Skip to main content
Log in

Towards an EU framework for a just transition: welfare policies and politics for the socio-ecological transition

  • Special Issue article
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we argue that, since the publication of the European Green Deal, an EU framework for a just transition is gradually emerging, consisting of legislation, funding and guidelines to ensure that the opportunities deriving from the green transition are exploited, while the related social challenges are addressed. Relying on qualitative research methods, we first identify the features of key EU policy instruments for a just transition and, in particular, the role therein attributed to welfare policies. Second, we provide insights on the political dynamics behind the emergence and design of these policies. Hence, we build a bridge between the eco-social debate and political science, focusing on both EU level policies and politics. We conclude that, while a number of initiatives for a just transition have been elaborated by the EU in recent years, such an EU framework should be further developed, including by focusing more on providing citizens with financial 'buffers' and ensuring consensus on the green transition through social and civic dialogue. Considering the politics behind these EU eco-social policies, we find that their emergence has been characterised by both incremental and transformative elements, while their features have been affected by traditional conflict lines characterising EU politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. From a distributional point of view, a just transition would imply that both the opportunities and the costs deriving from the transition should be shared in a fair way, addressing current and potential inequalities between individuals, social groups, sectors of the economy, communities, regions and countries. From a procedural point of view, the participation of citizens and stakeholders in the decision-making process and in policy implementation should be ensured.

References

  • Bongardt, A., and F. Torres. 2022. The European Green Deal: More than an Exit Strategy to the Pandemic Crisis, a Building Block of a Sustainable European Economic Model. Journal of Common Market Studies 60(1): 170–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büchs, M., N. Bardsley, and S. Duwe. 2011. Who Bears the Brunt? Distributional Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Policies. Critical Social Policy 31(2): 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, G. 2016. Critical junctures. In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, ed. O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti, and A. Sheingate, 89–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, B. 2023. Unpacking the Eco-social Perspective in European Policy, Politics and Polity Dimensions. European Political Science 18(1): 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the EU. 2022. ‘Fit for 55 Package: Council Reaches General Approaches Relating to Emissions Reductions and Their Social Impacts. Press Release, 29 June 2022.

  • Dryzek, J. 2013. The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2016. Clean Energy for All Europeans, COM (2016) 860 final. Brussels 30 (11): 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2019. ‘The European Green Deal’, Communication from the Commission, COM (2019) 640 final. Brussels 11(12): 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2020. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the Just Transition Fund. COM (2020) 22 Final, Brussels, 14 January 2020.

  • European Commission. 2021a. Commission Staff Working Document on the Territorial Just Transition Plans. SWD (2021) 275 Final, Brussels, 23 September 2021.

  • European Commission. 2021b. Guidance to Member States Recovery and Resilience Plans’, SWD, PART 1/2, SWD (2021) 12 final, 22 January 2021.

  • European Commission. 2021c. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Social Climate Fund. COM (2021) 568 Final, Brussels, 14 July 2021.

  • Ferrera, M. 2017. The Stein Rokkan lecture 2016. Mission impossible? Reconciling economic and social Europe after the euro crisis and Brexit. European Journal of Political Research 5(6): 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galgóczi, B., and P. Pochet. 2022. Introduction. Welfare States Confronted by the Challenge of Climate Change: A Short Review of the Issues and Possible Impacts. Transfer 28(3): 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. 2019. Necessities and Luxuries: How to Combine Redistribution with Sustainable Consumption. In What Next for Sustainable Development? Our Common Future at Thirty, ed. J. Meadowcroft, D. Banister, E. Holden, O. Langhelle, K. Linnerud, and G. Gilpin, 138–158. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, P. 2023. The Politics of the EU Eco-Social Policies. European Political Science.

  • ILO. 2015. Guidelines for a Just Transition Towards Environmentally Sustainable Economies and Societies for All. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessoula, M., and M. Mandelli. 2022. Eco-social Mobilization at the Supranational Level? The Case of The Right to Energy for All Europeans Coalition. In Towards Sustainable Welfare States in Europe, ed. M. Schoyen, B. Hvinden, and M. Dotterud Leiren. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J.W. 2014. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Pierson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. 1984. Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics 16(2): 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriazi, A., and J. Miró. 2023. Towards a Socially Fair Green Transition in the EU? An Analysis of the Just Transition Fund Using the Multiple Streams Framework. Comparative European Politics 21: 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, E. 2021. The European Green Deal: From Growth Strategy to Social-Ecological Transition? In Social Policy in the European Union: State of the Play 2020. Facing the Pandemic, ed. B. Vanhercke, S. Spasova, and B. Fronteddu, 97–111. Brussels: European Social Observatory and European Trade Union Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. 1994. The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics 17(3): 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelli, M. 2022. Understanding eco-social Policies: A Proposed Definition and Typology. Transfer 28(3): 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelli, M., S. Sabato, and M. Jessoula. 2021. EU Economic Governance and the Socio Ecological Transition. Towards a More Sustainable European Semester? Politiche Sociali 3(2021): 619–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D., and R. Heffron. 2018. Just Transition: Integrating Climate, Energy and Environmental Justice. Energy Policy 119: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., and D. Mulvaney. 2013. The Political Economy of the ‘Just Transition.’ The Geographical Journal 179(2): 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. 2022. Fit for 55: Social Climate Fund to Combat Energy and Mobility Poverty. Press Release, 18-05-2022.

  • Petmesidou, M., and A.M. Guillén. 2022. Europe’s Green, Digital and Demographic Transition: A Social Policy Research Perspective. Transfer 28(3): 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in Time. History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, S., and M. Mandelli. 2021. Integrating the Sustainable Development Goals into the European Semester: A Governance Conundrum for the von der Leyen Commission? In Social Policy in the European Union State of Play 2020 Facing the Pandemic, ed. B. Vanhercke, S. Spasova, and B. Fronteddu, 113–132. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and European Social Observatory (OSE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, S., M. Mandelli, and M. Jessoula. 2022. Towards an EU Eco-social Agenda? From Europe 2020 to the European Green Deal. In Towards Sustainable Welfare States in Europe, ed. M. Schoyen, B. Hvinden, and M. Dotterud Leiren, 199–219. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, S. and B. Fronteddu 2020. A socially just transition through the European Green Deal? Working Paper 2020.08, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.

  • Sabato, S., M. Mandelli and B. Vanhercke (2021) ‘The Socio-Ecological Dimension of the EU Recovery. From the European Green Deal to the Recovery and Resilience Facility’, Madrid: EUROsociAL Programme, EUROsociAL Collection No 24.

  • Stevis, D., E. Morena, and D. Krause. 2020. Introduction: The Genealogy and Contemporary Politics of Just Transitions. In Just Transitions: Social Justice in the Shift Towards a Low-Carbon World, ed. E. Morena, D. Krause, and D. Stevis, 1–31. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., and W. Thelen, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. 2021a. Regulation (EU) 2021/1056 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 establishing the Just Transition Fund. Official Journal of the European Union, L 231/1, 30 June 2021.

  • European Union. 2021b. Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 Establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 57, 18 February 2021.

  • European Union. 2023. Regulation establishing a Social Climate Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060. 2021/0206 (COD), Brussels, 20 April 2023.

  • Vesan, P., and F. Corti. 2019. New Tensions over Social Europe? The European Pillar of Social Rights and the Debate within the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(5): 977–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A., and M. Pari. 2022. Social Climate Fund: Fit for 55 Package’, Briefing, European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 698.777–June 2022.

  • Wright, E.O. 2013. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastiano Sabato.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabato, S., Mandelli, M. Towards an EU framework for a just transition: welfare policies and politics for the socio-ecological transition. Eur Polit Sci 23, 14–26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00458-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00458-1

Keywords

Navigation