Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using cognitive and causal modelling to develop a theoretical framework for implementing innovative practices in primary healthcare management in New Zealand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Systems

Abstract

The continuing rise in chronic health conditions requires major changes in how healthcare is managed and delivered. While research has identified a number of factors key to bringing this about, implementing these changes requires an understanding of how the factors interact over time in different contexts. In this research study, seven senior health experts in New Zealand were interviewed, using cognitive mapping, to ascertain their thinking about major implementation challenges to enhance primary healthcare systems. The resulting cognitive maps were then consolidated and developed into a causal loop diagram, which describes a set of interlinked feedback loops representing the processes involved in implementing changes. It is concluded that these systems methods are very effective in better understanding the contextual and behavioural factors necessary for the development of a theoretical framework to support the successful implementation of innovative primary healthcare programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, F. 2012. Problem structuring methods ‘in the Dock’: Arguing the case for Soft OR. European Journal of Operational Research 219: 652–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, D.F., J.M. Bryson, G.P. Richardson, F. Ackermann, C. Eden, and C.B. Finn. 2007. Education and practice: The thinking persons’ institute approach. Journal of Public Affairs Education 12 (3): 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. 1996. Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 32 (4): 390–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., and D. Cervone. 1983. Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (5): 1017–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. 1994. Brain of the firm, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L.V. 1969. General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, E.H., T.R. Webster, D. Baker, M. Schlesinger, S.K. Inouye, M.C. Barth, K.L. Lapanne, D. Lipson, R. Stone, and M.J. Koren. 2004. Translating research into practice: Speeding the adoption of innovative care programs. The Commonwealth Fund (July 2004, Issue Brief). www.cmwf.org.

  • Carlfjord, S., M. Lindberg, P. Bendtsen, P. Nilsen, and A. Andersson. 2010. Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: A qualitative study based on implementation theory. BMC Family Practice 11 (1): 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavana, R.Y., B.L. Delahaye, and U. Sekaran. 2001. Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Brisbane: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavana, R.Y., and E.D. Mares. 2004. Integrating critical thinking and systems thinking: From premises to causal loops. System Dynamics Review 20 (3): 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. 1993. Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M., Boyd, M.-A., Kenealy, T., Moffitt, A., Sheridan, N., and J. Kolbe. 2010. Alleviating the burden of chronic conditions in New Zealand: The ABCC NZ study workbook 2010, p. 50. University of Auckland.

  • Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damschroder, L.J., D.C. Aron, R.E. Keith, S.R. Kirsh, J.A. Alexander, and J.C. Lowery. 2009. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 4 (1): 50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. 1988. Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research 36: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. 1994. Cognitive mapping and problem structuring for system dynamics model building. System Dynamics Review 10 (2–3): 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., F. Ackermann, J.M. Bryson, G.P. Richardson, D.F. Andersen, and C.B. Finn. 2009. Integrating modes of policy analysis and strategic management practice: Requisite elements and dilemmas. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60: 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., F. Ackermann, and S. Cropper. 1992. The analysis of cause maps. Journal of Management Studies 29 (3): 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Sawah S., A. Mclucas, and J. Mnazanov. 2009. Communication about water management in the Australian capital Territory: A system dynamics modelling approach. International System Dynamics Conference.

  • Erez, M., and I. Zidon. 1984. Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (1): 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. 1961. Industrial dynamics. Oregon: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. 1994. Policies, decisions, and information sources for modeling. Modeling for Learning Organisations (pp. 51–84). Productivity Press, Portland OR.

  • Franco, L.A. 2007. Assessing the impact of problem structuring methods in multi-organizational settings: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58: 760–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C. 2003. Improving the performance of health services: The role of clinical leadership. Lancet 361: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R.P., J. Luoma, and E. Saarinen. 2013. On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems. European Journal of Operational Research 228 (3): 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockenberry, M., M. Walden, and T. Brown. 2007. Creating an evidence-based practice environment. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 22 (3): 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. 1995. Hidden order: How adaption builds complexity. Canada: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer J. and B. Milstein. 2004. Optimal decision making in a dynamic model of community health. Hawaii International Conference on System Science 1–11.

  • Homer, J., B. Milstein, K. Wile, P. Pratibhu, R. Farris, and D. Orenstein. 2008. Modeling the local dynamics of cardiovascular health: Risk factors, context and capacity. Preventing Chronic Disease 5: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, J., B. Milstein, G.B. Hirsch, and E.S. Fisher. 2016. Combined regional investments could substantially enhance health system performance and be financially affordable. Health Aff (Millwood) 35: 1435–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howick, S., C. Eden, F. Ackermann, and T. Williams. 2008. Building confidence in models for multiple audiences: The modelling cascade. European Journal of Operational Research 186: 1068–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howick, S., and C. Eden. 2011. Supporting strategic conversations: The significance of a quantitative model building process. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62: 868–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joosten, E.A., L. Defuentes-Merillas, G.H. de Weert, T. Sensky, C.P. van der Staak, and C.A. de Jong. 2008. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychotherapy Psychosomatics 77(4): 219–226. doi:10.1159/000126073

  • Jordan, J.E., A.M. Briggs, C.A. Brand, and R.H. Osborne. 2008. Enhancing patient engagement in chronic disease self-management support initiatives in Australia: The need for an integrated approach. Medical Journal of Australia 189 (10): S9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R.L., R. Priester, and A.M. Totten. 2005. Meeting the challenge of chronic illness. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., and D.F. Andersen. 2012. Building confidence in causal maps generated from purposive text data; mapping transcripts of the Federal Reserve. System Dynamics Review 28 (4): 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopainsky, B., and L.F. Luna-Reyes. 2008. Closing the loop: Promoting synergies with other theory building approaches to improve system dynamics practice. Systems Research and Behavioural Science 25: 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D.C. 2008. The Emergence and use of diagramming in system dynamics: a critical account. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 25: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.W., and Y.K. Ko. 2009. Effects of self-efficacy, affectivity and collective efficacy on nursing performance of hospital nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66 (4): 839–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin G., E. Roberts, B, G. Hirsch, B, D. Kligler, S, J. Wilder, F and Roberts, Nancy. (1976). The dynamics of human service delivery. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company

  • Lewin, K. 1997. Resolving social conflicts & field theory in social science. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A., G.P. Latham, and M. Erez. 1988. The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review 13 (1): 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Reyes, L.F., and D.L. Andersen. 2003. Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models. System Dynamics Review 19 (4): 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maani, K.E., and R.Y. Cavana. 2007. Systems thinking, system dynamics: Managing change and complexity, 2nd ed. Auckland: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., R.Y. Cavana, J. Brocklesby, J.L. Foote, D.R.R. Wood, and A. Ahuriri-Driscoll. 2013. Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods. European Journal of Operational Research 229: 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and J. Brocklesby. 1997. Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, The International Journal of Management Science 25: 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and L. White. 2010. A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science. European Journal of Operational Research 207: 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, N.P. 2002. A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organization Science 13 (2): 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G.P. 1997. Problems in causal loop diagrams revisited. System Dynamics Review 13: 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G.P. 1991. Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J., and J. Mingers. 2004. Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research 152: 530–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruston, A., and A. Tavabie. 2010. Fostering clinical engagement and medical leadership and aligning cultural values: An evaluation of a general practice specialty trainee integrated training placement in a primary care trust. Quality in Primary Care 18 (4): 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, A.M. 1997. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 237–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffernicht, M. 2010. Causal loop diagrams between structure and behaviour: a critical analysis of the relationship between polarity, behaviour and events. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 27: 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M., and S. Grösser. 2008. System dynamics as model-based theory making. Systems Research and Behavioural Science 25: 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. 1990. The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J.D. 1989. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science 35 (3): 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J.D. 2000. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, M., & Cohen, D. 1999. A systemic and value-based approach to strategic reform of the mental health system. Health Care Analysis 7: 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E.H., B. Austin, C. Davis, M. Hindmarsh, J. Schaefer, and A. Bonomi. 2001. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Affairs 20 (6): 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (ed.). 1984. The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know (contributions to constructivism). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Synergia Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand

    David Rees

  2. Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Robert Y. Cavana

  3. Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Jacqueline Cumming

Authors
  1. David Rees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Y. Cavana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacqueline Cumming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Rees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rees, D., Cavana, R.Y. & Cumming, J. Using cognitive and causal modelling to develop a theoretical framework for implementing innovative practices in primary healthcare management in New Zealand. Health Syst (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41306-017-0029-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41306-017-0029-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation