.

  • BAF. 2020. Supporting dialogue and advocacy in Kenya: fifteen years of lessons, Nairobi: Business Advocacy Fund

  • Binderkrantz, A.S., and P.M. Christiansen. 2015. From classic to modern corporatism. interest group representation in Danish public committees in 1975 and 2010. Journal of European Public Policy 22: 1022–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.B. 2008. The politics of representation on government advisory committees. Political Research Quarterly 61 (4): 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, L., and R. Lubensky. 2009. Appointments to boards and committees via lottery, a pathway to fairness and diversity. Journal of Public Affairs 9: 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A.W. 2014. Getting a seat at the table: capital, capture and expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics 37 (5): 976–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, N., P. Lewis, R. Mortimer, et al. 1999. Politics and society in contemporary Africa, 3rd. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, P.M., A.S. Nørgaard, H. Rommetvedt, et al. 2010. Varieties of democracy: interest groups and corporatist committees in Scandinavian policy making. Voluntas 21: 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (undated) Civil participation in the decision-making process: the code of good practice, Strasbourg: Council of Europe

  • de Stefano, V. 2021. Not as simple as it seems the ILO and the personal scope of the international labour standards. International Labour Review. 160 (3): 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2012. Who lobbies the European union? national interest groups in a multilevel polity. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (7): 969–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink-Hafner, D., and A. Krašovec. 2005. Is consultation everything? the influence of interest groups on parliamentary working bodies in Slovenia. Czech Sociological Review 41 (3): 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraussen, B., J. Beyers, and T. Donas. 2015. The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness: institutionalised interest group access to advisory councils. Political Studies 63 (3): 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. 2021. African approaches to dialogue and advocacy. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs, ed. P. Harris, A. Bitonti, C.S. Fleisher, and A. Skorkjaer Bindekrantz. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D., and M. Githinji. 2016. Business associations in Kenya: the success factors. Journal of Public Affairs 16 (2): 162–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A.G., and W.A. Maloney. 2007. Democracy and interest groups: enhancing participation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kimenyi, M.S., and A. Datta. 2011. Think tanks in sub Saharan Africa: how the political landscape has influenced their origins. London: ODI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuada, J. 2015. Private enterprise led economic development in sub-Saharan Africa. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lijhart, A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: government forms and performance in thirty six countries 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, C. 2008. Brussels versus the beltway: advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W.A., G. Jordan, and A.M. Mclaughlin. 1994. Interest groups and public policy: the insider/ outsider model revisited. Journal of Public Policy 9: 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, C. 2013. They are not my people: Barack Obama on lobbying and lobbyists. Journal of Public Affairs 13 (3): 308–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, J. 2014. EU Commission expert groups: between inclusive and effective policy-making. In Expertise and Democacy, ed. Catherine Holst. Oslo: Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M. 2012. Contemporary policy analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obang’o, S.O. 2013. Particularistic exchanges and pacts of domination in Africa: examining how patronage appointments may have increased resistance to public sector reforms in Kenya. International Public Management Review 14 (1): 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2021. Lobbying in the 21st century: transparency, integrity and access. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A., and V. Gross. 2015. Biased access? Exploring selection to advisory committees. European Political Science Review 7 (3): 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TI. 2015. International standards for lobbying regulation: towards greater transparency, integrity and participation. Berlin: Transparency International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, D. 2021. Court declares President Kenyatta's parastatal appointments unconstitutional, The Citizen, 21 May [Online] available at: iga.fyi/cit2105. Accessed: 27 May 2021.

  • Watta, D. 2021. Why it is critical to regulate how board directors are picked, work, [Online] available at: iga.fyi/bd2106, Accessed: 21 Jun 2021.

  • Wiredu, K. 2015. Democracy and consensus in African traditional politics, [Online] available at: https://them.polylog.org/2/fwk-en.htm, Accessed: 10 June 2015

  • World Bank. 2005. Building the capacity of business membership organisations 2nd Edn. Washington: World Bank & IFC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Irwin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irwin, D., Kyande, M. Interest group representation on government committees in Kenya. Int Groups Adv 11, 315–332 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-021-00149-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-021-00149-6

Keywords