Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

All that Glitters is Not Gold: the Surrogate Use of University Spin-Offs. Insights from Italy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The weak performance of Italian universities in for-profit third mission activities can be explained by taking into account different interrelated factors at national, local and individual level. The purpose of this article is to introduce and develop a specific argument: the low success and the ineffectiveness of universities’ third mission may be understandable also looking at the surrogate use through which professors and researchers exploit some third mission tools. In particular, the discussion concerns university spin-off companies, a typical for-profit tool that often can be activated for goals other than the official ones. Through three case studies carried out in three Italian universities, the article aims to shed light on actual reasons behind the engagement in a spin-off and to put the surrogate use of this tool in relation to old problems and constraints of the Italian university system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algieri, B., Aquino, A. and Succurro, M. (2013) ‘Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: the case of Italy’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 38(4): 382–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2001) ‘University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions’, International Journal of Management Reviews 3(4): 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, R., Quigley, J.M. and Wilhelmson, M. (2004) ‘University decentralization as regional policy: the Swedish experiment’, Journal of Economic Geography 4(4): 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, T.C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J. and D’Este, P. (2008), ‘When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions’, Journal of Management Studies 45(8): 1424–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Varga, A. and Acs, Z. (1997) ‘Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations’, Journal of urban economics 42(3): 422–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANVUR (2016) Rapporto biennale sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca, ANVUR — Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del sistema Universitario e della Ricerca, Roma.

  • Audretsch, D. (2000) Is university entrepreneurship different?, Mimeo, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnasco, A. (1977) Tre Italie. La problematica etrritoriale dello sviluppo italiano, Bologna: il Mulino.

  • Baldini, N., Fini, R. and Grimaldi, R. (2015) ‘The Transition toward Entrepreneurial Universities. an assessment of academic entrepreneurship in Italy’, in A.N. Link, S.S. Siegel and M. Wright (eds.). The Chicago handbook of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 97–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, J. and Spiegel, M. (1992) ‘The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence form Aggregate Cross-Country Regional US Data’, CV Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University Working Papers, 92–46.

  • Bercovitz, J. and Feldman, M. (2003) ‘Technology transfer and the academic department: who participates and why?’ Working Paper, DRUID summer conference.

  • Bertamino, F., Bronzini, R., De Maggio and M., Revelli, D. (2016) ‘Local policies for innovation: The case of technology districts in Italy’, Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers), 313.

  • Bolzani, D., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R. and Sobrero, M. (2014) ‘University spin-offs and their impact: Longitudinal evidence from Italy’, Economia e politica industriale 4: 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Fay, D. and Slade, C.P. (2013) ‘Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 38(1): 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2001), ‘Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered’, Papers in Regional Science 80(3): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, S. M. and Feldman, M. P. (2012) ‘The engaged university’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 37(2): 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G., Regini, M. and Turri, M. (2016) Changing Governance in Universities: Italian Higher Education in Comparative Perspective, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F. and Piccaluga, A. (2016) ‘The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: towards the third mission in Italy’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 41(4): 753–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton, P. and Goddard, J. (2000) ‘The response of higher education institutions to regional needs’, European Journal of Education 35(4): 475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, V. and Piccaluga, A. (2000) ‘Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy’, R&D Management 30(4): 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B. and Moray, N. (2004) ‘A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off’, Journal of Business Venturing 19(1): 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E. and Vohora, A. (2005) ‘Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions’, Journal of Business Venturing 20(2): 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G. and Piva, E. (2008) ‘Strengths and weaknesses of academic startups: a conceptual model’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55(1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R. (2005) ‘The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links’, Research Policy 34(3): 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degroof, J.J. and Roberts, E.B. (2004) ‘Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 29(3): 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P. and Perkmann, M. (2011) ‘Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations’, Journal of Technology Transfer 36(3): 316–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokovic, D. and Souitaris, V. (2008) ‘Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 33(3): 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, J. and Goldstein, H.A. (2007), ‘Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: a review of current approaches’, International Regional Science Review 30(1): 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) ‘The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2″ to a Triple Helix of university — industry — government relations’, Research Policy 29(2): 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002) Benchmarking national research policies: the impact of RTD on competitiveness and employment (IRCE), Brussels: European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Inno-policy TrendChart — Policy trend and appraisal report—Italy 2007, http://www.proinno-europe.eu

  • Eurostat (2017) Eurostat regional yearbook 2017, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Eurostat_regional_yearbook

  • Faggian, A. and McCann, P. (2009) ‘Universities, agglomerations and graduate human capital mobility’, Journal of Economic and Social Geography 100(2): 210–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Grimaldi, R. and Sobrero, M. (2009) ‘Factors fostering academic to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 34(4): 380–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florax, R. (1992) The university: a regional booster? Economic impacts of academic knowledge infrastructure, Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido-Yserte, R. and Gallo-Rivera, M.T. (2010) ‘The impact of the university upon local economy: three methods to estimate demand-side effects’, The Annals of Regional Science 44(1): 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A. and Muscio, A. (2009) ‘The governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature’, Minerva 47(1): 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardini, A. (2012) ‘Andante ma non troppo. L’apertura delle università italiane alle imprese’, Stato e Mercato 96(3): 465–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardini, A. (2015) Squarci nell’avorio. Le università italiane e l’innovazione economica, Firenze: Firenze University Press.

  • Gherardini, A. and Nucciotti, A. (2017) ‘Yesterday’s giants and invisible colleges of today. A study on the ‘knowledge transfer’ scientific domain’, Scientometrics 112(1): 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granieri, M. (2010) La gestione della proprietà intellettuale nella ricerca universitaria. Invenzioni accademiche e trasferimento tecnologico, Bologna: il Mulino.

  • Gulbrandsen, M. and Slipersæter, S. (2007) ‘The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model’, in A. Bonaccorsi, C. Daraio (eds.) Universities and strategic knowledge creation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 112–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R.T. and Leitch, C. (2010) ‘Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK’, Regional Studies 44(9): 1241–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B. (1989) ‘Real effects of academic research’, The American Economic Review 79(5): 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R. (2003) ‘Lambert review of business-university collaboration: Final report’, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

  • Laredo, P. (2007) ‘Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities?’, Higher Education Policy 20(4): 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (2007) ‘Knowledge networks and careers: academic scientists in industry — university links’, Journal of Management Studies 44(6): 993–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (2011) ‘What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization:‘Gold’,‘ribbon’or ‘puzzle’?’, Research Policy 40(10): 1354–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeri, F. and Piccaluga, A. (2014) ‘Le imprese spin-off della ricerca pubblica in Italia: cosa fare dopo le prime mille?’, Sinergie 17(1): 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeroni, M. and Piccaluga, A. (2003) ‘Towards the entrepreneurial university’, Local Economy 18(1): 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A. and Wright, M. (2005) ‘Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies’, Research Policy 34(7): 1043–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Wright, M. and Franklin, S. (2003). ‘Technology transfer and universities′ spin-out strategies’, Small Business Economics 20(2): 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. (1998) ‘On the mechanics of economic development’, Econometric Society Monographs 29(1): 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masiello, B., Izzo, F. and Canoro, C. (2015) ‘The structural, relational and cognitive configuration of innovation networks between SMEs and public research organisations’, International Small Business Journal 33(2): 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2003) ‘Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research–based ventures and public support mechanisms’, R&D Management 33(2): 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, V. (2010) ‘Technological districts: policy criteria and regional industrial features in Italy’, Economia Politica 27(1): 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migliori, S. (2016) Gli spin-off universitari nella loro dimensione di mercato, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A. and Duran, X. (2002) Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities, Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscati, R. and Vaira, M. (eds.) (2008) L’università di fronte al cambiamento. Realizzazioni, problemi, prospettive, Bologna: il Mulino.

  • Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B. and Ziedonis, A. (2004) Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. and Kolev, J. (2015) ‘An Entrepreneur’s Guide to the University’, in A.N. Link, S.S. Siegel and M. Wright (eds.). The Chicago handbook of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 97–137.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., Wright, M. and Clarysse, B. (2008) ‘University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe’, Science and Public Policy 35(2): 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2000) The Universities’ Responsibilities to Society: International Perspectives. Issues in Higher Education Series, Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. and Van Vught, F. (1991) Prometheus bound: the changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Benchmarking industry-science relations, OECD: Paris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_outlook-2014-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R.P., Chugh, H. and Allen, T.J. (2008) ‘Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework’, Journal of Technology Transfer 33(6): 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R. Geuna, A., Hughes A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A. and Sobrero, M.S. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations’, Research Policy 42(2): 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P.H. and Siegel, D.S. (2006), ‘The effectiveness of university technology transfer’, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 2(2): 77–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B. and Nlemvo, F. (2003) ‘Toward a typology of university spin-offs’, Small Business Economics 21(4): 355–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponds, R., Oort, F.V. and Frenken, K. (2009) ‘Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach’, Journal of Economic Geography 10(2): 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J.B. and McDougall, P.P. (2005) ‘University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing 20(3): 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaciotti, L. and Daniele, C. (eds.) (2015) Protagonisti dell’ecosistema dell’innovazione? XII rapport Netval sulla valorizzazione della Ricerca Pubblica Italiana, Pavia: Netval — Network per la Valorizzazione della Ricerca Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S. and Wright, M. (2014) ‘The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures’, Research Policy 43(1): 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E. and Wright, M. (2015) ‘How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective’, Journal of Technology Transfer 40(5): 782–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, U. (2015) ‘Why do scientists create academic spin-offs? The influence of the context’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 40(2): 198–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E.B. (1991) Entrepreneurs in high technology: lessons from MIT and beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E.B. and Wainer, H.A. (1971) ‘Some characteristics of technical entrepreneurs’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 3(1): 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfo, S. and Finardi, U. (2014) ‘University Third mission in Italy: organization, faculty attitude and academic specialization’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 39(3), 472–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S.D. and Jiang, L. (2007) ‘University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature’, Industrial and Corporate Change 16(4): 691–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. (2005) ‘A typology of public engagement mechanisms’, Science, Technology & Human Values 30(2): 251–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, E. (2006) ‘Il finanziamento delle imprese Spin-off. Un confronto tra Italia e Regno Unito’, Ceris-Cnr, WP, 12: 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2002) ‘Selling university technology: patterns from MIT’, Management Science 48(1), 122–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S.A. (2004) Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, A. and Theves, J. (2006) Strategic management of university research activities. Methodological guide, Lugano: Prime-OEU Observatory of the European University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T. and Kroll, H. (2016) ‘Universities’ effects on regional GDP and unemployment: The case of Germany’, Papers in Regional Science 95(3): 467–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. and Link, A. (2003) ‘Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study’, Research Policy 32(1): 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, K. and Coornes P. (1998) ‘The local economic impact of higher education: an overview of methods and practice’, AIR Professional File 67(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E. and Ding, W. W. (2006) ‘The social structural determinants of academic entrepreneurship: an analysis of university scientists’ participation in commercial ventures’, American Journal of Sociology 112(1): 97–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A.A.C. and Mota, L. (2012) ‘A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university–industry links’, Scientometrics 93(3): 719–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Cagliari (2009) Creatività, innovazione e trasferimento tecnologico, Atti del convegno del 15.12.2008, mimeo, http://veprints.unica.it/398/1/innovazione.pdf.

  • University of Florence (2006) Il Bilancio Sociale dell?università degli Studi di Firenze 2006, mimeo, https://www.unifi.it/upload/sub/bilancio/bilancio_sociale_fup_2006.pdf.

  • University of Turin (2016) Rapporto di sostenibilità 2015/2016, Torino, https://www.unito.it/sites/default/files/rapporto_sostenibilita_2015_2016.pdf.

  • University of Turin (2017) Unito Focus 2017, http://politichediateneounito.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/unito_FOCUS_web.pdf.

  • Vacca, V.P. (2013) ‘Financing innovation in Italy: an analysis of venture capital and private equity investments’, Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional papers): 209.

  • Valero, A. and Van Reenen, J. (2016) ‘The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe’, No 22501, NBER Working Paper from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Vandenbussche, J., Aghion, P. and Meghir, C. (2006) ‘Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital’, Journal of Economic Growth 11(2): 97–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VeM – Venture Capital Monitor (2014) Rapporto Italia 2014, http://www.privateequitymonitor.it/attach/vem_2014.pdf.

  • Viesti, G. (ed.) (2016) Università in declino. Un’indagine sugli atenei da Nord a Sud, Roma: Donzelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visintin, F. and Pittino, D. (2014) ‘Founding team composition and early performance of university — Based spin-off companies’, Technovation 34(1): 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visintin, F. and Pittino, D. (eds.) (2016) Fast growing firms in a slow growth economy: institutional conditions for innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohora, A., Wright, M. and Lockett, A. (2004) ‘Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies’, Research Policy 33(1): 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J. and Wright, M. (2011) ‘The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs’, Research Policy 40(8): 1128–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P. and Lockett, A. (2007) Academic entrepreneurship in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (2003) Case study research: design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A., Van de Velde, E. and Larraneta, B. (2007) ‘Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs’, Industrial and Corporate Change 16(4): 569–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Culture, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Davide Donatiello

  2. Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Alberto Gherardini

Authors
  1. Davide Donatiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Gherardini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Donatiello.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3

Table 3 List of interviewed for each case study
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donatiello, D., Gherardini, A. All that Glitters is Not Gold: the Surrogate Use of University Spin-Offs. Insights from Italy. High Educ Policy 32, 203–226 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0079-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0079-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation