Skip to main content

Time is Money: Disentangling Higher Education Cost-Sharing and Commodification Through Deferred Graduate Retirement

Abstract

Current higher education policy debates in Europe are increasingly focusing on raising the share of private funding. To date, policy proposals have centred on a relatively small number of alternatives, namely full public funding, tuition fees, either up-front or delayed and income-contingent, or a surtax on graduate incomes. Here, I present an alternative that, to my knowledge, has not been suggested previously, but sidesteps some important objections against other forms of private contributions. The basic idea explored here is to increase the statutory retirement age for higher education graduates relative to non-graduates. In principle, the resulting decrease in future public pension liabilities can be converted into increased funds for present spending on higher education. In this first discussion of the above proposal, I consider important caveats, perform an order-of-magnitude estimate of whether the financial implications of Deferred Graduate Retirement (DGR) are comparable to those of tuition fees, and discuss advantages and disadvantages compared to more established policy options. I conclude that, at least in the continental European context, DGR promises a number of economically and politically desirable properties compared to established alternatives, and deserves more serious investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L. and Rumbley, L.E. (2009) Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution, Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2009) Good practice in cost sharing and financing in higher education, Manilla: ADB.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asplund, R., Adbelkarim, O.B. and Skalli, A. (2008) ‘An equity perspective on access to, enrolment in and finance of tertiary education’, Education Economics 16(3): 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barr, N. (2004) ‘Higher education funding’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20(2): 264–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr, N.A. (2001) The welfare state as piggy bank: information, risk, uncertainty, and the role of the state, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bevc, M. and Uršič, S. (2008) ‘Relations between funding, equity, and efficiency of higher education’, Education Economics 16(3): 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biffl, G. and Issac, J. (2002) ‘Should higher education students pay tuition fees?’, European Journal of Education 37(4): 433–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks, R. and Waters, J. (2011) ‘Fees, funding and overseas study: mobile UK students and educational inequalities’, Sociological Research Online 16(2), published online 6 June 2011 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/16/2/1.html.

  9. Browne, J. (2010) Securing a sustainable future for higher education: an independent review of higher education and student finance in England, London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brugiavini, A. and Peracchi, F. (2005) ‘The length of working lives in Europe’, Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2–3): 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bunce, L., Baird, A. and Jones, S.E. (2016) ‘The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance’, Studies in Higher Education, doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Callan, T., Smeeding, T. and Tsakloglou, P. (2008) ‘Short-run distributional effects of public education transfers to tertiary education students in seven European countries’, Education Economics 16(3): 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Callender, C. and Jackson, J. (2005) ‘Does fear of debt deter students from higher education?’, Journal of Social Policy 34(4): 509–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Callender, C. and Jackson, J. (2008) ‘Does the fear of debt constrain choice of university and subject of study?’, Studies in Higher Education 33(4): 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chowdry, H., Dearden, L., Goodman, A. and Wenchao, J. (2012) ‘The distributional impact of the 2012–2013 higher education funding reforms in England’, Fiscal Studies 33(2): 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dabla-Norris, E. and Gradstein, M. (2004) The distributional bias of public education: causes and consequences, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davies, P., Mangan, J. and Hughes, A. (2009) ‘Participation, financial support and the marginal student’, Higher Education 58(2): 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davies, P., Qiu, T. and Davies, N.M. (2014) ‘Cultural and human capital, information and higher education choices’, Journal of Education Policy 29(6): 804–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Debande, O. (2004) ‘A review of instruments for student loans in tertiary education’, European Journal of Education 39(2): 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Der Spiegel. (2011) Merkel boxt Euro-Wirtschaftsregierung durch [Merkel Rams through establishment of European Economic Council], Spiegel Online, 4 February. http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/soziales/eu-gipfel-merkel-boxt-euro-wirtschaftsregierung-durch-a-743611.html.

  21. European Union. (2010) ‘Future adequacy of pensions measured by Theoretical Replacement Rates (Annex 5)’, in EU (eds.) Annexes to the Joint Report on Pensions Progress and key challenges in the delivery of adequate and sustainable pensions in Europe, Brussels: EU, pp. 13–28. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/2010/pdf/ocp71_annexes_en.pdf.

  22. Fraja, G.D. (2002) ‘The design of optimal education policies’, Review of Economic Studies 69(2): 437–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ganjapure, V. (2010) ‘Govt may raise principals’ retirement age to 62’, The Times of India, 26 September.

  24. Gerard, M. and Vandenberghe, V. (2007) ‘Introduction: economics of higher education’, Education Economics 15(4): 383–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Green, T.F. (1980) Predicting the behaviour of the educational system, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guille, M. (2002) ‘Student loans: a solution for Europe?’, European Journal of Education 37(4): 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gwosc, C. and Schwarzenberger, A. (2009) ‘Die Finanzierung der Hochschulbildung in Deutschland’ [The financing of higher education in Germany], Wirtschaftsdienst 89(5): 334–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harper, S., Howse, K. and Baxter, S. (2011) Living longer and prospering? Designing an adequate, sustainable and equitable UK state pension system, Oxford: Oxford Institute of Ageing.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harrison, N. (2011) ‘Have the changes introduced by the 2004 Higher Education Act made higher education admissions in England wider and fairer?’, Journal of Education Policy 26(3): 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hartog, J., van Ophem, H. and Bajdechi, S.M. (2007) ‘Simulating the risk of investment in human capital’, Education Economics 15(3): 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Häyrinen-Alestalo, M. and Peltola, U. (2006) ‘The problem of a market-oriented university’, Higher Education 52(2): 251–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heyneman, S.P. (1995) ‘Economics of education: disappointments and potential’, Prospects 25(4): 557–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hossler, D., Lund, J.P., Ramin, J., Westfall, S. and Irish, S (1997) ‘State funding for higher education: the Sisyphean task’, Journal of Higher Education 68(2): 160–190.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hughes, J. and Mackenzie, M. (2011) ‘US asked to follow ultra-long bond trend’, Financial Times Online Edition, 3 February.

  35. Hutchings, M. (2003) ‘Financial barriers to participation’, in L. Archer, M. Hutchings and A. Ross (eds.) Higher education and social class: issues of exclusion and inclusion, London & New York: Routledge Falmer, pp. 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Johnstone, D. (2004). ‘The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education: comparative perspectives’, Economics of Education Review 23(4): 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnstone, D.B. (2000) Student loans in international perspective: promises and failures,myths and partial truths, Buffalo, NY.: Center for Comparative and Global Studies in Education, Graduate School of Education, State University of New York at Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mangan, J., Hughes, A. Davies, P. and Slack, K. (2010) ‘Fair access, achievement and geography: explaining the association between social class and students’ choice of university’, Studies in Higher Education 35(3): 335–350. doi:10.1080/03075070903131610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McMillan, J. and G. Cheney. (1996) ‘The student as consumer: the implications and limitations of a metaphor’, Communication Education 45(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marcucci, P. (2013) ‘The politics of student funding policies from a comparative perspective’ in D.E. Heller and C. Callender (eds). Student financing of higher education, London: Routledge, pp. 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Marginson, S. (2007) ‘The public/private divide in higher education: a global revision’, Higher Education 53(3): 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Neill, C. (2009) ‘Tuition fees and the demand for university places’, Economics of Education Review 28(5): 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. OECD. (2006) Live longer, work longer, Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. OECD. (2009) Pensions at a glance 2009: retirement-income systems in OECD countries, Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. OECD. (2010) Education at a glance 2010: OECD indicators, Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. OECD. (2011) Pension Database. http://stats.oecd.org/.

  47. Saunders, D.B. (2014) ‘They do not buy it: exploring the extent to which entering first-year students view themselves as customers’, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 25(1): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Scott-Clayton, J. (2013) ‘Information constraints and financial aid policy’, in D.E. Heller and C. Callender (eds). Student financing of higher education, London: Routledge, pp. 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schwartz, S. (2011) The higher purpose. Times Higher Education, 1 January.

  50. Shen, H. and Ziderman, A. (2008) ‘Student loans repayment and recovery: international comparisons’, Higher Education 57(3): 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Teixeira, P. and Koryakina, T. (2013) ‘Funding reforms and revenue diversification—patterns, challenges and rhetoric’, Studies in Higher Education 38(2): 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tilak, J.B.G. (2009) ‘Higher education: a public good or a commodity for trade?’, Prospects 38(4): 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tomlinson, M. (2016) ‘Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1113856.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Usher, T. (2010) The role of finance in the decision-making of higher education applicants and students, BIS Research Paper No. 9, Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.

  55. Vandenberghe, V. and Debande, O. (2007) ‘Deferred and income-contingent tuition fees: An empirical assessment using Belgian, German and UK data’, Education Economics 15(4): 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Vossensteyn, J.J. (1999) ‘Where in Europe would people like to study? The affordability of higher education in nine Western European countries’, Higher Education 37(2): 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wakeling, P. and Jefferies, K. (2013) ‘The effect of tuition fees on student mobility: the UK and Ireland as a natural experiment’, British Educational Research Journal 39(3): 491–513.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Whitty, G., Hayton, A. and Tang, S. (2015) ‘Who you know, what you know and knowing the ropes: a review of evidence about access to higher education institutions in England’, Review of Education 3(1): 27–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Williams, G. (1988) ‘The debate about funding mechanisms’, Oxford Review of Education 14(1): 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Williams, J. (2014) ‘A critical exploration of changing definitions of public good in relation to higher education’, Studies in Higher Education 41(4): 619–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilal Fouad Barakat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barakat, B.F. Time is Money: Disentangling Higher Education Cost-Sharing and Commodification Through Deferred Graduate Retirement. High Educ Policy 31, 289–307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0054-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • higher education
  • fees
  • funding
  • access
  • retirement