Advertisement

Feminist Review

, Volume 120, Issue 1, pp 130–134 | Cite as

‘invisibilise’ this: ocular bias and ableist metaphors in anti-oppressive discourse

  • Michael Wilson BecerrilEmail author
Open Space

It’s difficult to escape the visual bias of the English language. (Although to be fair, this criticism applies also to my first language, Spanish, so perhaps the unconscious preference is present in many languages and across Western discourses more broadly.) It is not so surprising that people are inclined to use metaphors such as ‘observations’, ‘viewpoints’ or ‘seeing’ as if they represent feelings and perception as a whole. What is surprising is how prevalent these practices are within platforms that label themselves feminist and anti-oppressive.

Whether in a recent episode of Full Frontal with Samantha Bee,1in memes or videos by ‘woke’ Instagram users, in journalism or in peer-reviewed journal articles and books, the language of visibility is a popular stand-in for attention, noticing and erasure. For example, you may have come across otherwise excellent discussions of how women of colour’s labour or political agency has been systematically ‘invisibilised’ in dominant social...

Notes

acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Professor Sylvanna Falcón for encouraging this publication, and the students in her seminar ‘Bridging Latin American and Latina/o Studies’ in the fall of 2017 for listening and providing their feedback to these ideas.

references

  1. Bacha, J., 2016. How women wage conflict without violence. TEDSummit, 29 August. Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/julia_bacha_how_women_wage_conflict_without_violence/transcript [last accessed 26 June 2018].
  2. Butler, J., 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Imarisha, W., 2015. Rewriting the future. Bitch Magazine, 11 February. Available at: https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/rewriting-the-future-prison-abolition-science-fiction [last accessed 26 June 2018].
  4. Manica, D.T. and Rios, C., 2017. (In)visible blood: menstrual performances and body art. Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, 14(1). Available at: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/vb/v14n1/1809-4341-vb-14-01-e141124.pdf [last accessed 26 June 2018].
  5. Mignolo, W., 2007. Epistemic disobedience, the de-colonial option, and the meaning of identity in politics. Gragoatá, 22(1), pp. 11–41.Google Scholar
  6. Miranda, B., 2016. 4 Indigenous women activists on the fight to protect their lands and cultures. Remezcla, 31 October. Available at: http://remezcla.com/lists/culture/4-indigenous-ecuadorian-women-talk-land-struggles/ [last accessed 26 June 2018].
  7. Pachirat, T., 2013. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Padilla, Y., 2016. What does ‘Latinx’ mean? A look at the term that is challenging gender norms. COMPLEX, 18 April. Available at: https://www.complex.com/life/2016/04/latinx/ [last accessed 26 June 2018].
  9. Perry, K-K.Y., 2013. Black Women Against the Land Grab. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Rosati, S., 2017. La España afro es invisible. El País, 10 November. Available at: https://elpais.com/elpais/2017/11/06/planeta_futuro/1509973183_806384.html [last accessed 26 June 2018] [in Spanish].
  11. Roshanravan, S., 2014. Motivating coalition: women of color and epistemic disobedience. Hypatia, 29(1), pp. 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsing, A.L., 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Feminist Review Collective 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colgate UniversityHamiltonUSA

Personalised recommendations