How the World-Class University Project Affects Scientific Productivity? Evidence from a Survey of Faculty Members in China
- 96 Downloads
Using a survey of faculty members from 30 public universities in China, this study examines the influence of the world-class university (WCU) project on faculty member’s scientific productivity under the perspectives of globalization and national demands. In general, the results support the globalization dimension of the WCU project in China. The WCU project exhibits a positive effect on international publications, but has no significant impact on domestic publications and technology transfer. In addition, it is found that a high level of WCU funding is associated with more patents, while a low level of WCU funding has no influence on patents. The study also explores the indirect effects of the WCU project. It is found that the WCU project has enhanced the effect of non-government research funding on academic publications. Moreover, the WCU institutions put emphasis on attracting talents from abroad, but there is no evidence that researchers from abroad are more productive than domestic researchers in science and engineering fields.
Keywordsworld-class university scientific productivity globalization of higher education research funding
The authors thank Prof. Fenqiao Yan for the data and advice. We are also grateful to Prof. Junwen Zhu and Dr. Yin Li for their comments on earlier drafts of this research.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China [71503167 and 71503013]; Philosophy and Social Science Research Projects of Shanghai [2015EJY001] and Special Research Funding for Humanity and Social Science in Shanghai Jiao Tong University [16JCWH18].
- Altbach, P. (2007) ‘Empires of knowledge and development’. in P. Altbach and J. Balán (eds.) World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
- Demidenko, E. (2013) Mixed Models: Theory and Applications with R, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Inter-Ministry Coordinating Office of “211 Project” (2007) A Report of 211 Project: 1995–2005, Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
- Levin, S.G. and Stephan, P.E. (1991) ‘Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists’, The American Economic Review 81(1): 114–132.Google Scholar
- Mairesse, J. and Turner, L. (2005) Measurement and Explanation of the Intensity of Co-publication in Scientific Research: An Analysis at the Laboratory Level (No. w11172), Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Mali, F., Pustovrh, T., Platinovšek, R., Kronegger, L. and Ferligoj, A. (2016) ‘The effects of funding and co-authorship on research performance in a small scientific community’, Science and Public Policy 44(4): 486–496.Google Scholar
- Ngok, K. (2008) ‘Massification, bureaucratization and questing for “world-class” status: Higher education in China since the mid-1990s’, International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6): 547–564.Google Scholar
- Sandström, U., Wold, A., Jordansson, B., Ohlsson, B. and Smedberg, Å. (2010) Hans Excellens: om miljardsatsningarna på starka forskningsmiljöer [His excellency: On the investments of billions in centers of excellence], Stockholm: Delegationen för jämställdhet i Högskolan.Google Scholar
- van der Wende, M.C. (2009). European resonses to global competitiveness in higher education, Research and Occational Paper Series, No. 7, 2009. Berkeley: Centre for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.Google Scholar
- Wang, Q. and Cheng, Y. (2014) ‘Reflections on the Effects of the 985 Project in Mainland China’, in Y. Cheng, Q. Wang and N. Liu (eds.) How World-Class Universities Affect Global Higher Education, Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar
- Zhou, Y. and Wu, J. (2016). ‘The Game Plan: Four Contradictions in the Development of World Class Universities from the Global South’, Egitim ve Bilim 41(184):75–89.Google Scholar