No borders, no bias? Comparing advocacy group populations at the national and transnational levels
Why are some advocacy group populations biased towards business interest representatives? In this paper, we assess an underexplored source of variation in advocacy populations, namely the governance level at which advocacy populations are located. More precisely, we analyse whether national advocacy group populations are more likely to contain relatively large proportions of business interest associations compared to transnational advocacy group populations. We examine three competing hypotheses: (1) biases are stronger at the national level than the global level, (2) biases are more pronounced at the global level than the national level and (3) no differences emerge in business mobilization across the national and transnational levels. We test our hypotheses based on a novel dataset of national, European Union (EU) and global advocacy group populations. Our results indicate that the global level is different from the EU and national levels, in that it contains relatively low proportions of business interest representatives.
KeywordsAdvocacy groups Interest groups INGOs Business bias Comparative politics
Funding was provided by Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Grant No. 451-12-017).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Balme, R., and D. Chabanet. 2008. European governance and democracy: Power and protest in the EU. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Barnett, M., and M. Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Dellmuth, L.M., and E.A. Bloodgood. 2019. Advocacy group effects in global governance: Populations, strategies, and political opportunity structures. Interest Groups and Advocacy, this Special Issue.Google Scholar
- Halpin, D., and G. Jordan (eds.). 2012. The scale of interest organization in democratic politics: Data and research methods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Klüver, H. 2013. Lobbying in the European Union: interest groups, lobbying coalitions, and policy change. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kohler-Koch, B., Quittkat, C., and Kurczewska, U. 2013. Interest intermediation in the European Union revisited: Report on a survey study. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES). Working Paper number 151.Google Scholar
- Kriesi, H. 2004. Political context and opportunity. In The Blackwell companion to social movements, ed. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 67–90. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Neuendorf, K.A. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Pedersen, H.H., D. Halpin, and A. Rasmussen. 2015. Who gives evidence to parliamentary committees? A comparative investigation of the impact ofinstitutions on external actor involvement in parliamentary committee work. Journal of Legislative Studies 21 (4).Google Scholar
- Saurugger, S. 2013. France. In Handbook of Business Interest Associations, firm size and governance: A comparative analytical approach, ed. F. Traxler and G. Huemer, 121. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Steffek, J., C. Kissling, and P. Nanz (eds.). (2007). Civil society participation in European and global governance: A cure for the democratic deficit? Springer.Google Scholar
- Stroup, S.S., and W.H. Wong. 2017. The authority trap: Strategic choices of International NGOs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Woll, C. 2008. Firm interests: How governments shape business lobbying on global trade. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Woll, C. 2009. The demise of statism? Associations and the transformation of interest intermediation in France. In The French fifth republic at fifty: Beyond stereotypes, ed. S. Brouard, A.M. Appleton, and A.G. Mazur. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar