Interest Groups & Advocacy

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 1–21 | Cite as

Formal ties between interest groups and members of parliament: Gaining allies in legislative committees

Original Article

Abstract

While previous research on interest groups’ (IGs) relations to MPs has mainly focused on informal lobbying strategies or interorganizational linkages, the analysis of formal ties between MPs and IGs has remained neglected. Such formal ties can be conceptualized as an exchange relationship between individual MPs and IGs. The latter benefit from access to parliament while the former benefit from the expertise and support provided by IGs. We investigate whether committee members’ formal ties to IGs reflect committees’ responsibilities. Our results show that there is a strong topical match between committee members’ ties to IGs and committees’ area of competence. However, this congruence is less due to the background of MPs than to the ties developed after committee assignment. Formal ties are, to a large extent, the consequence of IGs recruiting MPs who can give them access to relevant committees. Empirical evidence comes from Swiss MPs’ ties to IGs between 2000 and 2015.

Keywords

interest group strategies recruitment legislative committees Switzerland 

References

  1. Allern, E.H., Aylott, N. and Christiansen, F.J. (2007) Social Democrats and trade unions in Scandinavia: The decline and persistence of institutional relationships. European Journal of Political Research 46(5): 607–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allern, E.H. and Bale, T. (2012) Political parties and interest groups: Disentangling complex relationships. Party Politics 18(1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baroni, L., Carroll, B.J., Chalmers, A.W., Marquez, L.M.M. and Rasmussen, A. (2014) Defining and classifying interest groups. Interest Groups and Advocacy 3(2): 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C. and Leech, B.L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B.L. (2001) Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics 63(4): 1191–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkhout, J. (2013) Why interest organizations do what they do: Assessing the explanatory potential of ‘exchange’ approaches. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2(2): 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beyers, J., Eising, R. and Maloney, W. (2008) Researching interest group politics in Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know? West European Politics 31(6): 1103–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binderkrantz, A.S., Christiansen, P.M. and Pedersen, H.H. (2015) Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. Governance 28(1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boehmke, F.J., Gailmard, S. and Patty, J.W. (2013) Business as usual: Interest group access and representation across policy-making venues. Journal of Public Policy 33(01): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouwen, P. (2004) The logic of access to the European parliament: Business lobbying in the committee on economic and monetary affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies 42(3): 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowler, S. and Farrell, D.M. (1995) The organizing of the European parliament: Committees, specialization and co-ordination. British Journal of Political Science 25(2): 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruderer, P. (2005) Lobbyisten im Ratssaal. In O. Baeriswyl (ed.), Lobbying in der Schweiz: Partikularinteressen unter der Bundeskuppel. Villars-sur-Glâne: Verlag Mediata.Google Scholar
  13. Christiansen, F.J. (2012) Organizational de-integration of political parties and interest groups in Denmark. Party Politics 18(1): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Bruycker, I. (2016) Power and position: Which EU party groups do lobbyists prioritize and why? Party Politics 22(4): 552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraussen, B., Beyers, J. and Donas, T. (2015) The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness: Institutionalised interest group access to advisory councils. Political Studies 63(3): 569–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraussen, B. and Halpin, D. (2016) Political parties and interest organizations at the crossroads: Perspectives on the transformation of political organizations. Political Studies Review 14 1–13.Google Scholar
  17. Gava, R., Varone, F., Mach, A., Eichenberger, S., Christe, J. and Chao-Blanco, C. (2016) Interests groups in parliament: Exploring MPs’ interest affiliations (2000–2011). Swiss Political Science Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  18. Giger, N. and Klüver, H. (2016) Voting against your constituents? How lobbying affects representation. American Journal of Political Science 60(1) 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilligan, T.W. and Krehbiel, K. (1987) Collective decisionmaking and standing committees: An informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 3(2): 287–335.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, R.L. and Deardorff, A.V. (2006) Lobbying as legislative subsidy. American Political Science Review 100(01): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen, M.E. (2010) Committee assignment politics in the Danish folketing. Scandinavian Political Studies 33(4): 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen, M.E. (2011) A random process? Committee assignments in Dáil Éireann. Irish Political Studies 26(3): 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heaney, M.T. (2010) Linking political parties and interest groups. In L.S. Maisel and J.M. Berry (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 568–587.Google Scholar
  24. Hojnacki, M., Marchetti, K.M., Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Kimball, D.C. and Leech, B.L. (2015) Assessing business advantage in Washington lobbying. Interest Groups & Advocacy 4(3): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holman, C. and Luneburg, W. (2012) Lobbying and transparency: A comparative analysis of regulatory reform. Interest Groups & Advocacy 1(1): 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirchheimer, O. (1966) The transformation of the Western European party systems. In J. LaPalombara and M. Weiner (eds.) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kriesi, H. (1980) Entscheidungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsprozesse in der Schweizer Politik. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Kriesi, H. and Trechsel, A.H. (2008) The Politics of Switzerland: Continuity and Change in a Consensus Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LaPira, T. and Thomas, H.F. (2014) Revolving door lobbyists and interest representation. Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(1): 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liebert, U. (1995) Parliamentary lobby regimes. In H. Döring (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Lüthi, R. (1996) Die Wirkung von institutionellen Reformen dargestellt am Beispiel der Reform des Kommissionensystems der Schweizerischen Bundesversammlung von 1991. Swiss Political Science Review 2(2): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lüthi, R. (1997) Die Legislativkommissionen der Schweizerischen Bundesversammlung: institutionelle Veränderungen und das Verhalten von Parlamentsmitgliedern. Bern: P. Haupt.Google Scholar
  33. Marshall, D. (2015) Explaining interest group interactions with party group members in the European parliament: Dominant party groups and coalition formation. Journal of Common Market Studies 53(2): 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mickler, T.A. (2013) Standing committee assignments in the German Bundestag – Who Gets what in within-party negotiations? German Politics 22(4): 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patzelt, W.J. (1997) German MPs and their roles. The Journal of Legislative Studies 3(1): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pedersen, H.H., Halpin, D. and Rasmussen, A. (2015) Who gives evidence to parliamentary committees? A comparative investigation of parliamentary committees and their constituencies. The Journal of Legislative Studies 21(3): 408–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pilotti, A. (2012) Les parlementaires suisses entre démocratisation et professionnalisation (1910–2010). Biographie collectives des élus fédéraux et réformes du Parlement helvétique. Lausanne: University of Lausanne.Google Scholar
  38. Poguntke, T. (2002) Party organizational linkage: Parties without firm social roots? In K.R. Luther and F. Müller-Rommel (eds.) Political Parties in the New Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rasmussen, A. and Gross, V. (2015) Biased access? Exploring selection to advisory committees. European Political Science Review 7(03): 343–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rasmussen, A. and Lindeboom, G.-J. (2013) Interest group-party linkage in the twenty-first century: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52(2): 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sciarini, P. (2014) Eppure si muove: The changing nature of the Swiss consensus democracy. Journal of European Public Policy 21(1): 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strøm, K. and Mattson, I. (1995) Parliamentary committees. In H. Döring (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, C.S. (ed.). (2001) Political Parties and Interest Groups: Shaping Democratic Governance. Boulder, CO: L. Rienner.Google Scholar
  44. Vatter, A. (2014) Das politische System der Schweiz. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  45. Weingast, B.R. and Marshall, W.J. (1988) The industrial organization of congress; or, why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets. Journal of Political Economy 96(1): 132–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yordanova, N. (2009) The rationale behind committee assignment in the European parliament distributive, informational and partisan perspectives. European Union Politics 10(2): 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Z’graggen, H. and Linder, W. (2004) Professionalisierung der Parlamente im internationalen Vergleich: Studie im Auftrag der Parlamentsdienste der Schweizerischen Bundesversammlung. Institut für Politikwissenschaft: Universität Bern.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of political, historical, and international studies (IEPHI)University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations