Hearing everyone in the feedback loop: using the new discussion platform, Unitu, to enhance the staff and student dialogue

Abstract

Changes within the higher education sector have started to redefine some aspects of the relationship between the learner and the learning institution. In particular, there is now significantly more emphasis on ‘the student voice’, whether as a form of ‘customer’ feedback or as a vehicle for change in which students become active agents supporting enhanced provision within their learning environments. Institutions have become increasingly cognisant of the need to increase the amount, timeliness and ease with which students can provide feedback. This article will explore the design, implementation and impact of a project to introduce a new student discussion platform, Unitu, into the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Reading from 2015 to 2016. It finds that this form of online engagement, together with the functionality of the platform, has the potential to encourage student feedback, indicate how representative this feedback is, support the role of student representatives, enable timely staff–student dialogue and enhance the visibility of institutional responses in order to help improve teaching and learning provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bates, L. 2015. Female academics face huge sexist bias-no wonder there are so few of them. The Guardian, 13th February. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2015/feb/13/female-academics-huge-sexist-bias-students. Accessed August 30, 2018.

  2. Benevenuto, F., T. Rodrigues, M. Cha, and V. Almeida. 2009. Characterizing User Behaviour in Online Social Networks. https://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~fabricio/download/imc126-benevenuto.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2019.

  3. Blair, E., and K. Valdez Noel. 2014. Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39(7): 879–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blair, E. 2017. Hearing the student voice: finding value in feedback. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/education/2017/05/04/hearing-the-student-voice-finding-value-in-feedback/. Accessed August 30, 2018.

  5. Brennan, J., and R. Williams. 2004. Collecting and using Student Feedback: A guide to good practice. New York: Learning and Teaching Support Network. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/id352_collecting_and_using_student_feedback_a_guide_to_good_practice.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2018.

  6. Brooman, S., S. Darwent, and A. Pimor. 2015. The student voice in higher education curriculum design: is there value in listening? Innovations in Education and Teaching international 52(6): 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bunce, L., A. Baird, and S. Jones. 2017. The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education 42(11): 1958–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canning, J. 2015. Conceptualising student voice in UK higher education: four theoretical lenses. Teaching in Higher Education 22(5): 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, F., L. Beasley, J. Eland, and A. Rumpus. 2007. Hearing the Student Voice: Promoting and encouraging the effective use of the student voice to enhance professional development in learning, teaching and assessment within higher education: Final Report. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/13053/. Accessed April 4, 2019.

  10. Chiyevo Garwe, E. 2015. Student voice and quality enhancement in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 7(2): 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clarkson, J. 2017. The right tools for the job: Harnessing the power of student voice through HearNow. http://www.efficiencyexchange.ac.uk/12460/the-right-tools-for-the-job-harnessing-the-power-of-student-voice-through-hearnow/. Accessed March 26, 2019.

  12. Dearing, R. 1997. Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. 2011. Students at the Heart of the System. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dickinson, L., and A. Fox. 2016. Who owns the student voice? A study of students’ perceptions of student voice in higher education. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change. https://journals.gre.ac.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/233. Accessed August 30, 2018.

  15. Electric Paper. 2013. Closing the Loop: Are universities doing enough to act on student feedback from course evaluation surveys? http://www.evasys.co.uk/files/EP%20England/Research%20and%20Stories/EvaSys-Report-Closing-the-Loop.pdf. Accessed March 26, 2019.

  16. Hall, V. 2017. A tale of two narratives: student voice—what lies before us? Oxford Review of Education 43(2): 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Healey, M., A. Flint, and K. Harrington. 2014. Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. New York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teachinghigher-education. Accessed June 23, 2018.

  18. Koh, Y. 2014. Report: 44% of Twitter Accounts have never sent a Tweet. The Wall Street Journal, 11th April. https://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/04/11/new-data-quantifies-dearth-of-tweeters-on-twitter/. Accessed May 4, 2019.

  19. Lesnik-Oberstein, K. 2015. Let UK Universities Do What They Do BestTeaching and Research. The Guardian, 6th July. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jul/06/let-uk-universities-do-what-they-do-best-teaching-and-research. Accessed May 4, 2019.

  20. Mayhew, E. 2019. No longer a silent partner: How Mentimeter can enhance teaching and learning within political science. Journal of Political Science Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15512169.2018.1538882?journalCode=upse20. Accessed May 4, 2019.

  21. McLeod, J. 2011. Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education 52(2): 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Naylor, L., J. Lay, and C. Mattinson. 2017. Capturing the student voice: creating more effective mechanisms for listening. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change 3, no. (2), https://journals.gre.ac.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/528. Accessed August 30, 2018.

  23. Rudduck, J., and M. Fielding. 2006. Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review 58(2): 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, P., and O. Morris. 2011. Effective Course Evaluation—The Future for Quality Standards in Higher Education. London: Electric Paper Ltd. http://www.evasys.co.uk/files/EP%20England/Research%20and%20Stories/EvaSys-Report-Effective-Course-Evaluation.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2018.

  25. Smith, D. 2015. Effectively using discussion boards to engage students in introductory leadership courses. Journal of Leadership Education 14(2): 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spanner, L. 2018. Is student engagement empowering? http://tsep.org.uk/is-student-engagement-empowering/. Accessed August 30, 2018.

  27. Unitu. n.d. The Student Voice Platform. https://unitu.co.uk/. Accessed August 30, 2018.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Mayhew.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Mock-up example of student Course Hub only available to enrolled students

figurea

Appendix 2: Mock-up example of Departmental Feedback Board accessible to both enrolled students and nominated staff

figureb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayhew, E. Hearing everyone in the feedback loop: using the new discussion platform, Unitu, to enhance the staff and student dialogue. Eur Polit Sci 18, 714–728 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-019-00211-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Technology-enhanced learning
  • Student voice
  • Student feedback