Feminist Review

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 30–45 | Cite as

researching sexual violence against older people: reflecting on the use of Freedom of Information requests in a feminist study

Article

abstract

Domestic and sexual violence research has traditionally been associated with feminist qualitative methodology; however, quantitative methods are increasingly used by feminists in research examining the prevalence of and issues related to rape and sexual assault, either as standalone methods or in combination with other, qualitative methods (i.e. mixed methods). Freedom of Information (FOI) requests are a data collection tool that allow citizens to obtain data held by public authorities in the UK and are particularly useful for uncovering information on marginalised groups who may be difficult to recruit in qualitative research. Whilst they are frequently used by journalists, their potential is yet to be fully realised by social researchers. This paper reflects on the use of Freedom of Information requests in a mixed-method feminist study exploring sexual violence against people aged 60 years and over.

keywords

Freedom of Information feminist research access to information sexual violence mixed methods research methods 

references

  1. Adam, D., 2015. Animal rights activist using FOI laws to target universities. The Guardian, 15 March. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/mar/15/animal-rights-freedom-information-universities [last accessed 11 November 2016].
  2. Avakame, E.F., 1999. Females’ labor force participation and intimate femicide: an empirical assessment of the backlash hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 14(3), pp. 277–291.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, H.N., 2005. Sexual offending on elderly women: a review. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16(1), pp. 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, H.N. and Fowler, D., 2008. Sexual offending against older female victims: an empirical study of the prevalence and characteristics of recorded offences in a semi-rural English county. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 19(1), pp. 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banisar, D., 2006. Freedom of Information Around the World 2006: A Global Survey of Access to Government Information Laws. London: Privacy International. Available at: http://www.privacyinternational.org/foi/foisurvey2006.pdf [last accessed 1 February 2010].
  6. Baron, L. and Straus, M., 1987. Four theories of rape: a macrosociological analysis. Social Problems, 34(5), pp. 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blood, I., 2004. Older Women and Domestic Violence: A Report for Help the Aged/hact. London: Help the Aged.Google Scholar
  8. Breiding, M.J., Smith, S.G., Basile, K.C., Walters, M.L., Chen, J. and Merrick, M.T., 2014. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly (MMWR) Report Surveillance Summaries, 63(8), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. British Society of Criminology, 2015. British Society of Criminology Statement of Ethics. London: British Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, K.J., 2009. COUNTERBLAST: Freedom of Information as a research tool: realising its potential. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(1), pp. 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brownmiller, S., 2013, [1975]. Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. New York: Open Road Integrated Media.Google Scholar
  12. Bryman, A.W., 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), pp. 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burgess, A.W. and Clements, P., 2006. Information processing of sexual abuse in elders. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 2(3), pp. 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byrne, M., 2003. Freedom of information in the post-communist world. Problems of Post-Communism, 50(2), p. 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calasanti, T., 2004. Feminist gerontology and old men. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(6), pp. S305–S314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cannell, M.B., Manini, T., Spence-Almaguer, E., Maldonado-Molina, M. and Andresen, E.M., 2014. US population estimates and correlates of sexual abuse of community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 26(4), pp. 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daly, K. and Chesney-Lind, M., 1988. Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), pp. 497–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Driscoll, D.L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P. and Rupert, D.J., 2007. Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: how to and why not. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 3(1), pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
  19. Farrukh, A. and Mayberry, J.F., 2015. Ethnic variations in the provision of biologic therapy for Crohn’s disease: a Freedom of Information study. Medico-Legal Journal, 83(2), pp. 104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fowler, A.J., Agha, R.A., Camm, C.F. and Littlejohns, P., 2013. The UK Freedom of Information Act (2000) in healthcare research: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 3(11), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freedom of Information Act 2000, 2000. Chapter 36. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/contents [last accessed 10 April 2017].
  22. Freedom of Information Act (Scotland) 2002, 2002. Act of Parliament 13. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2002/13/contents [last accessed 10 April 2017].
  23. Freixas, A., Luque, B. and Reina, A., 2012. Critical feminist gerontology: in the back room of research. Journal of Women and Aging, 24(1), pp. 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G. and Wiles, R., 2007. Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens: negotiating consent in child-and youth-orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), pp. 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodgkin, S., 2008. Telling it all: a story of women’s social capital using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), pp. 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooyman, N., Browne, C.V., Ray, R. and Richardson, V., 2002. Feminist gerontology and the life course. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 22(4), pp. 3–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeary, K., 2005. Sexual abuse and sexual offending against elderly people: a focus on perpetrators and victims. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16(2), pp. 328–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, H., and Powell, J., 2006. Old age, vulnerability and sexual violence: implications for knowledge and practice. International Nursing Review, 53, pp. 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelly, L., 1988. Surviving Sexual Violence. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kelly, L., 2013. Surviving Sexual Violence. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kidder, L.H. and Fine, M., 1987. Qualitative and quantitative methods: when stories converge. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987(35), pp. 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lea, S.J., Hunt, L. and Shaw, S., 2011. Sexual assault of older women by strangers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), pp. 2303–2320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, R.M., 2005. The UK Freedom of Information Act and social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), pp.1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mann, R., Horsley, P., Barrett, C. and Tinny, J., 2014. Norma’s Project: A Research Study into the Sexual Assault of Older Women in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
  35. Miner-Rubino, K. and Jayaratne, T.E., 2007. Feminist survey research. In S. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy, eds. Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd., pp. 293–326.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of Justice, 2008. Freedom of Information Act 2000: Third Annual Report on the Operation of the FOI Act in Central Government 2007. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  37. Murray, C., 2012. Sport in care: using freedom of information requests to elicit data about looked after children’s involvement in physical activity. British Journal of Social Work, 43(7), pp. 1347–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oakley, A., 1974. The Sociology of Housework. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  39. Oakley, A., 1998. Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32(4), pp. 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oakley, A., 1999. Peoples way of knowing: gender and methodology. In S. Hood., B. Mayall and S. Oliver, eds. Critical Issues in Social Research. Open University Press, pp. 154–170.Google Scholar
  41. Office of National Statistics, 2015. Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences, 2013/14. London: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
  42. Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J., 2002. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage Publications Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ramin, S.M., Satin, A.J., Stone Jr., I.C. and Wendel Jr., G.D., 1992. Sexual assault in postmenopausal women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 80(5), pp. 860–864.Google Scholar
  44. Reinharz, S., 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sanghera, G.S. and Thapar-Björkert, S., 2008. Methodological dilemmas: gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(3), pp. 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sarantakos, S., 2012. Social Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Savage, A. and Hyde, R., 2014. Using freedom of information requests to facilitate research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(3), pp. 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scully, D., 1990. Understanding Sexual Violence: A Study of Convicted Rapists. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  49. Sexual Offences Act 2003, 2003. Chapter 42. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/contents [last accessed 10 April 2017].
  50. Shapiro, M., Setterlund, D. and Cragg, C., 2003. Capturing the complexity of women’s experiences: a mixed-method approach to studying incontinence in older women. Affilia, 18(1), pp. 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson, G., 2010. Domestic Violence Statistics, Home Office Library Standard Note. London: UK Home Office.Google Scholar
  52. Walby, K. and Larsen, M., 2012. Access to information and freedom of information requests: neglected means of data production in the social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), pp. 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walby, S. and Allen, J., 2004. Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. Google Scholar
  54. Westmarland, N., 2001. The quantitative/qualitative debate and feminist research: a subjective view of objectivity. Qualitative Social Research, 2(1). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/974 [last accessed 11 November 2016].
  55. Whittaker, T., 1995. Violence, gender and elder abuse: towards a feminist analysis and practice. Journal of Gender Studies, 4(1), pp. 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. World Health Organisation, 2013. Violence Against Women: Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Against Women. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Feminist Review Collective 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Durham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations