Advertisement

Higher Education Policy

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

The Exploitation of Academic Work: Women in Teaching at Swedish Universities

  • Petra Angervall
  • Dennis Beach
Original Article

Abstract

This study concerns some of the implications of the increasing commodification of the higher education sector. It tries to highlight how higher education institutions have developed in the late 2000s through the reform path that was introduced to transform programmes and employees into marketable products. New forms of governance that change institutional contexts and concrete practices accompany this change. Based on interviews with a group of female academic lecturers and teachers, we look in particular at how the work structure is organized and practised at Swedish universities. The results illustrate a greater division of labour and a fragmentation of academic work that can be explained by recent developments. More specifically, it appears as if female academics in teaching-intensive departments do work that serves the interests of others (often men), foremost in areas and practices such as research.

Keywords

academic work governance division of labour gender teaching 

References

  1. Acker, S. (2014) ‘A foot in the revolving door? Women academics in lower middle management’, Higher Education Research and Development 33(1): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acker, S. and Armenti, C. (2004) ‘Sleepless in Academia’, Gender and Education 16(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acker, S. and Dillabough, J.-A. (2007) ‘Women ‘learning to labour’ in the ‘male emporium’: exploring gendered work in teacher education’, Gender and Education 19(3): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angervall, P. (2016). ‘The academic career: a study of subjectivity, gender and movement among women university lecturers’, Gender and Education Published online 11 May 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1184234.
  5. Angervall, P. and Gustafsson, J. (2015) ‘Invited to Academia. Recruited for Science or Teaching in Education Sciences’ Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research published online 6 Aug 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066432.
  6. Angervall, P., Beach, D. and Gustafsson, J. (2015) ‘The unacknowledged value of female academic labour power for male research careers’ Higher Education Research and Development 34(5): 815–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer, L. (2008) ‘Younger academics’ constructions of authenticity, success and professional identity’, Studies in Higher Education 33(4): 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aronowitz, S. (2000) The Knowledge Factory. Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, S. J. (2012) ‘Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: an I-Spy guide to the neoliberal university’, British Journal of Educational Studies 60(1): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ball, S. J. (2013) The Education Debate (2nd ed), Bristol: Policy.Google Scholar
  11. Beach, D. (2011) ‘Education science in Sweden: promoting research for teacher education or weakening its scientific foundations?’ Education Inquiry 2(2): 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beach, D. (2013) ‘Changing Higher Education: converging policy-packages and experiences of changing academic work in Sweden’, Journal of Educational Policy 28(4): 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beach, D. and Puaca, G. (2014) ‘Changing higher education by converging policy-packages: education choices and student identities’, European Journal of Higher Education 4(1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Becher, T., and Trowler, P. R. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines (2nd ed), Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bendix Petersen, E. (2009) ‘Resistance and enrolment in the enterprise university: an ethno-drama in three acts, with appended reading’, Journal of Education Policy 24(4): 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Billot, J. (2010) ‘The imagined and the real: identifying the tensions for academic identity’, Higher Education Research and Development 29(6): 709–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blackmore, J. (2009) ‘Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: evaluating teaching and what students want’, Studies in Higher Education 34(8): 857–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calhoun, C. (2006) ‘Is the University in crisis?’ Society 43(4): 8–18.Google Scholar
  19. Carvalho, T., and Santiago, R. (2008) ‘Academics in a new work environment: the impact on new public management on work conditions’, Higher Education Quarterly 62(3): 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carvalho, T., and Santiago, R. (2010) ‘New challenges for women seeking an academic career: the hiring process in Portuguese higher education institutions’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 32(3): 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drennan, L. (2001) ‘Quality Assessment and the Tension between Teaching and Research’, Quality in Higher Education 7(3): 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dubravka, Z. (2015) ‘On intellectual labour and neoliberalism in academia—or, in praise of reviewers’, European Journal of Women’s Studies 22(3): 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Enders, J., and de Boer, H. (2009) ‘The mission impossible of the European University: Institutional confusion and institutional diversity’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, and P. Maassen (eds.) European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar
  24. EU Minsters. (2003) ‘Realizing the European Higher Education Area’, Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin on 19 September 2003, accessed 12 November 2014. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Declarations/Berlin_Communique1.pdf.
  25. Furlong, J. (2013) ‘Globalisation, neo-liberalism and the reform of teacher education in England’, The Educational Forum 77(1): 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gale, H. (2011). ‘The reluctant academic: early career academics in a teaching orientated University’, International Journal of Academic Development 16(3): 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giroux, H. (2005) The Terror of Neoliberalism: Cultural Politics and the Promise of Democracy, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Grant, M., B. and Elizabeth, V. (2015) ‘Unpredictable feelings: academic women under research audit’, British Educational Research Journal 41(2): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hattie, J., and H. W. Marsh. (1996) ‘the relationship between research and teaching: a meta-analysis’, Review of Educational Research 66(4): 507–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henkel, M. (2000) Academic identities and policy change in higher education, London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  31. Leathwood, C. and Read, B. (2009) Gender and the changing face of higher education: a feminised future? Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Locke, W., Whitchurch, C., Smith, H., and Mazenod, A. (2016) Shifting Landscapes: meeting the staff development needs of the changing academic workforce, York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  33. Morley, L. (2014) ‘Lost leaders: women in the global academy’, Higher Education Research and Development 33(1): 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morley, L. (2015) ‘Troubling intra-actions: gender, neo-liberalism and research in the global academy’, Journal of Education Policy 23(3): 1–18.Google Scholar
  35. Morse, M. J. (2007) ‘Sampling in grounded theory’, in A. Bryant and K. Charmaz (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, London: Sage Publications, pp. 229–224.Google Scholar
  36. Mósesdóttir, L. (2011) ‘Gender (in)equalities in the knowledge society’. Gender, Work and Organization 18(1): 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nilsson-Lindström, M., and Beach, D. (2015) ‘Changes in teacher education in Sweden in the neo-liberal age: toward an occupation in itself or a profession for itself?’ Education Inquiry 6(3): 241–258.Google Scholar
  38. Öhrn, E., and Lundahl, L. (2013)’Kön och karriär i akademin En studie inom det utbildningsvetenskapliga fältet’ (red.), Göteborgs universitet, Göteborg, http://hdl.handle.net/2077/32940.
  39. Robinson, W. and Hilli, A. (2016) ‘The english teaching excellence framework and professionalizing teaching and learning in research-intensive Universities: an exploration of opportunities, challenges, rewards and values from a recent empirical study’, Foro de Educación 14(21): 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, S. (2012) ‘Academic zombies. A failure of resistance or a means of survival?’, Australian Universities Review 54(2): 3–11.Google Scholar
  41. Slaughter, S., and Leslie, L. (2001) ‘Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism’, Organization 8(2): 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strike, T. (2010) ‘Evolving academic career pathways in England’, in G. Gordon, and C. Whitchurch (eds.) Academic and Professional Identities in Higher Education, The Challenges of a Diversifying Workforces, New York: Routledge, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
  43. Swedish Commission Report (2004:115).’Den könade förskolan—om betydelsen av jämställdhet och genus i förskolans pedagogiska arbete’ [Gender in Pre-School: Gender equality in pre-school practises]. Delbetänkande av Delegationen för jämställdhet i förskolan (SOU). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  44. Swedish Commission Report (2008:104). ‘Självständiga lärosäten -Betänkande av Autonomiutredningen’ [The independent University: The Autonomy Report]. (SOU). Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  45. Swedish Government Bill (2006/07:43).’Frihet att välja - ett ökat inflytande för universitet och högskolor’ [Freedom to choose – extended influence for universities and university colleges]. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.Google Scholar
  46. Swedish Government Bill (2008/09:50). ‘Ett lyft för Forskning och innovation’ [A lift for research and innovation]. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.Google Scholar
  47. Swedish Government Bill (2009/10:149). ‘En akademi i tiden—ökad frihet för universitet och högskolor’ [An academy of this day and age: extended freedoms for universities and university colleges]. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.Google Scholar
  48. Swedish Government Bill (2012/13: 30).’Forskning och innovation’ [Research and innovation]. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.Google Scholar
  49. Swedish Research Council (2015a). ‘Forskningens framtid’ [The Future of Research]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet (VR).Google Scholar
  50. Swedish Research Council (2015b). ‘Forskningskvalitet för framtiden. Redovisning av regeringsuppdrag’, (VR: U2015/1362/F). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie.Google Scholar
  51. The Swedish Council of Higher Education (2014). ‘Gender Equality in Higher Education—once and for all?’. Stockholm: UHR.Google Scholar
  52. Trowler, P., Saunders, M., and Bamber, V. (2012) ‘Tribes and territories in the 21st century: rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education’, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. van den Brink, M. (2010) Behind the Scenes of Science. Gender Practices in the Recruitment and Selection of Professors in the Netherlands, Amsterdam University Press: Pallas Pbt.Google Scholar
  54. Walby, S. (2011) ‘Is the knowledge society gendered?’ Gender, Work and Organization 18(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watts, R. (2014) ‘Females in science: a contradictory concept?’ Educational Research 56(2): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitchurch, C. (2012) ‘Re-constructing Identities in Higher Education: The Rise of ‘Third Space’ Professionals’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education and Special EducationUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations