Governing Higher Education: The PURE Data System and the Management of the Bibliometric Self
This article reflects on the ‘quantified self at work’ (Moore and Robinson in New Media Soc 18(11):2774–2792, 2016), neoliberal government (Miller and Rose in Econ Soc 19(1):1–31, 1990; Rose and Miller in Br J Sociol 43(2):173–205, 1992; Ball in J Educ Policy 18(2):215–228, 2003), and the use of bibliometric technologies that record research output. It charts and reflects upon the development of the ‘bibliometric self’ by presenting an analysis of the case of PURE – a data management system increasingly used in higher education. PURE is an important case to study because it (1) requires academics to engage with the software and actively update their own profiles and (2) aims to capture all academic activities and not only publication records. Its design – both category-bound but also open to other inputs – allows it to become a ‘total’ management system. It is becoming central to the work of research managers and heads of departments who rely on PURE to provide data for internal and external assessments (such as the UK’s Research Excellence Framework). The article shows how users engage with the software as well as the context in which PURE was designed and continues to develop. It concludes by reiterating the need for a critical but hands-on engagement with the everyday technologies in use in higher education policy.
Keywordshigher education PURE governance policy instruments performativity bibliometrics
This work was supported by the European Commission FP7 People programme: Marie Curie Initial Training Network UNIKE (Universities in the Knowledge Economy) under Grant Agreement Number 317452.
- Aarhus University. (undated) Research Strategy, internal communication.Google Scholar
- Altbach, P. and de Wit, H. (2018) ‘Too much academic research is being published’, University World News, 7 September. http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20180905095203579. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
- Dean, M. (2010) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Elsevier. (2016) Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/. Retrieved 15 August 2016.
- European Summer School for Scientometrics. (undated). http://www.scientometrics-school.eu/. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
- Ozga, J. (2016)’ Trust in numbers? Digital education governance and the inspection process’, European Educational Research Journal 15(1): 69–81.Google Scholar
- Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P., Segerholm, C. and Simola, H. (eds) (2011) Fabricating quality in education: data and governance in Europe, Abdingdo, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Peters, M. (1996) Poststructuralism, politics, and education. Critical studies in education and culture, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
- Regeringen. (2009) AFTALE mellem regeringen (Venstre og Det Konservative Folkeparti), Socialdemokraterne, Dansk Folkeparti og Det Radikale Venstre om ny model for fordelingen af basismidler til universiteterne 30. juni 2009. http://ufm.dk/uddannelse-og-institutioner/videregaende-uddannelse/universiteter/okonomi/basismidler-efter-kvalitet/aftale-om-basismidler-efter-resultat.pdf. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
- Regeringen. (2006) Fremgang, fornyelse og trykhed. Strategi for Danmark i den globale økonomi – de vigtigste initiativer. http://www.stm.dk/multimedia/Fremgang_fornyelse_og_tryghed.pdf. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
- Scott, J.C. (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, Binghamton, NY: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Sivertsen, G. and Schneider, J. (2012) Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator, Oslo: NIFU Report 17/2012.Google Scholar
- Wilsdon, J. (2016) The metric tide: independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management, London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wright, S. (2009) ‘What counts? The skewing effects of research assessment systems’, Nordisk Pedagogik 29(Special): 18–33.Google Scholar
- Wright, S. and Shore, C. (eds) (2017) Death of the public university? Uncertain futures for higher education in the knowledge economy (vol 3), New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar