Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academic Freedom and World-Class Universities: A Virtuous Circle?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using empirical data from over 1500 respondents (drawn from across the UK) to a survey on academic freedom, and the Times Higher’s World University Rankings, this paper is a comparative assessment of the relationship between professed levels of de facto protection for academic freedom by teaching and research staff in individual UK universities, and their institution’s excellence, as evinced by world university rankings. The study reveals that normative protection for academic freedom is strongest in Russell Group universities and weakest in post-1992 institutions. Additionally, the professed level of protection for academic freedom reported by respondents to the survey is shown to have a positive relationship with the World Rankings’ positions of their institutions. Furthermore, the study considers whether academic freedom may be a prerequisite for, or defining characteristic of, a world-class university. Finally, the paper assesses the possible policy implications of this research for universities and their leaders, and higher educational policy makers, within the UK and beyond, seeking to improve the Times Higher’s World Ranking positions of their institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I. and Elander, C. (2009) ‘Brave New World: Higher Education Reform in Finland’, Higher Education Management and Policy 21(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. and Kayrooz, C. (2003) ‘Understanding academic freedom: the views of social scientists’, Higher Research and Development 22(3): 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (1999) ‘The logic of mass higher education’, Tertiary Education and Management 5(2): 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (2001) ‘Academic freedom: International realities and challenges’,  Higher Education 41(1/2): 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (2011) ‘The Past, Present, and Future of the Research University’, in P. Altbach and J. Salmi (eds) The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities, Washington: The World Bank, pp. 11–32.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler, S. and Bolsmann, C. (2012) ‘University ranking as social exclusion’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 33(2): 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1988) ‘Limits to Academic Freedom: Imposed-Upon or Self-Imposed?’, in M. Tight (ed.) Academic Freedom and Responsibility, Buckingham: SRHE/OU Press, pp. 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, G. (2017) ‘The Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions: Limitations, legitimacy, and value conflict’, Higher Education 73(2): 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baty, P. (2014) ‘The Times Higher Education World University Rankings, 2004–2012’, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 13(1): 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2000) ‘The Life Cycle of Academic Management Fads’, The Journal of Higher Education 71(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, R. (2000) ‘Fantasy Higher Education: University and college league tables’, Quality in Higher Education 6(1): 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, K. (1972) ‘On Tenure’, Academe 58(4): 381–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2001) ‘The governance of the new universities: Do we need to think again?’ Perspectives 5(1): 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, M., and Davis, C. (1982) ‘On the origins of the .05 level of statistical significance’, American Psychologist 37(5): 553–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Innovations and Skills (2015) Fulfilling our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice (Cm 9141), London: Department of Business, Innovations and Skills: Open Government License (OGL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham, J. (2017) ‘Employability and higher education: the follies of the “Productivity Challenge” in the Teaching Excellence Framework’, Journal of Education Policy 32(5): 628–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M., Gall, J. and Borg, W. (2007) Educational research: An introduction, Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2008) ‘Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review’, Quality in Higher Education 14(3): 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwell, M., Rubinstein, E., Hayes, W., and Olds, C. (1992) ‘Summarising Monte Carlo results in methodological research: the One and Two factor fixed effects ANOVA cases’, Journal of Education Statistics 17(4): 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Education and Skills Committee (2005) UK e-University: Third Report of Session 2004–05 (HC489), London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karran, T. (2009) ‘Academic Freedom in Europe: Time for a Magna Charta?’, Higher Education Policy 22(2): 163–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latif, M. (2014) ‘Academic freedom: problems in conceptualization and research’, Higher Education Research and Development 33(2): 399–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeds Beckett University (undated) accessed from: http://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/governance/ [accessed 20th July 2017]

  • Manan, W. (2000) ‘Academic freedom: Ethical implications and civic responsibilities’, in G. Neave (ed.) The universities’ responsibilities to society: International perspectives, Kidlington: Elsevier Science, pp. 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007) ‘Rankings: Marketing Mana or Menace? The Big Picture’. Paper presented at the 16th Annual New Zealand International Education Conference; 8–10 August, Christchurch, New Zealand.

  • Moed, H. (2017) ‘A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings’, Scientometrics 110(2): 967–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T., and Sage, D. (2015) ‘Perceptions of the UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2014’, Australian Universities Review 57(2): 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, M., Ingleton, C., and Hayter, M. (2008) ‘The Research Excellence Framework (REF): A major impediment to free and informed debate?’, International Journal of Nursing Studies 45: 487–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onchiri, S. (2013) ‘Conceptual Model on Application of Chi Square Test on Education and Social Sciences’, Educational Research and Reviews 8(15): 1231–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A. (2013) ‘Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science?’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A.,176(3): 609–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., Marginson, S. (2013) ‘University Rankings in Critical Perspective’, The Journal of Higher Education 84(4): 544-568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabban, D. (2001) “Academic Freedom, Individual or Institutional?”, Academe 87(6): 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauhvargers, A. (2013) Global University Rankings And Their Impact — Report II, Brussels: EUA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosovsky, H. (2014) ‘Researh universities: American Exceptionalism?’, Carnegie Reporter: Special Issue 7(3): 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkind, N. (2004) ‘Two groups too many? Try analysis of variance’, in L. Shaw, M. Crouppen, D. Axelsen, and L. Lech (eds.) Statistics for people who think they hate statistics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmi, J., and Saroyan, A. (2007) ‘League Tables as Policy Instruments: Uses and Misuses’, Higher Education Management and Policy 19(2): 31–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (1999) ‘Governance and management in universities: The way we live now’, Journal of Education Policy 14(3): 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2002) ‘Re-balancing modern concepts of university governance’, Higher Education Quarterly 56(3): 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J., and Toutkoushian, R. (2011) ‘The Past, Present, and Future of University Rankings’, in J. Shin, R. Toutkoushian and U. Teichler (eds.) University Rankings: Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Ward, V. and House, A. (2011) ‘“Impact” in the proposals for the UK’s Research Excellence Framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy’, Research Policy 40(10): 1369–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. (2015) ‘Multicolinearity and Indicator Redundancy Problem in World University Rankings: An Example Using Times Higher Education World University Ranking 2013–2014 Data’, Higher Education Quarterly 69(2):158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Durham (Undated) accessed from: https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/university.calendar/StatutesUniversityofDurham2011.pdf [Accessed: 20th July 2017]

  • University of Harvard (1970) University-Wide Statement on Rights and Responsibilities, accessed from: http://provost.harvard.edu/university-wide-statement-rights-and-responsibilities [Accessed 20th July 2017]

  • University of Oxford (2013) Strategic Plan 2013 to 2018, accessed from https://www.ox.ac.uk/about/organisation/strategic-plan?wssl=1 [Accessed 20th July 2017]

  • Watermeyer, R. (2016) ‘Impact in the REF: issues and obstacles’, Studies in Higher Education 41(2): 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. and Su, F. (2017) ‘What makes an excellent lecturer? Academics’ perspectives on the discourse of “teaching excellence” in higher education’, Teaching In Higher Education 22(4): 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. (2000) “Academic Freedom and University Autonomy”, in G. Neave (ed.) The Universities’ Responsibilities to Society: International Perspectives, Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2014) ‘Knowledge that counts: points systems and the governance of Danish universities’, in D. Smith and A. Griffith (eds.) Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies Of Changing Front-Line Work, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 294–338.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Patton, D., Kenney, M. (2013) ‘Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project’, Research Policy 42: 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

    Terence Karran

  2. Higher Education Research Institute, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

    Lucy Mallinson

Authors
  1. Terence Karran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucy Mallinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence Karran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karran, T., Mallinson, L. Academic Freedom and World-Class Universities: A Virtuous Circle?. High Educ Policy 32, 397–417 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0087-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0087-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation