Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between disciplinary and organisational cultures and regional engagement. Disciplinary and organisational dimensions are key factors of academic identity and have a crucial impact on the ability of higher education institutions to actively engage within regional actors. The analysis builds on empirical data from selected Czech and Norwegian case higher education institutions. We call into question the conjecture that only specific organisational settings and incentive mechanisms — the formal structural side of higher education institutions — lead to better interactions between HEIs and regions. We conclude by arguing that informal tacit dimensions (that we conceptualise as epistemological orientations and disciplinary values and postures) are also important in understanding the dynamics of university regional engagement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbo, P. and Benneworth, P. (2007) Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review, Paris: OECD Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education.
Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Clark, B.R. (1983) The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Clark, B.R. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Bingley: Emerald.
Dressel, P. and Marcus, D. (1982) On Teaching and Learning in College: Reemphasizing the Roles of Learners and the Disciplines, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dvořáčková, J., Pabian, P., Smith, S., Stöckelová, T., Šima, K. and Virtová, T. (2014) Politika a každodennos tna českých vysokých školách: Etnografické pohledy na vzdělávání a výzkum [Politics and Everyday Life in Czech Universities: Ethnographic Perspectives on Teaching, Learning and Research], Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
File, J. and Goedegebuure, L. (2003) Real-Time Systems: Reflections on Higher Education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia, Brno: Vutium Press, Brno University of Technology.
Laredo, P. (2007) ‘Revisiting the third mission of universities: toward a renewed categorization of university activities?’ Higher Education Policy 20(4): 441–456.
Olsen, J.P. (2007) ‘The institutional dynamics of the European university’, in P. Maassen and J.P. Olsen (eds.) University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 25–54.
Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E. and D’Este, P. (2014) ‘Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents’, Research Policy 43(4): 696–706.
Pabian, P., Šima, K. and Kynčilová, L. (2011) ‘Humboldt goes to the labour market: How academic higher education fuels labour market success in the Czech Republic’, Journal of Education and Work 24(1–2): 95–118.
Pinheiro, R., Benneworth, P. and Jones, G.A. (2015) ‘Beyond the obvious: tensions and volitions surrounding the contributions of universities to regional development and innovation 1’, in L.M. Carmo Farinha, J.J.M. Ferreira, S. Bagchi-Sen and H. Lawton Smith (eds.) Handbook of Research on Global Competitive Advantage Through Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 150–172.
Pinheiro, R., Normann, R. and Johnsen, H.C.G. (2016) ‘External engagement and the academic heartland: the case of a regionally-embedded university’, Science and Public Policy 43(6):787–797.
Prudký, L., Pabian, P. and Šima, K. (2010) České vysoké školství: na cestě od elitního k univerzálnímu vzdělávání 1989–2009 [Czech Higher Education: On the Road from Elite to Universal Education 1989–2009], Praha: Grada.
UiA Strategy (2016) Strategy 2016–2020, Adopted by the UiA Univeristy Bord June 2016. Kristiansand: University of Agder. Available online at: https://www.uia.no/en/about-uia/organization/strategy-2016-2020.
Zomer, A. and Benneworth, P. (2011) ‘The rise of the university’s third mission’, in J. Enders, H. de Boer and D. Westerheijden (eds.) Reform of Higher Education in Europe, Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 81–101.
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports under Project Contract No. MSMT-5397/2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šima, K., Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R. et al. What are the Cultural Preconditions of Universities’ Regional Engagement? Towards a Disciplinary Sensitive Model of the University–Region Interface. High Educ Policy 30, 517–532 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0056-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0056-6