Skip to main content

Much Ado About Nothing? An Analysis of Prioritization at Six Canadian Universities

A Correction to this article was published on 03 June 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

This research investigates organizational change in six Canadian universities framed as “prioritization,” which is a ranking method using predefined metrics for the comprehensive review and evaluation of academic and administrative programs. Our research found the following: (a) no prioritization process reached the implementation stage; (b) financial performance was not significantly impacted; (c) differences in pace, sequencing, and linearity had little to no impact on the outcomes; (d) the process of prioritization itself introduced political hardship to university leadership, including broad mistrust. Our analysis shows that prioritization initiatives have not provided a directly attributable impact on the outcomes at each of the universities. In short, there was much ado about nothing. Implications for universities will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Change history

References

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant No. 430-2015-00885).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Kotsopoulos.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Definitions of Financial Ratios

Appendix: Definitions of Financial Ratios

Performance

$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{Net}}\;{\text{Income/Loss}} = \frac{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{Revenues}} - {\text{Expenses}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{Revenues}}}} \\ & {\text{Net}}\;{\text{Operating}}\;{\text{Revenues}} = \frac{{{\text{Cash}}\;{\text{from}}\;{\text{Operating}}\;{\text{Activities}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{Revenues}}}} \\ \end{aligned}$$

Liquidity

$${\text{Primary}}\;{\text{Reserve}} = \frac{{{\text{Expendable}}\;{\text{Net}}\;{\text{Assets}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{Expenses}}}}$$

Leverage

$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{Interest}}\;{\text{Burden}} = \frac{{{\text{Interest}}\;{\text{Expense}}}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{Expenses}} - {\text{Depreciation}}}} \\ & {\text{Viability}} = \frac{{{\text{Expendable}}\;{\text{Net}}\;{\text{Assets}}}}{{{\text{Long}}\;{\text{Term}}\;{\text{Debt}}}} \\ \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotsopoulos, D., McKee, J., Timmons, V. et al. Much Ado About Nothing? An Analysis of Prioritization at Six Canadian Universities. High Educ Policy 34, 254–276 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-00132-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-00132-y

Keywords

  • academic
  • finance
  • governance
  • higher education planning
  • prioritization
  • strategic planning