Unit Support, Past Experience and Researcher Attitude for Intra-institutional Research Collaboration: Survey Study in a US Doctoral/Research University
- 25 Downloads
Intra-institutional collaboration is an often neglected type of research collaboration from the literature. This study aimed to understand what factors contribute to this type of collaboration as well as what types of factors can impact negatively the likelihood of this collaboration. We deployed a survey in a US research institution and measured for factors relating to environmental, past researcher behavior and personal research characteristics. We developed a model that demonstrates how these sets variables influence intra-institutional collaboration and developed recommendations for units. Unit support for collaboration and past behavior were found to impact intra-institutional collaboration. Additionally, researcher’s attitudes toward sharing knowledge and resources were also found to impact the likelihood for collaboration within institution.
Keywordsresearch collaboration academic university support experience
- Birnholtz, J., Guha, S., Yuan, Y.C., Gay, G. and Heller, C. (2013) ‘Cross-campus collaboration: a scientometric and network case study of publication activity across two campuses of a single institution’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1): 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, T.A. (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, New York, The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Bukvova, H. (2010) ‘Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review’, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 10(3). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200629645_Studying_Research_Collaboration_A_Literature_Review.
- Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2011) The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2010 edition, Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Chung, E., Kwon, N. and Lee, J. (2015) ‘Understanding scientific collaboration in the research life cycle: Bio- and nanoscientists’ motivations, information-sharing and communication practices, and barriers to collaboration’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Published online 5 May 2015. doi.org/ 10.1002/asi.23520.
- De Solla Price, D. (1986) Little Science, Big Science…and Beyond, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Finney, S.J. and DiStefano, C. (2006) ‘Non-normal and categorical data in structured equation modeling’, in G.R. Hancock and R.O. Mueller (eds.) Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, Charlotte, NC: IAP, pp. 269–297.Google Scholar
- Fox, M.F. and Faver, C.A. (1984) ‘Independence and cooperation in research: the motivations and costs of collaboration’ The Journal of Higher Education 55(3): 347–359.Google Scholar
- Hagstrom, W.O. (1965) The Scientific Community, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Harris, P.A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N. and Conde, J.G. (2009) ‘Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support’, Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42(2): 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katerndahl, D.A. (1996) ‘Associations between departmental features and departmental scholarly activity’, Family Medicine 28(2): 119–127.Google Scholar
- Katz, J.S. (1993) Bibliometic assessment of intranational university-university collaboration. PhD thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
- Kraut, R., Egido, C. and Galegher, J. (1988) Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration, in Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, 26–28 September 1988, Portland, Oregon. New York: ACM, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- Meadows, A.J. (1974) Communication in Science, London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
- Rosseel, Y. (2012) ‘lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling’, Journal of Statistical Software 48(2), published online 24/05/2012. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. and Katz, J.S. (2000). Collaborative Approaches to Research. HEFCE Fundamental Review of Research Policy and Funding, Final Report. Higher Education Policy Unit (HEPU), University of Leeds and the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) University of Sussex. Available on http://users.sussex.ac.uk/~sylvank/pubs/collc.pdf.
- Wright, J.D. and Marsden, P.V. (2010) ‘Survey research and social science: history, current practice, and future prospects’, in J.D. Wright and P.V. Marsden (eds.) Handbook of Survey Research, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar