Feminist Review

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 114–129 | Cite as

archive fanfiction: experimental archive research methodologies and feminist epistemological tactics



This essay proposes that subcultural practices such as gossip and fan writing are feminist epistemologies that can form radical archive inquiry and knowledge production, and creative outputs. Drawing on feminist new materialism and archive theory, I develop a set of principles for practice-based research methodologies that incorporate a researcher’s intersubjective relationship with archive matter (e.g. records, documents, classification systems, social-material contexts) and consider the production of knowledge from such research as forms of fabulation. Fabulation here is seen as part of a critically transgressive epistemological stance that expands feminist critiques of universalising master narratives and archive orthodoxies. My proposition, formed in part through a residency in the Woman’s Art Library in London, is to name such research gestures ‘archive fanfiction’, where experimental and practice-oriented method moves with feminist politics and activism.


archive research epistemology fan fiction gossip practice-based fabulation 


  1. Ahmed, S., 2014. Willful Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A., 2003, Archive and aspiration. In J. Brouwer, ed. Information is Alive. Rotterdam: V2, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon-Smith, C., 1999. Science Fiction Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, K., 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barr, M.S., 2008. Feminist fabulation. In D. Seed, ed. A Companion to Science Fiction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 142–155.Google Scholar
  6. Boyce, S., 1999–ongoing. Devotional. Series of performances, artworks, archive and ephemera.Google Scholar
  7. Boyce, S., 2008–ongoing. Devotional Wallpaper. Printed wallpaper.Google Scholar
  8. Boyce, S., 2013–ongoing. The Devotional Collection. CDs, cassettes, vinyl records and other ephemera relating to black British women in the music industry.Google Scholar
  9. Butt, G., 2005. Between You and Me: Queer Disclosures in the New York Art World, 19481963. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carson, A., 2001. Men in the Off Hours. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Cixous, H., 2007. Manhattan: Letters from Prehistory. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chander, A. and Sunder, M., 2007. Everyone’s a superhero: a cultural theory of Mary Sue fan fiction as fair use. California Law Review, 95(2), pp. 597–626.Google Scholar
  13. Cvetkovich, A., 2003. An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J., 1998. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eichhorn, K., 2013. The Archival Turn in Feminism: Outrage in Order. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fineman, J., 2005. The history of the anecdote: fiction and fiction. In J. Fineman, ed. The Subjectivity Effect in Western Literary Tradition: Essays Toward the Release of Shakespeare’s Will. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 59–87.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M., 1977. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D.F. Bouchard, ed. Language, Counter Memory, Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 139–164.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M., 1980. Two lectures. In C. Gordon, ed. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Vintage, pp. 78–108.Google Scholar
  19. Gallop, J., 2002. Anecdotal Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gopinath, G., 2010. Archive, affect and the everyday: queer diasporic re-visions. In J. Staiger, A. Cvetkovich and A. Reynolds, eds. Political Emotions. London: Routledge, pp. 165–192.Google Scholar
  21. Gordon, J.B., 2015. Gossip and Subversion in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  22. Grant, C., 2011. Fans of feminism: re-writing histories of second-wave feminism in contemporary art. Oxford Art Journal, 34(2), pp. 265–286.Google Scholar
  23. Greenan, A., 2007. How images are the making of the Women’s Art Library/Make. Art Libraries Journal, 32(1), pp. 4–9.Google Scholar
  24. Guerrilla Girls, 1988. The Advantages of Being a Woman Artist. Poster. Held at London: Tate Modern.Google Scholar
  25. Haraway, D., 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp. 575–599.Google Scholar
  26. Harding, S., 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harding, S., ed., 1987. Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harding, S., 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ingleton, H., 2015. Sounding out archival interventions. Presentation made at Gender and the Archive: Conversation Across Disciplines and Practices, 30 January. University of Roehampton, London. Available at: [last accessed 15 May 2015].
  30. Iniva, 2013. Scat: sound and collaboration. Press release. Iniva, 18 April. Available at: [last accessed 13 April 2015].
  31. Jenkins, H., 2013. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Loveless, N.S., 2011. Reading with knots: on Jane Gallop’s anecdotal theory. S: Journal of the Jan van Eyck Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique, 4, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
  33. Lykke, N., 2010. Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Motamedi Fraser, M., 2012. Once upon a problem. The Sociological Review, 60(S1), pp. 84–107.Google Scholar
  35. Pester, H., 2015. Go to Reception and Ask for Sara in Red Felt Tip. London: Book Works.Google Scholar
  36. Power, N., 2010. Waiting for the future., 1 March. Available at: [last accessed 20 April 2017].
  37. Ridykeulous, 2006. The Advantages of Being a Lesbian Woman Artist. LTTR, 5, p. 53.Google Scholar
  38. Rogoff, I., 1995. Gossip as testimony: a postmodern signature. MAKE Magazine, 67, pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
  39. Rogoff, I., 2002. Gossip as testimony: a postmodern signature. In A. Jones, ed. The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 58–65.Google Scholar
  40. Scholes, R., 1976. The roots of science fiction. In M. Rose, ed. Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, pp. 46–56.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, L.T., 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  42. Spacks, P., 1985. Gossip. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  43. Steedman, C., 2001. Dust. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tamboukou, M., 2013. Archival research: unravelling space/time/matter entanglements and fragments. Qualitative Research, 14(5), pp. 617–633.Google Scholar
  45. The Otolith Group, 2003. Otolith I. Video. Available at: [last accessed 20 April 2017].Google Scholar
  46. The Otolith Group, cur., 2007. The Ghost of Songs: The Film Art of the Black Audio Film Collective, 1982–1998. Exhibition held at Liverpool: FACT, 2 February–1 April.Google Scholar
  47. Throp, M. and Walsh, M., 2015. Twenty Years of MAKE Magazine: Back to the Future of Women’s Art. London: I.B. Tauris, Limited.Google Scholar
  48. Wakeford, N., 2014. 484 14th Street. Video installation. Exhibited at London: Legion TV, 10 July–9 August.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Feminist Review Collective 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LiteratureFilm and TheatreUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations