Skip to main content

Introduction: the gendered distribution of authors and reviewers in major European political science journals

Abstract

This symposium adds to the growing literature on gender differences in authorship and reviews written by male and female scholars in major European political science journals. The contributions capturing European Union Politics (EUP), the Journal of Common Market Studies (JCMS), West European Politics (WEP) and Southern European Society and Politics (SESP) confirm the male dominance in articles published and reviews written. The articles also illustrate that the gender gap in publishing mainly results from a submission gap with male scholars outnumbering female scholars at submission stage. For reviews, there is a double gender gap. Female scholars are less solicited for a review, and if asked to review for a journal, they are more likely to decline the review invitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. The gender gap in political science publishing seems to be even wider in books than in journal articles. For instance, Samuels and Teele (2021) find that “women remain underrepresented as book authors relative to their numbers in the discipline” and relative even to their contributions to journals.

References

  • Abu-Laban, Y. 2016. Representing a diverse Canada in political science: Power, ideas and the emergent challenge of reconciliation. European Political Science 15 (4): 493–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, A. 2017. Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics 145 (1): 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candido, M.R., L.A. Campos, and J. Feres. 2021. The gendered division of labor in Brazilian political science journals. Brazilian Political Science Review 15 (3): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Closa, C., C. Moury, Z. Novakova, M. Qvortrup, and B. Ribeiro. 2020. Mind the (submission) gap: EPSR gender data and female authors publishing perceptions. European Political Science 19 (3): 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, J. 2013. Women and political science in New Zealand: The state of the discipline. Political Science 65 (1): 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschouwer, K. 2020. Reducing gender inequalities in ECPR publications. European Political Science 19 (3): 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, E. 2020. A gender bias in the European journal of political research? European Political Science 19 (3): 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D.A. 2018. Historical disparities and gendered citation patterns. Political Analysis 26 (3): 338–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, D.J., and D.L. Teele. 2021. New medium, same story? Gender gaps in book publishing. Political Science and Politics 54 (1): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, J. 2020. Disparities in a flagship political science journal? Analyzing publication patterns in the journal of politics, 1939–2019. Journal of Politics 82 (4): 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.E., H. Hardt, P. Meister, and H.J. Kim. 2020. Gender, race, age, and national origin predict whether faculty assign female-authored readings in graduate syllabi. PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, F., G. Bravo, M. Farjam, A. Marusic, B. Mehmani, M. Willis, A. Birukou, P. Dondio, and F. Grimaldo. 2021. Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockemer, D., A. Blair, and E. Rashkova. 2020. The distribution of authors and reviewers in EPS. European Political Science 19 (3): 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatalovich, R., and J. Frendreis. 2019. Winning awards and gaining recognition: An impact analysis of APSA section book prizes. The Social Science Journal 56 (3): 316–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teele, D.L., and K. Thelen. 2017. Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science. Political Science and Politics 50 (2): 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, C., and D. Yashar. 2018. Gender and the editorial process: World politics, 2007–2017. PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 870–880.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Stockemer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stockemer, D. Introduction: the gendered distribution of authors and reviewers in major European political science journals. Eur Polit Sci 21, 413–416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00357-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00357-3

Keywords

  • Gender gap
  • Publishing
  • Reviewing