Skip to main content
Log in

Quality Assurance in Nordic Higher Education: Relevance and Quality for the Welfare State?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality assurance (QA) has become an important feature in higher education governance in Europe, with policies for increased harmonization and periodic accreditations as pillars. Still, the shift to emphasize quality development and enhancement entails that QA systems can attend to a wider range of considerations than before. This article studies the development in national QA systems and instruments in Denmark and Norway in the 2010s and incorporates welfare state literature to explain the use of QA instruments. The material for the study consists of documents, as well as decisions associated with QA instruments. Following a historical-institutionalist perspective, the article finds notable differences between the two countries, both in the organizations involved and instruments used. Denmark has emphasized the study programme level through periodic accreditations, while Norway has practiced one-off institutional accreditations and supervisions. The findings show an emphasis on relevance and employment in Denmark, and university status in Norway. The article considers the differences in light of features of higher education systems and politico-administrative regimes, but also highlights similarities in layering of instruments and the use of QA for social democratic welfare state goals. In this way, the findings illustrate that QA systems could serve distinct purposes despite harmonization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Act on the Danish Accreditation Institution. (2007) Act no. 294 of 27 March 2007 on the Danish Accreditation Institution for higher education.

  • Ahola, S., Hedmo, T., Thomsen, J.-P. and Vabø, A. (2014) Organisational features of higher education. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Oslo: NIFU. NIFU Working Paper 2014:14.

  • Ansell, B.W. (2010) From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bégin-Caouette, O., Askvik, T. and Cui, B. (2016) Interplays between welfare regimes typology and academic research systems in OECD countries. Higher Education Policy 29(3): 287–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, C. and Jacobsen, J.C. (2017) Nullifying quality: the marketisation of higher education. Quality in Higher Education 23(1): 20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. and Checkel, J.T. (2015) Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmur, D. (2007) ‘The Public Regulation of Higher Education Qualities: Rationale, Processes, and Outcomes’, in D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M. J. Rosa (eds.) Quality Assurance In Higher Education : Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 15–45.

  • Bleiklie, I. (2009) ‘Norway: From Tortoise to Eager Beaver?’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds.) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 127–152.

  • Bleiklie, I. and Michelsen, S. (2019) Scandinavian higher education governance—pursuing similar goals through different organizational arrangements. European Policy Analysis 5(2): 190–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson, M., Ahola, S., Helland, H., Thomsen, J.-P, and Frølich, N. (2014) Enrolment patterns in Nordic higher education, ca 1945 to 2010. Institutions, types of education and fields of study, Oslo: NIFU. NIFU Working Paper 2014:15.

  • Capano, G. and Pritoni, A. (2019) Varieties of hybrid systemic governance in European Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly 73(1): 10–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. and Pritoni, A. (2020) What really happens in higher education governance? Trajectories of adopted policy instruments in higher education over time in 16 European countries. Higher Education 80(5): 989–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. and Gornitzka, Å. (2017) Reputation management in complex environments—a comparative study of university organizations. Higher Education Policy 30(1): 123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Gornitzka, Å. and Maassen, P. (2014) 'Global pressures and national cultures. A Nordic University template?', in P. Mattei (ed.) University Adaptation in Difficult Economic Times New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 30–51.

  • Chu, A. and Westerheijden, D.F. (2018) Between quality and control: what can we learn from higher education quality assurance policy in the Netherlands. Quality in Higher Education 24(3): 260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D. (2011) ‘Understanding process tracing’, PS: Political Science & Politics 44(4): 823–830.

  • DA. (2010) Akkrediteringsrådet og ACE Denmark: Akkrediteringsinstitutionens selvevalueringsrapport, Copenhagen: The Danish Accreditation Institution.

  • DA. (2014a) Resultatkontrakt 2014, Copenhagen: The Danish Accreditation Institution.

  • DA. (2014b) Universitetsuddannelser udfordret på relevansen, Copenhagen: The Danish Accreditation Institution.

  • DA. (2016) ENQA Review—Self-Assessment Report—January 2016, Copenhagen: The Danish Accreditation Institution.

  • DA. (2019) Vejledning om institutionsakkreditering 2.0, Copenhagen: The Danish Accreditation Institution.

  • Danish Government (2002) Tid til forandring for Danmarks universiteter, Copenhagen: The Danish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Research (2016) Vejledning til prækvalifikation af nye uddannelser og nye uddannelsesudbud af videregående uddannelser, Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Research (2018) Evaluering af den ledighedsbaserede dimensioneringsmodel, Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Research (2020) Prækvalifikation, akkreditering og sammenlægning af uddannelser. Ministry webpages, http://ufm.dk/uddannelse-og-institutioner/videregaende-uddannelse/kvalitetssikring-og-akkreditering, accessed 10 March 2020.

  • Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. (2010) Universitetsevalueringen 2009 – Evalueringsrapport, Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.

  • Danish Productivity Commission. (2013) Uddannelse og innovation. Produktivitetskommissionens analyserapport 4, Copenhagen: The Danish Productivity Commission.

  • Elken, M. and Frølich, N. (2017) 'Pulling the plug in a bathtub: the big consequences of a small change in Norwegian higher education', in H. de Boer, J. File, J. Huisman, M. Seeber, M. Vukasovic and D.F. Westerheijden (eds.) Policy Analysis of Structural Reforms in Higher Education Cham: Springer, pp. 95–117.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. and Westerheijden, D.F. (2014) Quality assurance in the European policy arena. Policy and Society 33(3): 167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESG (2015) Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG), Brussels: EURASHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. and Stensaker, B. (2014) The dynamics of European regulatory regimes in higher education—challenged prerogatives and evolutionary change. Policy and Society 33(3): 177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H.F. (2011) 'NPM in Scandinavia', in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.) The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H.F. (2014) '“Quality agencies”: the development of regulating and mediating organizations in Scandinavian higher education', in M.-H. Chou and Å. Gornitzka (eds.) Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 188–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H.F., Aarrevaara, T., Geschwind, L. and Stensaker, B. (2019) 'Evaluation practices and impact: overload?', in R. Pinheiro, L. Geschwind, H.F. Hansen and K. Pulkkinen (eds.) Reforms, Organizational Change and Performance in Higher Education: A Comparative Account from the Nordic Countries Cham: Springer, pp. 235–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. and Green, D. (1993) Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18(1): 9–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. and Newton, J. (2007) ‘Transforming quality evaluation: moving On’, in D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M.J. Rosa (eds.). Quality Assurance in Higher Education : Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 225-245.

  • Hood, C. (1983) The Tools of Government, London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, C. (2007) Governing the governance of education: the state strikes back? European Educational Research Journal 6(3): 266–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, C. (2011) Evaluation–the (not so) softlysoftly approach to governance and its consequences for compulsory education in the Nordic countries. Education Inquiry 2(4): 671–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, D.S. (2014) Regulating higher education: Quality assurance and neo-liberal managerialism in higher education—a critical introduction. Policy and Society 33(3): 155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerdal, E. (2002) ‘Distriktshøgskolen–et reformpolitisk mellomspill?’, in S. Michelsen and T. Halvorsen (eds.). Faglige forbindelser: Profesjonsutdanning og kunnskapspolitikk etter høgskolereformen, Bergen, Fagbokforlaget, pp. 53-86.

  • Jungblut, J. and Woelert, P. (2018) 'The changing fortunes of intermediary agencies: reconfiguring higher education policy in Norway and Australia', in P. Maassen, M. Nerland and L. Yates (eds.) Reconfiguring Knowledge in Higher Education Cham: Springer, pp. 25–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2017) Quality assurance policies and practices in Scandinavian higher education systems: convergence or different paths? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 39(3): 247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., Westerheijden, D. and Stensaker, B. (2008) Evaluation of NOKUT—The Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research. Report 1: NOKUT and the European standards and guidelines for external quality assurance agencies.

  • Lepori, B. and Kyvik, S. (2010) The research mission of universities of applied sciences and the future configuration of higher education systems in Europe. Higher Education Policy 23(3): 295–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (2012) Patterns of Democracy, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyby, L., Huisman, J., Blaker, S., Danielsen, Å. and Waaler, J. (2020) Styring av universiteter og høyskoler i Norge, Oslo: NIFU. NIFU-rapport 2020:25.

  • Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010) 'A theory of gradual institutional change', in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds.) Explaining Institutional Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2011) Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NOKUT (2011) Årsrapport 2010, Oslo: NOKUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOKUT (2014) Strategi for utvikling av NOKUT, 2015–2020, Oslo: NOKUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOKUT. (2017) Om forskriften og gjennomføring av tilsynet, Agency webpages, https://www.nokut.no/utdanningskvalitet/tilsyn-med-det-systematiske-kvalitetsarbeidet/om-forskriften/, accessed 10 March 2020.

  • NOKUT. (2020a) Akkreditering og tilsyn - høyere utdanning. Agency webpages, https://www.nokut.no/publikasjoner/akkreditering-og-tilsyn--hoyere-utdanning/, accessed 10 March 2020.

  • NOKUT. (2020b) Akkreditering som universitet. Veiledning for institusjoner som søker institusjonsakkreditering, Oslo: NOKUT.

  • Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2018) Tildelingsbrev for NOKUT, 2018, Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyborg, P. (2007) Universitets- og høgskolesamarbeid i en brytningstid : femti års utvikling, Oslo: Unipub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M. and Peters, B.G. (2010) Tradition and Public Administration, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I. and Ferlie, E. (2009) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pechar, H. and Andres, L. (2011) Higher-education policies and welfare regimes: international comparative perspectives. Higher Education Policy 24(1): 25–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., Hansen, H.F. and Pulkkinen, K. (2019) Reforms, Organizational Change and Performance in Higher Education: A Comparative Account from the Nordic Countries, Cham: Springer.

  • Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2011) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (3rd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Regulation on academic supervision (2017) Norwegian Regulation Concerning Supervision of the Educational Quality in Higher Education, Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation on accreditation (2003) Norwegian Regulation on Criteria for Accreditation of Institutions and Standards and Criteria for Accreditation of Study Programmes in Norwegian Higher Education, Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, E. and Meyer, J.W. (2005) The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review 70(6): 898–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Velarde, K. (2014) Rising above institutional constraints? The quest of German accreditation agencies for autonomy and professional legitimacy. Minerva 52(1): 97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J.C. and Teichler, U. (2014) The Future of the Post-Massified University at the Crossroads, Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, J.-C. and Stensaker, B. (1999) National quality assessment systems in the Nordic countries: developing a balance between external and internal needs? Higher Education Policy 12(1): 3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St.meld. nr. 27 (2000–2001) (2001) Gjør din plikt - Krev din rett, Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Education, Research, and Church Affairs.

  • Stensaker, B. (2006) Governmental policy, organisational ideals and institutional adaptation in Norwegian higher education. Studies in Higher Education 31(1): 43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. and Harvey, L. (2010) Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E.M., Hansen, H.F. and Kristiansen, M.B. (2017) Public Management in Times of Austerity, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2014) 'Possible futures for higher education: challenges for higher education research', in J.C. Shin and U. Teichler (eds.) The Future of the Post-Massified University at the Crossroads: Restructuring Systems and Functions, Cham: Springer, pp. 145–166.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, J.-P. (2014) ‘Denmark’, in S. Ahola, T. Hedmo, J.-P. Thomsen and A. Vabø (eds.). Organisational Features of Higher Education; Denmark, Finland, Norway & Sweden, Oslo: NOKUT, pp. 15-32. NIFU Working Paper 2014:14.

  • Universities and University Colleges Act (2005) Norwegian Act of 1 April 2005 no. 15 relating to Universities and University Colleges.

  • Vabø, A. and Hovdhaugen, E. (2014) ‘Norway’, in S. Ahola, T. Hedmo, J.-P. Thomsen and A. Vabø (eds.). Organisational features of higher education; Denmark, Finland, Norway & Sweden, Oslo: NIFU, pp. 59-72. NIFU Working Paper 2014:14.

  • Westerheijden, D.F. and Kohoutek, J. (2014) 'Implementation and translation', in H. Eggins (ed.) Drivers and Barriers to Achieving Quality in Higher Education, Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F., Stensaker, B. and Rosa, M.J. (2007a) 'Introduction', in D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M.J. Rosa (eds.) Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation, vol. 20, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F., Stensaker, B. and Rosa, M.J. (2007b) Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation, vol. 20, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2016) Quality assurance and quality enhancement: is there a relationship? Quality in Higher Education 22(2): 97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. and Ørberg, J.W. (2011) ‘The double shuffle of University Reform: The OECD/Denmark Policy Interface’, in T. Halvorsen and A. Nyhagen (eds.). Academic Identities - Academic Challenges? American and European Experience of the Transformation of Higher Education and Research, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 269–293.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanne Kvilhaugsvik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kvilhaugsvik, H. Quality Assurance in Nordic Higher Education: Relevance and Quality for the Welfare State?. High Educ Policy 35, 909–928 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00239-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00239-9

Keywords

Navigation