Abstract
This symposium adds to the growing literature on gender differences in authorship and reviews written by male and female scholars in major European political science journals. The contributions capturing European Union Politics (EUP), the Journal of Common Market Studies (JCMS), West European Politics (WEP) and Southern European Society and Politics (SESP) confirm the male dominance in articles published and reviews written. The articles also illustrate that the gender gap in publishing mainly results from a submission gap with male scholars outnumbering female scholars at submission stage. For reviews, there is a double gender gap. Female scholars are less solicited for a review, and if asked to review for a journal, they are more likely to decline the review invitation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The gender gap in political science publishing seems to be even wider in books than in journal articles. For instance, Samuels and Teele (2021) find that “women remain underrepresented as book authors relative to their numbers in the discipline” and relative even to their contributions to journals.
References
Abu-Laban, Y. 2016. Representing a diverse Canada in political science: Power, ideas and the emergent challenge of reconciliation. European Political Science 15 (4): 493–507.
Boring, A. 2017. Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics 145 (1): 27–41.
Candido, M.R., L.A. Campos, and J. Feres. 2021. The gendered division of labor in Brazilian political science journals. Brazilian Political Science Review 15 (3): 1–33.
Closa, C., C. Moury, Z. Novakova, M. Qvortrup, and B. Ribeiro. 2020. Mind the (submission) gap: EPSR gender data and female authors publishing perceptions. European Political Science 19 (3): 428–442.
Curtin, J. 2013. Women and political science in New Zealand: The state of the discipline. Political Science 65 (1): 63–83.
Deschouwer, K. 2020. Reducing gender inequalities in ECPR publications. European Political Science 19 (3): 411–415.
Grossman, E. 2020. A gender bias in the European journal of political research? European Political Science 19 (3): 416–427.
Peterson, D.A. 2018. Historical disparities and gendered citation patterns. Political Analysis 26 (3): 338–344.
Samuels, D.J., and D.L. Teele. 2021. New medium, same story? Gender gaps in book publishing. Political Science and Politics 54 (1): 131–140.
Saraceno, J. 2020. Disparities in a flagship political science journal? Analyzing publication patterns in the journal of politics, 1939–2019. Journal of Politics 82 (4): 45–55.
Smith, A.E., H. Hardt, P. Meister, and H.J. Kim. 2020. Gender, race, age, and national origin predict whether faculty assign female-authored readings in graduate syllabi. PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 100–106.
Squazzoni, F., G. Bravo, M. Farjam, A. Marusic, B. Mehmani, M. Willis, A. Birukou, P. Dondio, and F. Grimaldo. 2021. Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0299.
Stockemer, D., A. Blair, and E. Rashkova. 2020. The distribution of authors and reviewers in EPS. European Political Science 19 (3): 401–420.
Tatalovich, R., and J. Frendreis. 2019. Winning awards and gaining recognition: An impact analysis of APSA section book prizes. The Social Science Journal 56 (3): 316–323.
Teele, D.L., and K. Thelen. 2017. Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science. Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 433–447.
Tudor, C., and D. Yashar. 2018. Gender and the editorial process: World politics, 2007–2017. PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 870–880.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stockemer, D. Introduction: the gendered distribution of authors and reviewers in major European political science journals. Eur Polit Sci 21, 413–416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00357-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00357-3