Abstract
This paper investigates the migration of Asia-born academics from traditional centers in the West to Singapore, a rapidly developing education hub in Southeast Asia. We argue that such movement can be seen as a form of quasi-return, where migrant faculty look for places where they can be “close enough” to aging parents and family, while working in an institution that is “good enough” to continue research work. This position leads to conflicting notions of social mobility, when defined in terms of professional prestige and status. While interviewees perceived their move to Singapore as a form of upward mobility when compared to colleagues within their home countries, they simultaneously worried about their downward mobility compared to peers who had remained in the West. Such perceptions shape their decision to leave Singapore in the future, reinforcing current university hierarchies, where institutions in the USA and Europe continue to dominate notions of academic prestige.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackers, L. (2005) ‘Moving people and knowledge: scientific mobility in the European Union’, International Migration, 43(5): 99–132.
Ackers, L. (2008) ‘Internationalisation, mobility and metrics: a new form of indirect discrimination’? Minerva, 46(4): 411–435.
Ahmed, S. (1999) ‘Home and away: narratives of migration and estrangement’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3): 329–347.
Alberts, H.C. and Hazen, H.D. (2005) “There are always two voices…”: international students’ intentions to stay in the united states or return to their home countries’, International Migration, 43(3): 132–153.
Altbach, P. (2006) ‘Globalization and the university: realities in an unequal world’, in J. Forest and P. Altbach (eds.) International Handbook of Higher Education, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 121–139.
Altbach, P. (2009) ‘Peripheries and centers: research universities in developing countries’, Asia Pacific Education Review, 10: 15–27.
Altbach, P. and Balan, J. (2007) World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bozeman, B. Dietz, J.J. and Gaughan M. (2001) ‘Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation’, International Journal of Technology Management 22(7/8): 716–740.
Carrozza, C. and Minucci S. (2014) ‘Keep on movin’? Research mobility’s meanings for Italian early-stage researchers’, Higher Education Policy, 27(4): 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.23.
Cerna, L. (2016) Immigration Policies and the Global Competition for Talent, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chou, M-H., Kamola I. and Pietsch, T. (2016) The Transnational Politics of Higher Education: Contesting the Global/Transforming the Local, Routledge: Abingdon.
Cohen, E. (1977) ‘Expatriate communities’, Current Sociology, 24(3): 5–90.
Colic-Peisker, V. (2010) ‘Free floating in the cosmopolis? Exploring the identity-belonging of transnational knowledge workers’, Global Networks, 10(4): 467–489.
Currie, J., Vidovich, L. and Yang R. (2008) ‘Countability not answerability? Accountability in Hong Kong and Singapore universities’, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(1): 67–85.
Espiritu, Y.L. (2003) Home Bound: Filipino American Lives Across Cultures, Communities, and Countries, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Fontes, M., Videira P. and Calapez, T. (2013) ‘The impact of long-term scientific mobility on the creation of persistent knowledge networks’, Mobilities, 8(3): 440–465.
Geddie, K. (2013) ‘The transnational ties that bind: relationship considerations for graduating international science and engineering research students’, Population, Space and Place, 19: 196–208.
Gopinathan, S. and Lee, M.H. (2011) ‘Challenging and co-opting globalisation: Singapore’s strategies in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3): 287–299.
Gu, Y. (2000) ‘Ph.D.s who have studied abroad vie for jobs’, Chinese Education & Society, 33(5): 57.
Guth, J. and Gill, B. (2008) ‘Motivations in east–west doctoral mobility: revisiting the question of brain drain’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(5): 825–841.
Hindman, H. (2009) ‘Cosmopolitan codifications: elites, expatriates, and difference in Kathmandu, Nepal’, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 16(3): 249–270.
Jons, H. and Hoyler, M.M. (2013) ‘Global geographies of higher education: the perspective of world university rankings’, Geoforum, 46: 43–59.
Kapur, D. (2005) Give Us Your Best and Your Brightest: The Global Hunt for Talent and its Impact on the Developing World, Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
Kim, S.K. (2016) ‘Western faculty ‘flight risk’ at a korean university and the complexities of internationalisation in Asian higher education’, Comparative Education, 52(1): 78–90.
Kou, A., van Wissen, L. van Dijk, J. and Bailey, A. (2015) ‘A life course approach to high-skilled migration: lived experiences of Indians in the Netherlands’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(10): 1644–1663.
King, R. and Raghuram, P.P. (2013) ‘International student migration: mapping the field and new research agendas’, Population, Space and Place, 19: 127–137.
Knight, J. (2011) ‘Education hubs: a fad, a brand, an innovation?’, Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(3): 221–240.
Lawrence, J.H., Celis, S., Kim, H.S., Lipson, S.K. and Tong, X. (2014) ‘To stay or not to stay: retention of Asian international faculty in STEM fields’, Higher Education, 67: 511–531.
Lee, J.T. (2014) ‘Education hubs and talent development: policymaking and implementation challenges’, Higher Education, 68: 807–823.
Lee, J.J. and Kim, D. (2010) ‘Brain gain or brain circulation? US doctoral recipients Returning to South Korea’, Higher Education, 59: 627–643.
Mahroum, S. (2000) ‘Scientists and global spaces’, Technology in Society, 22: 513–523.
Mallett, S. (2004) ‘Understanding home: a critical review of the literature’, The Sociological Review, 52(1): 62–89.
Marginson, S. and van der Wende, M. (2007) ‘To rank or to be ranked: the impact of global rankings in higher education’, Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4): 306–329.
Mosneaga, A. and Winther, L. (2013) ‘Emerging talents? International students before and after their career start in Denmark’, Population, Space and Place, 19: 181–195.
National Center for Education Statistics [NCES] (2006, May) 2004 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF:04) Retrieved July 17, 2011, from NCES website http://nces.ed.gov.
Ng, P.T. (2013) ‘The global war for talent: responses and challenges in the Singapore higher education system’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(3): 280–292.
Ortiga, Y.Y. (2011) ‘Looking beyond the obvious: power, epistemic culture and student migration in the knowledge-based economy’, Power & Education, 3(3): 263–273.
Ortiga, Y.Y., Chou, M.-H., Sondhi, G. and Wang, J. (2017) ‘Academic “centres,” epistemic differences and brain circulation’, International Migration. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12354.
Paul, A.M. and Long, V. (2016) ‘Human-capital strategies to build world-class research universities in Asia: Impact on global flows, in M-H. Chou, I. Kamola and T. Pietsch (eds.) The Transnational Politics of Higher Education: Contesting the Global/Transforming the Local, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 130–155.
QS World University Ranking. (2016) World University Rankings 2016/2017. http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2015.
Ralph, D. (2009) ‘Home is where the heart is? Understandings of “home” among Irish-Born return migrants from the United States’, Irish Studies Review, 17(2): 183–200.
Robertson, S.L. (2006) ‘Brain drain, brain gain and brain circulation’, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(1): 1–5.
Romanowski, M. and Nasser, R. (2015) ‘Identity issues: expatriate professors teaching and researching in Qatar’, Higher Education, 69: 653–671.
Rostan, M. and Hohle, E.A. (2014) ‘The international mobility of faculty’, in F. Huang, M. Finkelstein and M. Rostan (eds.) The Internationalization of the Academy: Changes, Realities and Prospects, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 79–105.
Rostan, M. and Ceravolo, F.A. (2015) ‘The internationalisation of the academy: convergence and divergence across disciplines’, European Review, 23: S38–S54.
Rostan, M., Huang, F. and Finkelstein, M. (2014) ‘The internationalization of the academy: findings, open questions, and implications’, in F. Huang, M. Finkelstein and M. Rostan (Eds.) The Internationalization of the Academy: Changes, Realities and Prospects, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 258–280.
Saint-Blancat, C. (2017) ‘Making sense of scientific mobility: How Italian scientists look back on their trajectories of mobility in the EU’, Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0042-z.
Sidhu, R., Ho, K.C. and Yeoh, B.S.A. (2011) ‘Emerging education hubs: the case of Singapore’, Higher Education, 61: 23–40.
Sidhu, R., Yeoh, B.S.A. and Chang, S. (2015) ‘A situated analysis of global knowledge networks: capital accumulation strategies of transnationally mobile scientists in Singapore’, Higher Education, 69(1): 79–101.
Stack, M.L. (2013) ‘The times higher education ranking product: visualising excellence through media’, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 11(4):560–582.
Tremblay, K. (2005) ‘Academic mobility and immigration’, Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(3): 196–228.
Yeoh, B.S.A. and Lai, A.E. (2008) ‘Introduction: talent migration in and out of Asia: challenges for policies and places’, Asian Population Studies, 4(3): 235–245.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation, Singapore, under Grant SRIE 023. Any opinions, findings, conclusions and/or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore National Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ortiga, Y.Y., Chou, MH., Sondhi, G. et al. Working Within the Aspiring Center: Professional Status and Mobilities Among Migrant Faculty in Singapore. High Educ Policy 32, 149–166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0078-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0078-0