In 2017, China released its building list of First-class Universities and First-class Subjects (Double First classes), which should get great support for development for many years into the future. This paper examines the academic performance of eight universities that are currently listed as having First-class Subjects of economics, in international papers and domestic papers, and compares their academic performance with another eight non-listed universities. The comparison shows that in general only three listed universities have obvious advantages among the 16 sample universities, while four listed universities do not show advantages, with one of them unexpectedly lagging behind. In contrast, several non-listed universities perform obviously better among the sample universities. In addition, several other aspects of this Double First-class list are also found to be less objective, scientific, or rigorous.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altbach, P.G. (2016) ‘Chinese higher education: “Glass ceiling” and “feet of clay”’, International Higher Education (86): 11–13.
Allen, R.M. (2017) ‘A Comparison of China’s “Ivy League” to other peer groupings through global university rankings’, Journal of Studies in International Education 21(5): 395–411.
Chen, X. (2006) ‘Ideal-oriented policy making: Analysis on “Project 985” policy process’, Peking University Education Review 4(1): 145–157 (in Chinese).
He, S. (2019) ‘Thoughts on the self-defining subject policy in the construction of Double First-classes’, Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education (7): 7–12 (in Chinese).
Huang, F. (2015) ‘Building the world-class research universities: A case study of China’, Higher Education 70: 203–215.
Liu, X. (2020) ‘The development of private universities in socialist China’, Higher Education Policy 33: 1–19.
Ministry of Education, Ministry of Finance, and the National Development and Reform Commission. (2017) ‘Response to reporters: Firmly promote the building of world First-class Universities and First-class Subjects with Chinese characteristics’, China Higher Education (19): 8–10 (in Chinese).
Peters, M.A. and Besley, T. (2018) ‘China’s double first-class university strategy: 双一流’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(12): 1075–1079.
Song, J. (2018) ‘Creating world-class universities in China: Strategies and impacts at a renowned research university’, Higher Education 75 (4): 729–742.
Wang, Q., Zhang, T. and Zhang, L. (2017) ‘From “Project 211” to “Double First-classes”: The Internal mechanism of the policy change of building world-class university in China’, Social Scientist (11): 121–127 (in Chinese).
Wu, X. (2016) ‘Research on the impact of funding resource on university performance’, Master’s Degree Thesis from Zhejiang University (in Chinese).
Yang, R. (2016) ‘Toxic academic culture in East Asia’, International Higher Education (84): 15–16.
Yu, X. and Gao, Z. (2010) ‘An updated ranking of the economic research institutions in China (2000–2009)’, China Economic Review 21: 571–581.
Zhang, C. and Chen, X. (2014) ‘Analyzing the credibility of China’s applied economics research’, World Economy (1): 120–133 (in Chinese).
Zhang, G. and Chen, X. (2006) ‘The interior-input feature in domestic educational policy process: Grounded on an empirical research on “Project 211” policy-making’, Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education (8): 1–4 (in Chinese).
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to the editor (Professor Jeroen Huisman) and two anonymous reviewers whose comments have greatly improved the paper. However, any remaining errors are ours. In addition, the views expressed herein are ours and should not be attributed to our affiliations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z. Evaluating China’s Double First-Class Project from the Perspective of Economics. High Educ Policy 35, 234–254 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00207-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00207-9