Higher Education Policy

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 53–68 | Cite as

Higher Education Policy on Student Engagement: Thinking Outside the Box

Original Article

Abstract

It has been suggested that higher education policy across the world is currently framed by a common set of assumptions. As a result, policy makers have a restricted sense of the options that are open to them. This paper looks to the paradigm of critical realism in order to open up alternative perspectives for policy makers. The argument specifically focuses on policy around student engagement, building on earlier theorising in this area. Student engagement is seen to be constituted by the agency of learners within educational settings, supported as this is by the social relations maintained by learners. The argument opens up alternative framings for policy in ways that take account of the reflexivity and relational goods that sustain the engagement of students in their studies, addressing areas such as teaching and learning, extra-curricular activity, human resources, the character of institutions and student protest.

Keywords

student engagement critical realism social relations reflexivity teaching excellence 

References

  1. Archer, L. (2007) ‘Diversity, equality and higher education: a critical reflection on the ab/uses of equity discourse within widening participation’, Teaching in Higher Education 12(5–6): 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M.S. (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M.S. (2007) Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M.S. (2012) The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashwin, P., and McVitty, D. (2015) ‘The meanings of student engagement: Implications for policies and practices’, in A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, and P. Scott (eds.) The European Higher Education Area, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astin, A.W. (1993) ‘Diversity and multiculturalism on the campus: How are students affected?’ Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 25(2): 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badge, J.L., Saunders, N.F.W. and Cann, A.J. (2012) ‘Beyond marks: new tools to visualise student engagement via social networks’, Research in Learning Technology 20(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, R. (1990) The Idea of Higher Education, Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barnett, R. (2016) ‘Policy, what policy?’, in P. John and J. Fanghanel (eds.) Dimensions of Marketisation in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 223–232.Google Scholar
  10. Baron, P. and Corbin, L. (2012) ‘Student engagement: rhetoric and reality’, Higher Education Research & Development 31(6): 759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhaskar, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of Contemporary Human Science, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bhaskar, R. (1993) Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Sampson, J. (2014) Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Bringle, R.G. and Hatcher, J.A. (1996) ‘Implementing service learning in higher education’, The Journal of Higher Education 67(2): 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clegg, S. (2005) ‘Evidence-based practice in educational research: A critical realist critique of systematic review’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 26(3): 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conrad, D. (2005) ‘Building and maintaining community in cohort-based online learning’, Journal of Distance Education 20(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
  17. Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2016) Success as a Knowledge Economy: teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice, London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
  18. Dépelteau, F. (2008) ‘Relational thinking: a critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency’, Sociological Theory 26(1): 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donati, P. (2011) Relational sociology: a new paradigm for the social sciences, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Donati, P. and Archer, M.S. (2015) The Relational Subject, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edgley, A., Stickley, T., Timmons, S. and Meal, A. (2014) ‘Critical realist review: exploring the real, beyond the empirical’, Journal of Further and Higher Education Published online 29 September. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2014.953458.
  22. Fenwick, T., Nerland, M. and Jensen, K. (2012) ‘Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualising professional learning and practice’, Journal of Education and Work 25(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geschwind, L. (2010) ‘Getting pole position: research strategies in the humanities at Swedish universities’, Tertiary Education and Management 16(2): 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Golde, C.M. and Pribbenow, D.A. (2000) ‘Understanding faculty involvement in residential learning communities’, Journal of College Student Development 41(1): 27–40.Google Scholar
  25. Gourlay, L. (2015) ‘“Student engagement” and the tyranny of participation’, Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4): 402–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grant, A. (2006) Personal Tutoring: A System in Crisis, Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  27. Gray, M., Plath, D., Webb, P.S.A. and Webb, S. (2009) Evidence-based Social Work: A Critical Stance, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Greenhalgh, J. (2014) ‘Realist synthesis’, in P.K. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, and S. Vincent (eds.) Studying organisations using critical realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 264–281.Google Scholar
  29. Harper, S.R. and Quaye, S.J. (2009) Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Healey, M. and Jenkins, A. (2009) Developing undergraduate research and inquiry, York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  31. Kahn, P.E. (2014) ‘Theorising student engagement in higher education’, British Educational Research Journal 40(6): 1005–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahn, P.E. (2015) ‘Critical perspectives on methodology in pedagogic research’, Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4): 442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuh, G.D. (2009) ‘The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations’, New Directions for Institutional Research (141): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laves, E. (2010) The impact of teaching presence in intensive online courses on perceived learning and sense of community: A mixed methods study, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/76/, accessed 1 December 2016.
  35. Locke, W. (2009) ‘Reconnecting the research–policy–practice nexus in higher education: “Evidence-Based Policy” in practice in national and international contexts’, Higher Education Policy 22(2): 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macfarlane, B. (2015) ‘Student performativity in higher education: converting learning as a private space into a public performance’, Higher Education Research and Development 34(2): 338–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magin, D. (2001) ‘Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work’, Studies in Higher Education 26(1): 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin, A. and Roodt, G. (2008) ‘Perceptions of organisational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intentions in a post-merger South African tertiary institution’, South African Journal of Industrial Psychology 34(1): 23–31.Google Scholar
  39. Newman, J.H. (2008). The Idea of a University, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pawson, R. (2002) ‘Evidence-based policy: the promise of `Realist Synthesis’’, Evaluation 8(3): 340–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Perkins, D. (1999) ‘The many faces of constructivism’, Educational Leadership 57(3): 6–11.Google Scholar
  43. Putnam, R.D. (1995) ‘Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital’, Journal of Democracy 6(1): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ridder-Symoens, H. de. (2003) A History of the University in Europe: Volume 1, Universities in the Middle Ages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rogers, C.R. (1969) Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become, Columbus: Merrill Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Saarinen, T. and Ursin, J. (2012) ‘Dominant and emerging approaches in the study of higher education policy change’, Studies in Higher Education 37(2): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sawir, E., Marginson, S., Deumert, A., Nyland, C. and Ramia, G. (2008) ‘Loneliness and international students: an Australian study’, Journal of Studies in International Education 12(2): 148–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scott, J. (2012) Social network analysis, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Shulman, L.S. (2005) ‘Signature pedagogies in the professions’, Daedalus 134(3): 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Siemens, G. and Long, P. (2011) ‘Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education’, EDUCAUSE Review 46(5): 30.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, C. (2010) What is a person?, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tettey, W.J. (2006) Staff Retention in African Universities, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, L. and Hixenbaugh, P. (2006) Personal tutoring in higher education, Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  55. Tomlinson, M. (2016) ‘The impact of market-driven higher education on student-university relations: investing, consuming and competing’, Higher Education Policy 29(2): 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trowler, V. (2010) Student Engagement Literature Review, York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  57. Trow, M. (2006) ‘Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII’, in J. Forest and P. Altbach (eds.) International Handbook of Higher Education, Vol. 18, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 243–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walsh, L. and Kahn, P.E. (2009) Collaborative Working in Higher Education, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000) ‘Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy’, The World Bank Research Observer 15(2): 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Development DivisionUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations