Interest Groups & Advocacy

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 112–120 | Cite as

Considering the expanding role of interest groups in American presidential elections

  • Michael M. FranzEmail author
Review Essay

In early 2010, the US Supreme Court in Citizens United v. FEC opened the door to dramatic changes in American elections. The Court removed long-standing barriers on corporations, unions and ideological groups in the funding of direct messages to voters. The impact of Citizens United has been oft noted (and lamented) in the last half-decade, and this essay will focus on important changes in political advertising since 2010.

Interest groups do many things in elections, from recruiting and training individuals to run for office to helping candidates and parties with campaign funds and messaging (Rozell et al, 2011). And while interest groups have always participated in American elections (Mutch, 2014), the change in the character and content of their presence pre- and post-2010 is readily apparent. Many have lamented this, whether about levels of corruption in government (Teachout, 2014), the tendency toward plutocracy (Hasen, 2016), or the damage to free and lively citizen dialogue...


  1. Ansolabehere, S., de Figueiredo, J.M. and Snyder, J.M. (2003) Why is there so little money in politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(1): 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apollonio, D. and La Raja, R. (1999) Do PACs pick candidates? Who gets money from organized interests? Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, April 15–17, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B.L. (1998) Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boatright, R. (2007) Situating the new 527 groups in interest group theory. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics 5(2): Article 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boatright, R. (Ed.) (2015) The Deregulatory Moment? A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, M., Karol, D., Noel, H. and Zaller, J. (2008) The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dowling, C.M. and Wichowsky, A. (2015) Attacks without consequence? Candidates, parties, groups, and the changing face of negative advertising. American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowler, E.F., Franz, M. and Ridout, T. (2016) Political Advertising in the United States. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Franz, M. (2008) Choices and Changes: Interest Groups in the Electoral Process. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Franz, M. (2013) Interest groups in electoral politics: 2012 in context. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics 10(4): 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franz, M., Ridout, T. and Fowler, E. (2015a) Interest group issue strategies: Advertising in the 2014 congressional elections. At the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  12. Franz, M. M., Fowler, E. F. and Ridout, T. N. (2015b) Loose cannons or loyal foot soldiers? Toward a more complex theory of interest group advertising strategies. American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 738–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein, K., Schweidel, D.A. and Wittenwyler, M.B. (2012) Lessons learned: Political advertising and political law. Minnesota Law Review 96: 1732–1754.Google Scholar
  14. Hasen, R. (2016) Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kaplan, N., Park, D.K. and Ridout, T.N. (2006) Dialogue in American political campaigns? An examination of issue convergence in candidate television advertising. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 724–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. La Raja, R., and Schaffner, B. (2015) Campaign Finance and Political Polarization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lipsitz, K. (2013) Issue convergence is nothing more than issue convergence. Political Research Quarterly 66(4): 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mutch, R. (2014) Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nichols, J. and McChesney, R. (2013) Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
  20. Post, R. (2014) Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Primo, D. and Milyo, J. (2006) Campaign finance laws and political efficacy: Evidence from the states. Election Law Journal 5(1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rozell, M., Wilcox, C. and Franz, M. (2011) Interest Groups in American Campaigns: The New Face of Electioneering (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sigelman, L. and Buell, E.H., Jr. (2004) Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960–2000. American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 650–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Teachout, Z. (2014) Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin’s Snuff Box To Citizens United. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bowdoin CollegeBrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations