Skip to main content
Log in

Institutional Autonomy and Capacity of Higher Education Governance in South Asia: A Comparative Perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Recent studies reveal that developing countries cannot achieve good governance in higher education by merely borrowing structures from advanced systems because the globally advocated “one-best-way” approach often ignores levels of institutional capacity in developing countries. This study suggests institutional capacity as a core dimension for practicing good governance in four South Asian countries (Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka). Building on this, this study compiles data from each country’s legislation and the UNESCO data to evaluate the autonomy and capacity of higher education institutions and compares those with Southeast and Northeast Asian countries as a reference. This study finds that these four South Asian countries are grouped into different environments based on the divergent paths to governance improvement suggested for each group. This study concludes that university autonomy is critical for good governance in the long run, whereas it is the capacity building that should be given priority to provide an optimal governance environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, P. (2007) ‘Private deemed universities in India’, International Higher Education 49(2007): 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, G. M. (2009) ‘The role of science and technology education at network age population for sustainable development of Bangladesh through human resource advancement’, Scientific Research and Essays 4(11): 1260–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (2014) ‘India’s higher education challenges’, Asia Pacific Education Review 15(4): 503–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Analoui, F. and Danquah, J. K. (2017) ‘Uses of capacity development in the development practice’, in F. Analoui and J.K. Danquah (eds.) Critical Capacity Development, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 61–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anandakrishnan, A. (2010) ‘Accountability and transparency in university governance’, University News 48(45): 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. (2008) ‘The good governance agenda: beyond indicators without theory’, Oxford Development Studies 36(4): 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (2014) Innovative strategies in higher education for accelerated human resource development in south Asia, Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (2015a) Innovative strategies in higher education for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Nepal, Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (2015b) Innovative strategies in higher education for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Bangladesh, Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (2016) Innovative strategies in higher education for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Sri Lanka, Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baral, K. J. (2007) ‘Higher education financing in Nepal’, Journal of Nepalese Business Studies 4(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D. and Goedegebuure, L. (2020) Good governance and higher education, in P. Teixeira and J. Shin (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 572–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1991) ‘Autonomy and accountability in US higher education’, in G. Neave and F. van Vught (eds.) Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe, Oxford: Pergamous Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersch, K., Praça, S. and Taylor, M. M. (2017) ‘State capacity, bureaucratic politicization, and corruption in the Brazilian state’, Governance 30(1): 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., Enders, J. and Schimank, U. (2007) ‘On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany’, in D. Jansen (eds.) New forms of governance in research organizations, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 137–152.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. and Dossani, R. (2013) ‘Goals and governance of higher education in India’, Higher Education 65(5): 595–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., Loyalka, P., Dobryakova, M., Dossani, R., Froumin, L. and Kuhns, K. (2013) University expansion in a changing global economy: triumph of the BRICS?, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, H. and Alam, F. (2012) ‘Engineering education in Bangladesh—an indicator of economic development’, European Journal of Engineering Education 37(2): 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Lægreid, P. and Rykkja, L. H. (2016) ‘Organizing for crisis management: building governance capacity and legitimacy, Public Administration Review, 76(6): 887–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, G., De Mel, N., Devasiri, R., Dissanayake, L., Kailasapathy, P., Karunathilake, I., Perera, M., Uyangoda, J. and Weerakoon, D. (2015) University governance, autonomy, and accountability: directions for change, Workshop Report prepared for University of Colombo Workshop, 3–4 September 2015, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

  • Datta, S. and Saad, M. (2011) ‘University and innovation systems: the case of India’, Science and Public Policy 38(1): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, A. (2009) Without capacity, there is no development, Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP). http://www.iiep.unesco.org/en/publication/without-capacity-there-no-development.

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2009) ‘Democratization as deliberative capacity building’, Comparative political studies 42(11): 1379–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. S. (2020) ‘Autonomy and accountability in higher education, North America’, in P. Teixeira, and J. Shin (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp.149–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, D. (2004) ‘Autonomy in education and development’, Journal of International Co-Operation in Education 7(1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estermann, T. and Pruvot, E. B. (2020) ‘Institutional autonomy in higher education’, in P. Teixeira and J. Shin (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1732–1740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estermann, T., Nokkala, T. and Steinel, M. (2011) University autonomy in Europe II: The Scorecard. Brussels: European University Association, https://www.snesup.pt/htmls/_dlds/University_Autonomy_in_Europe_-_II_-_The_Scorecard1-sflb.pdf, accessed 21 August 2019.

  • European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) (2003) ‘Building capacity: how can it be done?’, InfoCotonou 2(2003): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C. and Andresani, G. (2008) ‘The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective’, Higher Education 56(3): 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiszbein, A. and Ringold, D. (2012) Benchmarking the governance of tertiary education systems (English), Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/423481468272040065/pdf/944460WP00PUBL0in0Tertiary0Ed0Final.pdf, accessed 28 October 2019.

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013) ‘What is governance?’, Governance 26(3): 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2016) ‘Governance: What do we know, and how do we know it?’, Annual Review of Political Science 19: 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire, S. (2014) An Assessment of the Campus Autonomy: A Case of Mahendra Ratna Multiple Campus. Ilam Mini-research Report, http://www.martinchautari.org.np/files/HigherEducationDocument/AnAssessmentOfTheCampusAutonomy-ACaseOfMahendraRatnaMultipleCampusIlam2014SiraramGhimire.pdf, accessed 3 October 2019.

  • Grindle, M. S. (2004) ‘Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries’, Governance 17(4): 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. and Xu, X. (2019) ‘How far has the state ‘stepped back’: an exploratory study of the changing governance of higher education in China (1978–2018)’, Higher Education 78: 931–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope Sr., K. R. (2009) ‘Capacity development for good governance in developing countries: some lessons from the field’, InternationalJournal of Public Administration 32(8): 728–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (2020) ‘Accountability in higher education’ in P. Teixeira and J. Shin (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Universities (2019) World Higher Education Database, https://whed.net/home.php, accessed 12 June 2019.

  • Islam, G. M. N., Ali, M. I. and Islam, M. Z. (2017) ‘Quality assurance and accreditation mechanisms of higher education institutions: policy issues and challenges in Bangladesh’, European Journal of Education Studies 3(5): 278–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, Y. (2015) ‘Expansion and quality in Bangladesh’, International Higher Education no. 44 online publication, Mar 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2006.44.7910.

  • Larsen, I., Maassen, P. and Stensaker, B. (2009) ‘Four basic dilemmas in university governance reform’, Higher Education Management and Policy 21(3): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich, A. (1993) ‘Governance, democracy and development in the third world’, Third World Quarterly 14(3): 605–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lino, S. S. (2018) ‘Relating autonomy and capacity to higher education governance in Malawi: a case study on the University of Malawi, College of Medicine Reforms’, Master Thesis, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo.

  • Marginson, S. (2011) ‘Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: rise of the Confucian model’, Higher Education 61(5): 587–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (Ed.) (2010) The search for new governance of higher education in Asia, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2012) The evaluative state, institutional autonomy and re-engineering higher education in Western Europe: the prince and his pleasure, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ra, S., and Joshi, R. D. (2020) ‘Higher education systems and institutions, Nepal’, in P. Teixeira and J. Shin (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1330–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_579-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani, G. and Chowdhury, S. (2014) ‘Quality of higher education in Bangladesh: governance framework and quality issues’, Beykent University Journal of Social Sciences 7(1): 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, T., Nakata, S., Nagashima, Y., Rahman, M., Sharma, U. and Rahman, M. A. (2019) Bangladesh tertiary education sector review: skills and innovation for growth (English), Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/303961553747212653/bangladesh-tertiary-education-sector-review-skills-and-innovation-for-growth, accessed on 22 September 2020.

  • Randiwela, P. and Herath, S. K. (2008) ‘Improving relevance and quality of undergraduate education in Sri Lanka: the need for a change in public funding strategy’, International Journal of Innovation and Learning 5(3): 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza, R. (2009) Examining autonomy and accountability in public and private tertiary institutions, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/267671468158063464/pdf/526540WP0Auton145574B01PUBLIC110pdf.pdf, accessed 22 July 2019, accessed on 21 April 2020.

  • Reed, M. I. (2002) ‘New managerialism, professional power, and organizational governance in UK universities: a review and assessment’, in A. Amaral, G. Jones and B. Karseth (eds.) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 163–185.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. I., Meek, V. L. and Jones G. A. (2002) ‘Introduction’, in A. Amaral, G. Jones and B. Karseth (eds.) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. xv–xxxi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, K. D. (2017) ‘World Bank in Nepal’s education: three decades of neoliberal reform’, Globalisation, Societies and Education 15(2): 188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, K. D. (2019) ‘Educational governance in Nepal: weak government, donor partnership and standardised assessment’. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1587704

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) ‘The new governance: governing without government’, Political studies 44(4): 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E.-O. (1992) Governance without government: order and change in world politics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saint, W. (2009) ‘Legal frameworks for higher education governance in sub-saharan africa’, Higher Education Policy 22(4): 523–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. H., Rana, S. R. S. and Zitu, R. A. Z. R. A. (2012) ‘Challenges of quality higher education in Bangladesh: a study on public universities’, Market Forces 8(4): 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. (1998) ‘Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand's reforms’, The World Bank Research Observer 13(1): 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (Ed.) (2014) International Trends in University Governance: autonomy, self-government and the distribution of authority, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, X. and Wu, Z. (2018) ‘Paradigm shift of higher education governance in China’, in Shin J. C. (eds.) Higher Education Governance in East Asia, Singapore: Springer, pp. 55–72.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C. (Ed.) (2018) Higher education governance in east Asia: transformations under neoliberalism, Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., Li, X., Byun, B. and Nam, I. (2020) Building a coordination system of HRD, research and industry for knowledge and technology-driven economic development in South Asia. International Journal of Educational Development, Open access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simkhada, P. and Van Teijlingen, E. (2010) ‘Higher education in Nepal: several challenges ahead’, Diaspora 3(1): 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirat, M. B. (2010) ‘Strategic planning directions of Malaysia’s higher education: University autonomy in the midst of political uncertainties’, Higher education 59(4): 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, S. (2019) ‘New patterns of governance in higher education: predictors of the shift toward academic capitalism’, Korean Educational Development Institute Journal of Educational Policy 16(1): 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, J. K. and Chowdhury, A. (Eds.). (2012) Is good governance good for development?, London: A&C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. T. (2014) ‘Governance in higher education in Vietnam—a move towards decentralization and its practical problems’, Journal of Asian Public Policy 7(1): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trilokekar, R. D. (2020) ‘Higher education systems and institutions, India’, in J. C. Shin and P. Teixeira (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1128–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (2014) Governance for sustainable development: integrating governance in the post-2015 development framework, New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/democratic-governance/discussion-paper---governance-for-sustainable-development.html

  • United Nations Development Programme (2009) Capacity development: A UNDP primer, New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/capacity-building/capacity-development-a-undp-primer.html

  • Van Doeveren, V. (2011) ‘Rethinking good governance: identifying common principles’, Public Integrity 13(4): 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, N. V. (2013) ‘Globalization and higher education: changing trends in cross border education’, Analytical Reports in International Education 5(1): 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, N. V. and Martin, M. (Ed.) (2014) Governance reforms in higher education: a study of institutional autonomy in Asian countries, Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, N. V. and Malik, G. (2020) Report on the International Seminar on Governance and Autonomy in Higher Education. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration, British Council.

  • Wickramasinghe, V. (2018) ‘Higher education in state universities in Sri Lanka—review of higher education since colonial past through international funding for development’, International Journal of Educational Management 32(3): 463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992) Governance and development (English), Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012a) Tertiary education governance: data collection and assessment tool on governance in tertiary education, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group, Systems Approach for Better Results (SABER).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012b) Universities through the looking glass: benchmarking university governance to enable higher education modernization in MENA (English), Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2013) Addressing governance at the center of higher education reforms in Armenia, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmin, N. (2018) ‘The governance of higher education of Bangladesh through the lens of new public management’, IJAEDU-International E-journal of Advances in Education 5(10): 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegements

This research was carried out with funding from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The ADB and its local experts have also provided essential feedbacks on the draft of this research. The authors are grateful for such support. We thank to two reviewers for their invaluable comments for the quality of this article. In addition, we would acknowledge the contributions from the team of local experts, including Rajendra D. Joshi of Nepal, Jandhyala B. G. Tilak of India, Tilakaratne A. Piyasiri of Sri Lanka, and Mozahar M. Ali of Bangladesh. They provided abundant local information and opinions for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Measures and Ratings for Institutional Autonomy, by Country

Appendix: Measures and Ratings for Institutional Autonomy, by Country

See Table 5.

Table 5 In respective countries, are universities guaranteed autonomy for each item by legislation?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, J.C., Li, X., Nam, I. et al. Institutional Autonomy and Capacity of Higher Education Governance in South Asia: A Comparative Perspective. High Educ Policy 35, 414–438 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00220-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00220-y

Keywords

Navigation