Skip to main content

Who governs Europe? A new historical dataset on governments and party systems since 1848

Abstract

Comprising 172 years of European history (from 1848 to 2020), the Who governs dataset provides comprehensive and highly detailed information on the partisan composition of European governments, matching these data with information on those aspects of party politics that can either help to understand the dynamics of the governmental arena or are under the direct influence of the composition of governments. Most of the variables represent fundamental and well-established dimensions of party politics, such as the number of new parties or the fragmentation of the party systems, but some, most importantly party system closure, are more novel. Variables have been designed so that they can be applied to a maximum number of cases across time. Currently the dataset includes 68 different historical democratic periods, 753 elections, and more than 1817 parties and 1586 cases of government formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Source: Casal Bértoa (2021)

Fig. 2

Source: Casal Bértoa (2021)

Fig. 3

Source: Casal Bértoa (2021)

Fig. 4

Source: Casal Bértoa (2021)

Fig. 5

Source: Casal Bértoa (2021)

Notes

  1. In terms of cabinets the main comparable datasets are Nyrup and Bramwell (2020), Sonntag (2020), EJPR PDY (2020), Woldendorp et al. (2011), Cusack and Fuchs (2003), and Döring and Manow (2020) (the latter does not include information on individual ministerial composition).

  2. To be found at https://whogoverns.eu/.

  3. For example, according to Polity IV, Greece was already democratic (i.e. achieved a score of 7) in 1864; however, governments were formed at the exclusive will of the King until 1875 (Dimitropoulos 2004). This is still the case in Monaco (Grinda 2007). Similarly, the UK had a score of 7 already in 1880, but it did not introduce universal male suffrage until 1918. Conversely, Denmark introduced the latter in 1849 and parliamentarism in 1901, but it did not achieve a score of 6 in the Polity IV index until 1911.

  4. For this reason, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus is not included. Czechia and Slovakia are considered to be different entities from their Czechoslovak predecessor, and the same principle was applied to the Yugoslav Kingdom and its successors, Croatia, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia.

  5. In this context it answers Veenendaal and Corbett’s (2015) recent call to integrate micro-states into the analysis of (European) politics.

  6. According to Polity IV, France’s democratic history starts in 1848, and therefore the so-called First Republic is not part of the dataset.

  7. The 1971 ‘military memorandum’ left the party system almost entirely intact and therefore it is considered to be only a minor rupture.

  8. See https://whogoverns.eu/cabinets/.

  9. Other datasets (e.g. Döring and Manow 2020; EJPR PDY 2020; Sonntag 2020; Woldendorp et al. 2011) record just two cabinets, one before and one after the Freedom Union left the government in June 2000.

  10. Gallagher (1991).

  11. On the basis of Sikk’s (2005) definition.

  12. For an in-depth explanation of how this variable is constructed, please see Casal Bértoa and Enyedi (2021: 150–152) or visit https://whogoverns.eu/party-systems/party-institutionalization/.

  13. For details see Casal Bértoa and Enyedi (2021).

  14. A similar operationalization of polarization can be found in Powell (1982), Karvonen and Quenter (2002) and Casal Bértoa and Weber (2019).

  15. See https://whogoverns.eu/party-systems/polarization/.

  16. Especially the Keesing’s Record of World Events and the Economist Intelligence Unit.

  17. We would like to thank here the financial support of the Nottingham Research Fellowship and the invaluable help in terms of source collection and language translation of 10 research assistants.

  18. The latter two datasets have a broader geographical scope but they are confined to the post-1945 period.

  19. The database will continue to be updated on a yearly basis.

  20. The number of democratic periods taken into account varies between 1 (most countries) and 4 (France and Greece).

  21. Based on Elgie (2018).

  22. The number of electoral cycles taken into account varies between 1 (e.g. Greece’s post-WWII Kingdom or Poland’s First Republic) and 35 (Switzerland).

  23. The number of cabinets per country varies between 1 (post-revolutionary Armenia and post-WWII Czechoslovakia) and 96 (France’s Third Republic).

  24. From the first decade of the twentieth century onwards there are at least five systems at each point in time that can be considered democratic.

References

  • Abedi, A. 2004. Anti-political establishment parties. A comparative analysis. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bacciocchi, L. 1999. Dall’Arengo alla Democrazia dei Partiti: Legislazione Elettorale e Sistema Politico a San Marino. San Marino: Edizioni del Titano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S., and P. Mair. 1990. Identity, competition, and electoral availability: The stabilization of European electorates, 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, N.-C., and M. Golder. 2013. Democratic electoral systems around the world. Electoral Studies 32 (2): 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casal Bértoa, F. 2021. Database on WHO GOVERNS in Europe and beyond, PSGo. whogoverns.eu

  • Casal Bértoa, F., and P. Mair. 2012. Party system institutionalization across time in post-communist Europe. In Party government in the new Europe, ed. Ferdinand Müller-Rommel and Hans Keman. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casal Bértoa, F., and T. Weber. 2019. Restrained change: Party systems in times of economic crises. Journal of Politics 81 (1): 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casal Bértoa, F., and Z. Enyedi. 2016. Party system closure and openness: conceptualization, operationalization and validation. Party Politics 22 (3): 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casal Bértoa, F., and Z. Enyedi. 2021. Party system closure: Party alliances, government alternatives, and democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, T. R. and S. Fuchs. 2003. Parties, Government and legislature dataset. https://www.wzb.eu/en/node/113/subpage/5662

  • Dimitropoulos, A. Y. 2004. ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΕΣ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΕΙΣ [The Greek Governments]. Athens. http://www.greeklaws.com/pubs/uploads/842.pdf

  • Döring, H. and Ph. Manow. 2020. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. http://www.parlgov.org/

  • Economist Intelligence Unit (multiple years). eiu.com

  • EJPR PDY .2020. Political data yearbook. https://www.politicaldatayearbook.com/

  • Elgie, R. 2018. Semi-presidentialism, premier-presidentialism and president-parliamentarism. A new country-years dataset. http://www.semipresidentialism.com/semi-presidentialism-premier-presidentialism-and-president-parliamentarism-a-new-country-years-dataset/

  • Emanuele, V. 2015. Dataset of electoral volatility and its internal components in Western Europe (1945–2015). https://doi.org/10.7802/1112

  • Emanuele, V. 2016. Dataset of new parties and party system innovation in Western Europe since 1945. https://doi.org/10.7802/1363

  • Gallagher, M. 1991. Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. 2019. Election Indices Dataset. http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/index.php

  • Gallagher, M., M. Laver, and P. Mair. 2011. Representative government in modern Europe. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinda, G. 2007. The principality of Monaco: State, international status, institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S.P. 1991. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, L., and S. Quenter. 2002. Electoral systems, party system fragmentation and government stability. In Authoritarianism and democracy in Europe, 1919–1939. Comparative Analyses, ed. Dirk Berg-Schlosser and Jeremy Mitchell. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keesing’s Record of World Events. London: Longman (multiple years)

  • Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. ‘Effective’ number of parties. A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. G, Gurr, T. R. and K. Jaggers. 2019. Polity IV project dataset. Center for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html

  • Müller, W.C., and K. Strøm, eds. 2000. Coalition governments in Western Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Rommel, F., K. Fettelschoss, and P. Harfst. 2004. Party government in central eastern European democracies. European Journal of Political Research 43: 869–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D., and P. Stöver. 2010. Elections in Europe. A data handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Centre for Research Data-NSD. 2020. European Election Database. http://www.nsd.uib.no/european_election_database/about/about_data.html

  • Nyrup, J. and S. Bramwell. 2020. “Who governs? A new global dataset on member of cabinets. American Political Science Review

  • Pedersen, M.N. 1979. The Dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research 7 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B.G. 1982. Contemporary democracies: Participation, stability, and violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., and T. Mackie. 1991. The international almanac of electoral history. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikk, A. 2005. How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 44 (3): 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, L. 2020. Politica—Governments, elections and party leaders. http://www.kolumbus.fi/taglarsson/dokumentit/governm2.htm

  • Veenendaal, W.P., and J. Corbett. 2015. Why small states offer important answers to large questions. Comparative Political Studies 48 (4): 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J., Keman, H. and I. Budge. 2011. Party Government in 40 Democracies 1945–2008: Composition, duration, personnel. https://fsw.vu.nl/en/departments/political-science-and-public-administration/staff/woldendorp/party-government-data-set/index.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Casal Bértoa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 131 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 405 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casal Bértoa, F., Enyedi, Z. Who governs Europe? A new historical dataset on governments and party systems since 1848. Eur Polit Sci 21, 150–164 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00342-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00342-w

Keywords

  • Dataset
  • Elections
  • Europe
  • Governments
  • Institutionalization
  • Party systems
  • Political parties