Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Capacity Building or Market Demand? Transnational Teaching in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1990s when transnational institutions and programmes (TNIPs) proliferated in China, they have been closely related to the capacity building of the local higher education system. The government encourages local higher educational institutions (HEIs) to import educational resources from overseas partners and to innovatively transplant the partners’ good practices into local programmes. The study reported here uses Shanghai as an example to explore the teaching and learning process of TNIPs in China. TNIPs are found to respond mainly to market demands rather than to the governmental intention of capacity building. When making efforts to fulfil the needs of students, TNIPs sacrifice the construction of their academic ability and therefore are unable to serve as examples for local HEIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  • Bambacas, M., Sanderson, G., Feast, V. and Yang, S. (2008) ‘Understanding transnational MBA students’ instructional communication preferences,’ Journal of International Education in Business 1(1): 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannier, J. (2016) ‘Global trends in transnational education,’ International Journal of Information and Education Technology 6(1): 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, S., MacLeod, F. and Saunders, N. (2011) ‘A guide to UK higher education and partnerships for overseas universities,’ https://zh.scribd.com/document/112575673/A-Guide-to-UK-Higher-Education-and-Partnerships-for-Overseas-Universities.

  • British Council. (2013) ‘The Shape of things to come: the evolution of transnational education: data, definitions, opportunities and impacts analysis,’ https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/the_shape_of_things_to_come_2.pdf.

  • British Council. (2014) ‘Exploring the impacts of transnational education on host countries: a pilot study,’ https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/tne_report_2014.pdf.

  • British Council and DAAD. (2014) ‘Impacts of transnational education on host countries: academic, cultural, economic and skills impacts and implications of programme and provider mobility,’ https://www.daad.de/medien/hochschulen/projekte/studienangebote/2014_e003_tne_study_final_web.pdf.

  • Chapman, A. and Pyvis, D. (2013) ‘Enhancing quality in transnational higher education: experiences of teaching and learning in Australian offshore programs,’ Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. (2014) ‘Quality management for universities’ transnational education in Taiwan: an ISO 9004-based evaluation approach,’ KEDI Journal of Educational Policy 11(1): 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debowski, S. (2003) ‘Lost in internationalised space: the challenge of sustaining academics teaching offshore,’ in Proceedings of the 17th IDP Australian international education conference, Melboume, http://www.academia.edu/23241113/Lost_in_internationalised_space_The_challenge_of_sustaining_academics_teaching_offshore.

  • Department of Education and Training. (2015) ‘2014 Overseas students,’ https://docs.education.gov.au/node/38137.

  • Dessoff, A. (2007) ‘Branching out,’ International Educator 16(2): 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorbar, A. and Bateman, C. (2008) ‘The growth of transnational higher education: the UK perspective,’ in L. Dunn and M. Wallace (eds.) Teaching in transnational higher education, New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. and Wallace, M. (2006) ‘Australian academics teaching in Singapore: striving for cultural empathy,’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41(3): 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, W. (2012) ‘The development of transnational higher education in China: a comparative study of research universities and teaching universities,’ Journal of Studies in International Education 16(1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feast, V. and Bretag, T. (2005) ‘Responding to crises in transnational education: new challenges for higher education,’ Higher Education Research and Development 24(1): 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, R. (2008) ‘Transnational education in China: key challenges, critical issues, and strategies for success,’ The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education (May): 1–30.

  • He, L. (2016) ‘Transnational higher education institutions in China: a comparison of policy orientation and reality,’ Journal of Studies in International Education 20(1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M. and Willis, L. (2017) ‘Towards a common transnational education framework: peculiarities in China matter,’ Higher Education Policy 30: 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Education Association of Australia. (2008) Good practice in offshore delivery: a guide for Australian providers, http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A5895.

  • Kelly, M. and Ha, T. (1998) ‘Borderless education and teaching and learning cultures: the case of Hong Kong,’ Australian Universities’ Review 41(1): 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Zhu, S. and Xie, Y. (2014) ‘Investigation and analysis on students’ satisfaction of Chinese-foreign cooperation in running schools: taking Sino-US ‘2 + 2’ cooperative joint programme in N University as an example,’ Journal of Ningbo Radio and TV University 12(1): 100–103. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • McBurnie, G. and Ziguras, C. (2007) ‘Institutions, not students, get the travel bug’ http://wenr.wes.org/2007/09/wenr-september-2007-practical-information/.

  • Ministry of Education. (2006) ‘Suggestions on problems of current Sino foreign cooperation in education’ http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_174/201006/89021.html. (in Chinese).

  • Ministry of Education. (2013) ‘Notice of issuing the evaluation scheme of Sino foreign cooperation in education’ http://wsb.njxzc.edu.cn/69/5f/c3615a26975/page.htm. (in Chinese).

  • Mok, K. (2008) ‘Singapore’s global education hub ambitions: University governance change and transnational higher education,’ International Journal of Educational Management 22(6): 527–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.H. and Han, X. (2016) ‘The rise of transnational higher education and changing educational governance in China,’ International Journal of Comparative Education and Development 18(1): 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Education Commission. (1993) ‘Notice on overseas institutions and individuals coming to China to collaborately run schools,’ http://www.gdjyw.com/jyfg/22/law_22_1013.htm. 1993-06-30/2016-04-10. (in Chinese).

  • National Tertiary Education Union. (2004) ‘Excess baggage: Australian staff involvement in the delivery of offshore courses,’ Southbank: National Tertiary Education Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, J. (2014) ‘Enhancing student learning and teacher development in transnational education,’ York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2012) ‘Transnational education: a case study of one professional doctorate,’ Higher Education Studies 2(4): 14–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, K.C. and Chan, D.K.K. (2012) ‘Transnational higher education and challenges for university governance in China,’ Higher Education Policy 25(2): 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2010) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education: collaborative provision and flexible and distributed learning (including e-learning)—amplified version, Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, S. (2002) ‘Regulation and quality assurance in transnational education,’ Tertiary Education and Management 8(2): 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seah, W. and Edwards, J. (2006) ‘Flying in, flying out: Offshore teaching in higher education,’ Australian Journal of Education 50(3): 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (2015) ‘Shanghai initiates comprehensive education reforms’ http://www.shmec.gov.cn/html/article/201503/79993.php. (in Chinese).

  • Sid Nair, C., Murdoch, N. and Mertova, P. (2011) ‘Benchmarking the student experience: the offshore campus experience,’ TQM Journal 23(6): 585–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Council. (2003) ‘Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Sino foreign cooperation in education’ http://www.gov.cn/test/2005-06/29/content_10930.htm. (in Chinese).

  • Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2009) ‘Cross-border higher education: trends and perspectives,’ in OECD (ed.) Higher education to 2030: Globalisation (vol. 2), Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, pp. 63–88.

  • Vincent-Lancrin, S., Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank and Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2007) Cross-border tertiary education: a way towards capacity development. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. and Dunn, L. (2008) ‘Experiences of transnational learning: Perspectives from some undergraduates in the People’s Republic of China and Singapore,’ in L. Dunn, and M. Wallace (eds.) Teaching in transnational higher education, New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. and Moore, L. (2007) ‘Exploring learning style preferences of Chinese postgraduate students in Australian transnational programs,’ International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning 3(2): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S. and Huisman, J. (2012) ‘The international branch campus as transnational strategy in higher education,’ Higher Education 64(5): 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, L. and Tang, A. (2012) ‘Sino-UK transnational education in China: rhetoric versus reality,’ Journal of Technology Management in China 7(2): 218–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study is sponsored by ‘The humanities and social sciences foundation of the Chinese Ministry of Education’ (14YJA880014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for International and Comparative Education, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Shanghai, 200234, China

    Xiaojiong Ding

Authors
  1. Xiaojiong Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaojiong Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, X. Capacity Building or Market Demand? Transnational Teaching in China. High Educ Policy 31, 267–287 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0053-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0053-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation