The Corporate Saving Glut and Falloff of Investment Spending in OECD Economies


We explore the increase in the net lending of non-financial corporations across the OECD following the global financial crisis. We document that this rise reflects both increases in saving and declines in investment. Panel regressions reveal that the fall in investment across OECD economies was generally in line with fundamentals—GDP growth, interest rates, and profits—though in some countries the weakness was more pronounced. We find little evidence that firms were reducing investment to strengthen their balance sheets, as payments to shareholders remained strong and were uncorrelated with investment. We conclude that, at least from the investment side, the rise in corporate net lending probably does not reflect a shift in corporate behavior relative to past norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11


  1. 1.

    Cash hoarding may be associated with corporate net lending, either because corporations have increased their saving relative to investment in order to bolster their cash holdings, or merely because corporations are parking their excess saving in liquid assets. But there is no direct relationship between corporate net lending and cash hoarding. For example, if corporations desired to strengthen their liquidity positions, they could issue long-term liabilities and acquire liquid assets, without any change in their net lending positions. By the same token, if corporations boosted their saving relative to investment but used these extra resources to repay debt, this would show up as a rise in net lending but no change in their cash holdings.

  2. 2.

    The difference between corporate profits and the corporate saving discussed earlier is that corporate saving is defined as profits minus net dividend payments.

  3. 3.

    Different definitions of cash flow are used in the literature; we use profits after payments of taxes, interest, and rents, because those payments are not controlled by the firm in the short run. For discussions of cash flow and investment, see, among others, Fazzari and others (1988), Hubbard (1998), and Cummins and others (2006).

  4. 4.

    Buybacks are negative when equity issuance exceeds share repurchases by firms.


  1. André, C. et al., 2007, “Corporate Net Lending: A Review of Recent Trends,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 583.

  2. Armenter, Roc and Viktoria Hnatkovska, 2012, “The Macroeconomics of Firms’ Saving,” Working Paper, August.

  3. Banerjee, Ryan, Jonathan Kearns, and Macro Lombardi, 2015, “(Why) is investment weak?” BIS Quarterly Review, March.

  4. Bates, Thomas W., Kathleen M. Kahle, and Rene M. Stulz, 2009, “Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash Than They Used To?,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 1985–2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernanke, Ben S., 2005, “The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit,” The Sandburg Lecture, Virginia Association of Economists, Richmond, VA, March 10.

  6. Bernanke, Ben S., 2007, “Global Imbalances: Recent Developments and Prospects,” The Bundesbank Lecture, Berlin, Germany, September 11.

  7. Cummins, Jason G., Kevin A. Hassett, and Stephen D. Oliner, 2006, “Investment Behavior, Observable Expectations, and Internal Funds,” American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 796–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Falato, Antonio, Dalida Kadyrhanova, and Jae W. Sim, 2012, “Rising Intangible Capital, Shrinking Debt Capacity, and the US Corporate Savings Glut,” Working Paper, June.

  9. Fazzari, Steven M., Glenn R. Hubbard, and Bruce C. Petersen, 1988, “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1, pp. 141–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hubbard, Glenn R., 1998, “Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Monetary Fund, 2006, “Chapter 4. Awash with Cash: Why are Corporate Savings so High,” in World Economic Outlook. Washington, April.

  12. International Monetary Fund, 2015, “Private Investment: What’s the hold up?,” World Economic Outlook April.

  13. Karabarbounis, Loukas and Neiman, Brent, 2012, “Declining Labor Shares and the Global Rise of Corporate Saving (2012),” NBER Working Paper No. 18154.

  14. Kothari, S.P., Jonathan Lewellen, and Jerold B. Warner, 2013, “The Behavior of Aggregate Corporate Investment” Working Paper.

  15. Lewis, Christine, Nigel Pain, Jan Strasky, and Fusako Menkyna, 2014, “Investment Gaps after the Crisis,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1168.

  16. Loeys, Jan et al., 2005, “Corporates are Driving the Global Saving Glut,” JP Morgan Research, June 24.

  17. Oliner, Stephen, Glenn Rudebusch, and Daniel Sichel, 1995, “New and Old Models of Business Investment: A Comparison of Forecasting Performance,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 806–826.

  18. Pinto, Eugenio and Stacey Tevlin, 2014, “Perspectives on the Recent Weakness in Investment,” FEDS Note, May 21, 2014.

  19. Sanchez, Juan M. and Emircan Yurdagul, 2013, “Why Are Corporations Holding So Much Cash?,” The Regional Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, January.

  20. Summers, Lawrence, 2014, “U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound,” Business Economics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 65–73.

  21. The Economist, 2005, “The Corporate Saving Glut,” July 7.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph W. Gruber.

Additional information

*The authors are Deputy Associate Director and Director of the International Finance Division, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551, U.S.A. They can be reached at and The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or of any other person associated with the Federal Reserve System. Michael DeDad and Tessa Morrison provided superb research assistance.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TXT 6 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (WF1 245 kb)

Appendix A: Data Description

Appendix A: Data Description

Country Sample: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States.

Data Sources and Descriptions

GDP: Real and nominal GDP are from the OECD Economic Outlook.

GDP and Investment Deflators: From the OECD Economic Outlook with the exception of the U.S. which are taken from the BEA National Accounts. The OECD investment deflators are for Gross Fixed Capital Formation. For the U.S., the investment deflator is for Private Fixed Investment.

Real Capital Stock: From the OECD Economic Outlook.

Investment, Profits, Net Dividends: All data are for the non-financial corporate sector with the exception of Switzerland where the data are for the total corporate sector. Data are from the OECD National Accounts, with the exception of the U.S. and Canada where data are from their respective national Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts.

  • Investment is defined as gross fixed capital formation.

  • As described in the text, profits are defined as the gross operating surplus less net interest payments, rent, and taxes.

  • Net dividends are the distributed payments of corporations plus reinvested earnings on foreign direct investment in the domestic economy less the distributed income of corporations and reinvested earnings of domestic corporations abroad.

Share Buybacks: The negative of the net incurrence of equity liabilities from the OECD National Accounts. Except for the U.S. and Canada, where the data are from national Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts.

Interest Rates: 10-year sovereign bond yields from the OECD Economic Outlook. Except for Estonia where the lending rate as reported in the World Bank World Development Indicators was used.

Depreciation Rate: Productive capital stock scrapping rate as reported in the OECD Economic Outlook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gruber, J.W., Kamin, S.B. The Corporate Saving Glut and Falloff of Investment Spending in OECD Economies. IMF Econ Rev 64, 777–799 (2016).

Download citation


  • E21
  • E22
  • G30