Abstract
Chile implemented a new national quality assurance system for its higher education institutions in 2006 that included a set of policies and procedures for graduate education. Ten years after its implementation, this study looks at the perceived alignments and misalignments between the national accreditation goals and the graduate programs’ visions of improvement. By using the concept of loosely coupled systems, we studied eight science and technology master’s and doctoral programs at four research-oriented Chilean universities. In total, we conducted 26 interviews, visited all campus sites, and analyzed related documents. The results indicate that the national accreditation system improved academic quality across programs by strengthening the influence of university central administrations and raising faculty productivity standards. In particular, the accreditation meant a push for internationalization, which was welcomed at all institutional levels. However, after a decade, the accreditation system seems misaligned with programs’ new improvement efforts, such as the promotion of multidisciplinary work. To some extent, accreditation standards, based on strong disciplinary orientations, penalize a diverse student body and curricular innovation and do not consider the challenges of publishing multidisciplinary research.

Source: Higher Education Information Service (SIES, 2016).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackers, L., Gill, B. and Guth, J. (2008) Doctoral Mobility in the Social Sciences, Liverpool: University of Liverpool, Norface Era-Net, European Law and Policy Research Group.
Báez, M., Lagos, J., Pérez, C., Abarca, M., Paredes, S., Audibert, M. and Ampuero, N. (2013) ‘Situación actual de la transición y articulación entre el pregrado y postgrado en las universidades chilenas’, in Articulación entre el pregrado y postgrado: Experiencias universitarias, Santiago, Chile: CINDA, pp. 49–94.
Bendermacher, G.W.G., Oude Egbrink, M.G.A., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P. and Dolmans, D.H.J.M. (2017) ‘Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review’, Higher Education 73(1): 39–60.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2012) ‘Thematic analysis’, in H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf and K. J. Sher (eds.) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological), Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, pp. 57–71.
Busco, C., Dooner, C. and d’Alencon, A. (2018) ‘Universidad de Chile: self-assessment and its effects on university’s management’, Higher Education 75(3): 431–447.
Byun, K., Chu, H., Kim, M., Park, I., Kim, S. and Jung, J. (2011) ‘English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality’, Higher Education 62(4): 431–449.
Celis, S. and Véliz, D. (2017) La acreditación como agente de mejora continua en los programas de postgrado en ciencia y tecnología. Cuaderno de Investigación Nº5, Santiago de Chile: Comisión Nacional de Acreditación.
Comisión Nacional de Acreditación (CNA) (2016a) ‘Cuenta Pública 2015’. CNA report, May. https://www.cnachile.cl/. Accessed 9 March 2020.
Comisión Nacional de Acreditación (CNA) (2016b) ‘Operacionalización de Criterios de Evaluación para la Acreditación de Programas de Postgrado: Doctorado, Magíster Académico y Magíster Profesional’. CNA report, January. https://www.cnachile.cl/. Accessed 9 March 2020.
Comisión Nacional de Acreditación (CNA) (2017) ‘Cuenta Pública 2016’. CNA report, May. https://www.cnachile.cl/. Accessed 20 March 2020.
Conrad, C.F. (1978) ‘A grounded theory of academic change’, Sociology of Education 51(2): 101–112.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eckel, P.D. and Kezar, A. J. (2003) Taking the Reins: Institutional Transformation in Higher Education, Westport, CT: Praeger.
Ewell, P. (2008) U.S. Accreditation and the Future of Quality Assurance: A Tenth Anniversary Report from The Council for Higher Education Accreditation, Washington, D.C.: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R. and Didegah, F. (2012) ‘Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(2): 323–335.
Gardner, S.K. (2008) ‘“What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education’, The Journal of Higher Education 79(3): 326–350.
Glänzel, W. (2001) ‘National characteristics in international scientific coauthorship relations’, Scientometrics 51(1): 69–115.
Golde, C.M. (2005) ‘The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments’, The Journal of Higher Education (Columbus, Ohio) 76(6): 669–700.
Hogan, A., Zippel, K., Frehill, L. and Kramer, L. (2010) Report of the International Workshop on International Research Collaboration, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Hsu, Y.P. (2019) ‘The evolution of quality assurance in higher education in Taiwan: The changes and the effects at different levels’, Higher Education Policy 32: 339–357.
Marginson, S. (1997) ‘Steering from a distance. Power relations in Australian higher education’, Higher Education 34: 63–80.
Maxwell, J.A. (1996) Qualitative Research Design: An Interpretative Approach, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MINEDUC, División de Educación Superior (2014) Estudio Evaluativo de un conjunto de Programas Doctorales chilenos 2013–2014. MINEDUC report, 4 December. http://dfi.mineduc.cl/usuarios/MECESUP/File/2018/publicaciones/estudio-doctorados/EstudioDoctorados260418.pdf. Accessed 9 January 2020.
Munita J.M. and Reyes B.J. (2012) El sistema de postgrado en Chile: Evolución y proyecciones para las universidades del Consejo de Rectores. Consejo de Rectores de las Universidades Chilenas (CRUCH) report, March. http://www.consejoderectores.cl/. Accessed 9 January 2020.
Olavarría, J. (2012) Trayectoria laboral de los doctorados nacionales. Consejo Nacional de Innovación para el Desarrollo (CNID) report, 9 December. http://www.cnic.cl/. Accessed 9 January 2020.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978) The External Control Of Organizations. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Proctor, D. (2016) ‘The changing landscape of international education research’, International Higher Education 84: 19–21.
Sapir, A. and Oliver, A. (2017) ‘Loose coupling, conflict, and resistance: The case of IPR policy conflict in an Israeli university’, Higher Education 73(5): 709–724.
SIES (2016) Informe de matrícula 2007 a 2016. Ministerio de Educación (MINEDUC) report. http://www.mifuturo.cl. Accessed 30 March 2017.
SIES (2018) Informe de matrícula 2018. Ministerio de Educación (MINEDUC) report. https://www.mifuturo.cl/informes-de-matricula/. Accessed 20 March 2020.
Stark, J.S., Briggs, C.L. and Rowland-Poplawski, J. (2002) ‘Curriculum leadership roles of chairpersons in continuously planning departments’, Research in Higher Education 43(3): 329–356.
Vilgats, B. and Heidmets, M. (2011) ‘The impact of external quality assessment on universities: The Estonian experience’, Higher Education Policy 24(3): 331–346.
Weick, K.E. (1976) ‘Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly 21(1): 1–19.
Wells, R.M. and Wells, C. (2012) ‘System-designed graduate program review’, Research in Higher Education Journal 16: 1–23.
Woldegiyorgis, A.A., Proctor, D. and de Wit, H. (2018) ‘Internationalization of research: Key considerations and concerns’, Journal of Studies in International Education 22(2): 161–176.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Celis, S., Véliz, D. A Decade of Chilean Graduate Program Accreditation: A Push for Internationalization and Issues of Multidisciplinarity. High Educ Policy 35, 133–154 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00198-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00198-7