Dynamic state interest group systems: a new look with new data
- 35 Downloads
Existing data sets on state interest group systems tend to be either cross-sectional (observations for only 1 year) or panel-style (observations of 2 years about a decade apart). In this paper, I describe a new data set based on raw counts of interest groups and organizations lobbying in the states collected by the National Institute for Money in State Politics, data which are observed annually from 2006 to 2015. After several years of careful coding, I present initial analyses of this state interest group data broken out by economic sector (based on National Center for Economic Statistics codes), support for business policies, differences between membership organizations and other organizational types, like corporations and governments. Furthermore, I also explore how the broad contours of these interest group communities shift and change over time, allowing me to see whether any type of organized interest is able to dominate their state interest group system.
KeywordsInterest groups Lobbying State politics Organized interests
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
- Berry, J.M. 1999. The new liberalism: The rising power of citizens groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Brunk, G.G., K.G. Hunter, and L.A. Wilson. 1991. Economic innovation and interest groups: The case of patents granted to residents of the American states. Social Science Quarterly 72(September): 601–607.Google Scholar
- Holyoke, T.T. 2015. Challenges of integrating levels of analysis in interest group research. In The organizational ecology of interest communities, ed. D. Lowery, D. Halpin, and V. Gray, 79–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Lowery, D., and V. Gray. 2007. Interest organization communities: Their assembly and consequences. In Interest group politics, 7th ed, ed. B.A. Loomis and A.J. Cigler, 130–154. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, C. 2008. Brussels versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- McGovern, G., and M. D. Greenberg. 2014. Shining a light on state campaign finance: An evaluation of the impact of the National Institute on Money in State Politics. Report by the Institute for Civil Justice at the RAND Corporation. See http://www.followthemoney.org/assets/press/RAND-report-Aug-2014/RAND-NIMSP-Report.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019.
- Morehouse, S.M. 1981. State politics, parties, and policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, A. 1993. The third house: Lobbyists and lobbying in the states. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
- Thomas, C.S., and R.J. Hrebenar. 1992. Changing patterns of interest group activity: A regional perspective. In The politics of interests: Interest groups transformed, ed. M.P. Petracca, 150–174. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Thomas, C.S., and R.J. Hrebenar. 2004. Interest groups in the states. In Politics of the American states, 8th ed, ed. V. Gray and R.L. Hanson, 100–128. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
- Zeigler, L.H., and H. van Dalen. 1976. Interest groups in the states. In Politics of the American states, 3rd ed, ed. H. Jacob and K.N. Vines. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- Zeller, B. 1954. American state legislatures, 2nd ed. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell.Google Scholar