Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

China’s Higher Education Policy Change from 211 Project and 985 Project to the Double-first-class Plan: Applying Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used multiple streams framework to analyse the motivation of reform from 211 Project and 985 Project to the Double-first-class Plan in China. Results indicate that all the three streams (problem stream, policy stream, and political stream), opening of policy window and policy entrepreneurs’ effort played important roles in promoting the policy reform. However, different from Kingdon's opinion, in China's political system, the independence of the three streams is weakened, and the dual identity of entrepreneurs also makes the boundaries between the three streams blurred. Political stream plays a leading role, while China's special political system is also conducive to the convergence of the three streams. In addition, discussions on Internet also play an important role in educational policy reform. When the public is aware of the reform possibilities, the national sentiment formed by heated discussion on Internet can affect the decision and direction of the reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackrill, R., Kay, A. and Zahariadis, N. (2013) Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy 20(6): 871–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARWU. (2015). Academic Ranking of World Universities 2015. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2015.html.

  • Béland, D. and Howlett, M. (2016) The role and impact of the multiple- streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Contemporary Policy Analysis 18(3): 221–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. and Jones, M.D. (2016) Kingdon’s multiple streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of this Universal Theory. Policy Studies Journal 44(1): 37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B. and Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2009) Four stories: Confronting contemporary ideas about globalisation and internationalisation in Higher Education. Globalisation, Societies and Education 7(3): 289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, W. (2014). Ministry of Education responded to rumors: there is no case of abolishing Project ‘211’ and Project ‘985’. China Educational Daily. http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s5147/201411/178213.html.

  • Chen, B., Deng, Z. and Yang, J. (2018) Study on the change of China’s foreign cultural trade policy since the reform and opening up 40 years ago. China Soft Science 10: 39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R., & Elder, C. (1972). Participation in American politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-building. Allyn & Bacon.

  • Cohen, M., March, J. and Olsen, J. (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Quarterly 17(1): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y. (2014). ‘211’ and ‘985’ controversy: 20 times the disparity of scientific research funds. Economic Observer. http://m.eeo.com.cn/2014/1210/269957.shtml.

  • Easton, D. (1965) A systems analysis of political life, John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H. (2019) Policy Agenda Analysis Based on Multi-stream Model: A Case Study of Shared Bicycle. E-Government 193(1): 86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2013). World-Class Universities or World-Class Systems? Rankings and Higher Education Policy Choices. Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses, UNESCO, Paris, 2-23.

  • Huang, D. (2017) My understanding of “Double-first-class” policy. China Higher Education 19: 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. and Xu, Z. (2012) Policy Agenda Analysis of “The School Bus Safety Regulations (Draft)”: Based on the Multiple streams Model Perspective. Journal of Public Management 9(3): 19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F. and Sui, Y. (2016) The construction of world-class universities should be based on the construction of first-class disciplines. Research in Educational Development 36(19): 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, T., & Yang, P. (2016). "985" and "211" have achieved success and retreat. https://news.seu.edu.cn/7e/1d/c5485a163357/page.psp.

  • Kang, N., Zhang, Q. and Su, H. (2016) The historical logic of the transformation of “Project ‘985’” and the implementation of “Scheme Double first class.” Tsinghua Journal of Education 37(5): 76–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, N., Zhang, Q. and Su, H. (2018) Understanding the policy-making of China’s higher education through the lens of national policy documents. Fudan Education Forum 16(5): 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J.W. (2004) Agenda, Renmin University Press: Options and Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y., & Guo, X. (2012). College graduates say no to "211 discrimination". https://www.clssn.com/html1/report/7/1955-1.htm.

  • Li, W. (2018) Multiple streams Framework: Exploring the Impact of Ambiguity on the Policy Process. Administrative Tribune. 25(02): 88–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2006). A preliminary consideration of the prospects of cyber democracy: A consideration with public space as the core, a dialogue between politics and information. Yang-Chih Book Co.

  • Liu, J. and Fang, X. (2016) What Are the Dispute of the Existence and Abolition of “211” and “985.” Modern Education Management 6: 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, H. (2013). 90% of college students who graduated from 211 or 985 are discriminated against in employment. https://www.chsi.com.cn/lh/jy/201303/20130315/399234517.html.

  • Mara, H. (2008) The Man behind the World’s Most-Watched College Rankings. Chronicle of Higher Education 55(8): 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson S., Kaur S., Sawir E. (2011). Global, Local, National in the Asia-Pacific. In: Marginson S., Kaur S., Sawir E. (eds) Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Ministry of Education of China. (2004a). Bulletin of the Ministry of Education, No. 18. Constructing Innovative Platform, Constructing Advantage Disciplines, Accelerating the Construction of World-class Universities and High-level Research Universities: Zhou Ji's Speech at the Second Construction Conference of "‘985’ Project". http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/gk_gbgg/moe_0/moe_1/moe_155/tnull_4074.html.

  • Ministry of Education of China.. (2004b). Zhou Ji's speech at the second phase construction work conference of "985 Project". http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/gk_gbgg/moe_0/moe_1/moe_155/tnull_4074.html.

  • Ministry of Education of China. (2013). Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Education on Strengthening the Employment Information Service for College Graduates. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A15/s3265/201304/t20130417_150998.html.

  • Pan, B. (2014). Netizens are talking about "‘211’" and "‘985’" being abolished. Guangzhou Daily, http://news.cqnews.net/html/2014-11/26/content_32732480.htm.

  • She, Z. (2014). More than 40% of respondents: ‘985’ and ‘211’ should not continue. Beijing News. http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2014/11/307769.shtm.

  • Shen, J. and Zhang, J. (2019) Is the Internet the engine of democracy? The Dilemma of Technological Optimism and the Prospect of Network Democracy. Theoretical Investigation 206(1): 140–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, Y. (2017) Rational thinking on “double first-class construction.” Journal of Higher Education 38(9): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. and Tang, M. (2019) Theoretical Verification and Applicable Fields: Theoretical Analysis of Multi-Source Flow Framework—Based on Test Analysis of 14Cases. Journal of Public Administration 5: 28–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2017) Four transformations: Scan on the inner logic of Double World-Class building. Journal of Henan Normal University 44(3): 144–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. and Li, Y. (2018) Policy Changes and Their Multiple streams Analysis in the Background of Media Convergence: A Case Study of the Changes from Only-child to Unconditioned Two-child Policy. Journal of Nanjing University 5: 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2015). Leading comrades such as the CPPCC Central Committee and the CPPCC National Committee participated in the joint discussion of the three sessions of the 12th CPPCC National Committee. People's Political Consultative Conference Bulletin. http://www.rmzxb.com.cn/zt/2015qglh/lhyw/460811.shtml?t=1425783666577.

  • Wang, Q., Zhang, T. and Zhang, L. (2017) From “211 Project” to “Double first class”: The internal mechanism of policy change in China’s construction of world first class universities. Social Scientist 247(11): 121–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. and Xue, E. (2018) Research on policy process of “Private Education Promotion Law” revision: Based on perspective of dynamic nested theory of multiple streams. Research in Educational Development 13: 38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Ma, L. and Yang, Y. (2007) The Local Governments’ Impetus for Innovations, their Characteristics and the Related Performance: An Analysis of the Test of Cases Adopted from “The Awards for Innovation to China’s Local Governments.” Management World 8: 43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. (2014) Study on Policy Agenda of “The 2nd-child Policy for Only-child Parents”: Views based on Multiple streams Theory. Theory and Modernization 4: 30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2018) National ability in university development: Practical appeal, evolution Path and theoretical review. Jiangsu Higher Education 208(6): 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, F. (2016) Institutional analysis of double world-class for university and academic discipline in China. Research on Higher Education in China 11: 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J. (2018) Research on the change of China’s housing purchase restriction policy. Theoretical Exploration 234(6): 96–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. (2018) How can the Decision-making Model of Policy Process Explain Better the Chinese Experience under Ambiguity Conditions? Journal of Public Management 15(4): 39–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y. (2019) Research on the dynamic model of China’s poverty alleviation policy change from the perspective of multiple streams theory. Academic Exchange 298(1): 126–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J., & Li, M. (2014, January 20). "‘211’" and "‘985’" controversy: 20 times the disparity of scientific research funds. Economic Observer. http://history.people.com.cn/peoplevision/n/2014/1120/c390799-26062635-4.html.

  • Zhang, J. (2014) On the policy agenda for attending college entrance examinations in other places in China: Based on the perspective of multiple streams framework. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration 3: 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2014). The controversy over the preservation and abolition of ‘985’ and ‘211’ has aroused heated debate over whether to reshuffle the University structure. Sina network. http://gx.sina.com.cn/zt/jinrihuati017/index.shtml.

  • Zhang, Y. (2014). The abolition of the 985 Project 211 project originated from the speech by the President of Central South University. http://hunan.sina.com.cn/news/b/2014-11-13/detail-cesifvw7298667.shtml.

  • Zheng, T., & Yuan, R. (2014). The difference in funding for scientific research is over 20 times, how much is the "golden hat" of "211 985"? Xinhua net, http://ex.cssn.cn/zx/yw/201411/t20141118_1404638.shtml.

  • Zhu, Z. and Chen, Q. (2015) The layered multiple-streams theory centered on political stream and its application: A case study of the shanghai free trade area. Comparative Economic & Social Systems 182(6): 68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. and Cheng, J.Y.S. (2011) The emergence of cyber society and the transformation of the public policy agenda-building process in China. China Review 11(2): 153–182

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research of the Ministry of Education (Grand No. 18JZD056).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou310058, China

    Liting Lin & Shutao Wang

Authors
  1. Liting Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shutao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shutao Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, L., Wang, S. China’s Higher Education Policy Change from 211 Project and 985 Project to the Double-first-class Plan: Applying Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework. High Educ Policy 35, 808–832 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00234-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00234-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation