Skip to main content
Log in

Triggering populist support in Europe: how internal political efficacy shapes the effect of economic vulnerability on party preferences

  • Research Note
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When and why do economic grievances result in support for populist parties? We address a long-standing puzzle in understanding populist voters. Existing studies have produced mixed results about how economic characteristics drive support for populist parties. We argue this is because scholars have overlooked the central importance of internal political efficacy, i.e., a belief in one’s ability to affect political outcomes. Using three pooled waves of the European Social Survey (ESS 2014, 2016, and 2018) with over 80,000 individual observations over time, we find that the economic determinants of populist support are contingent on internal political efficacy. Although there are reasons to think that the combined effect of economic circumstances and efficacy may be stronger on support for the populist left because of their stronger emphasis on social justice, we do not find evidence of this with the limited observations of the populist left in our sample. Critically, our findings contrast with the simplified and theoretically unsatisfying explanations of populist support we often encounter in the literature that are based solely on economic dissatisfaction. Instead, our results imply that recent trends in European politics are not only about economic issues but also about a voter’s belief in having agency and competence to affect change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data availability

Replication files have been made available through Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TIE4FL

References

  • Algan, Y., Guriev, S., Papaioannou, E., and E. Passari. 2017. The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 309–400.

  • Brady, H.E., S. Verba, and K.L. Schlozman. 1995. Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., G. Gurin, and W.E. Miller. 1954. The voter decides. Oxford: Row, Peterson, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Matteo, D., and I. Mariotti. 2021. Italian discontent and right-wing populism: Determinants, geographies, patterns. Regional Science Policy & Practice 13 (2): 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, B., N. Spierings, and M. Van Klingeren. 2022. Constructing homonationalist identities in relation to religious and LGBTQ+ outgroups: A case study of r/RightWingLGBT. Identities 29 (4): 518–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D¨oring, H., and P. Manow. 2018. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies.

  • Ernst, N., S. Engesser, F. Büchel, S. Blassnig, and F. Esser. 2017. Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1347–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESS (n.d.), ‘European social survey’, https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data. Accessed: 2023-11-02.

  • Geurkink, B., A. Zaslove, R. Sluiter, and K. Jacobs. 2020. Populist attitudes, political trust, and external political efficacy: old wine in new bottles? Political Studies 68 (1): 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidron, N., and P.A. Hall. 2017. The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology 68: S57–S84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, J., J. Lim, and J.-J. Spoon. 2019. The path from trade to right-wing populism in Europe. Electoral Studies 60: 102038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal.

  • Ivarsflaten, E. 2008. What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe?: Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies 41 (1): 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmers, R. 2017. Channelling discontent? Non-voters, populist party voters, and their meaningful political agency. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 4 (4): 381–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kestilä, E. 2006. Is there demand for radical right populism in the finnish electorate? Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (3): 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnamäki, K. 2022. Not in front of the child: Illiberal familism and the Hungarian anti-LGBTQ+ “Child Protective Law.” Politics and Governance 10 (4): 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, G. 2017. It’s the emotions, Stupid! Anger about the economic crisis, low political efficacy, and support for populist parties. Electoral Studies 50: 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manifesto Project Database (n.d.), https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/.

  • March, L. 2017. Left and right populism compared: The British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (2): 282–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markou, G. 2021. The systemic metamorphosis of Greece’s once radical left-wing SYRIZA party. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/rethinking-populism/the-systemic-metamorphosis-of-greeces-once-radical-left-wing-syriza-party/.

  • Meijers, M.J., and A. Zaslove. 2021. Measuring populism in political parties: Appraisal of a new approach. Comparative Political Studies 54 (2): 372–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridges: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nordsieck, W. (n.d.), Parties and Elections in Europe. http://www.parties-and-elections.eu/.

  • Obradović, S., S.A. Power, and J. Sheehy-Skeffington. 2020. Understanding the psychological appeal of populism. Current Opinion in Psychology 35: 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C., J. Mendez, and R. Herrick. 2009. The negative effects of populism on gay and lesbian rights*. Social Science Quarterly 90 (1): 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, T.S. 2016. Modern populism: Research advances, conceptual and methodological pitfalls, and the minimal definition. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

  • Pirro, A.L. 2014. Populist radical right parties in central and eastern Europe: The different context and issues of the prophets of the patria. Government and Opposition 49 (04): 600–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico, G., M. Guinjoan, and E. Anduiza. 2017. The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 444–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico, G., M. Guinjoan, and E. Anduiza. 2020. Empowered and enraged: Political efficacy, anger and support for populism in Europe. European Journal of Political Research 59 (4): 797–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M. 2018. What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review 10 (3): 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M., and B. Burgoon. 2018. The paradox of well-being: Do unfavorable socioeconomic and sociocultural contexts deepen or dampen radical left and right voting among the less well-off? Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1720–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M., B. Burgoon, E.J. van Elsas, and H.G. van de Werfhorst. 2017. Radical distinction: Support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics 18 (4): 536–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M., W. van der Brug, and S.L. de Lange. 2016. ‘Expressing or fuelling discon- tent? The Relationship between Populist Voting and Political Discontent’, Electoral Studies 43: 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M., and C. Von Scheve. 2017. Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information 56 (4): 567–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipma, T., and M. Lubbers. 2020. Contextual-level unemployment and support for radical-right parties: A meta-analysis. Acta Politica 55 (3): 351–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipma, T., M. Lubbers, and N. Spierings. 2023. Working class economic insecurity and voting for radical right and radical left parties. Social Science Research 109: 102778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, B., G. Keppens, and F. Van Droogenbroeck. 2016. Who supports populism and what attracts people to it? Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staerklé, C., and E.G.T. Green. 2018. Right-wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 28 (6): 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsatsanis, E., I. Andreadis, and E. Teperoglou. 2018. Populism from Below: Socio-economic and Ideological Correlates of Mass Attitudes in Greece. South European Society and Pol- Itics 23 (4): 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hauwaert, S.M., and S. van Kessel. 2018. Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research 57 (1): 68–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kessel, S. 2015. Populist Parties in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vercesi, M. 2023. Society and territory: Making sense of Italian populism from a historical perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 31 (1): 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlandas, T., and D. Halikiopoulou. 2019. Does unemployment matter? Economic insecurity, labour market policies and the far-right vote in Europe. European Political Science 18 (3): 421–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marija Verner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 691 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verner, M., Bačovský, P. & Wilson Sokhey, S. Triggering populist support in Europe: how internal political efficacy shapes the effect of economic vulnerability on party preferences. Eur Polit Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00462-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00462-5

Keywords

Navigation