Ballot box voting is the main mechanism of political choice in modern liberal democracies. It is also often thought of as the essence of political freedom. Traditional voting has significant virtues. But as a mechanism for exercising political freedom, ballot box voting has serious flaws. The average citizen has almost no chance of affecting the outcome of an electoral process. In part as a result, he or she also has strong incentives to make ill-informed and illogical decisions. “Voting with your feet” is a superior option on both fronts. It is thereby often a superior mechanism of political freedom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
The relevance of some other “voice” mechanisms is discussed later in this article.
For a leading modern work in this vein, see Nozick (1974).
See sources referenced in Somin (2016, 267 n. 127).
On the difficulties of determining whether and to what extent a “mandate” exists, see Grosssman et al. (2006).
Achen, C., and L. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ackerman, B., and J. Fishkin. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven: Yale University Press.
AMA Code of Medical Ethics. 2012. Opinion 8.08. http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2012/07/coet1-1207.html. Accessed 22 Nov 2018.
Bartels, Larry M. 2010. Unequal Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brennan, J. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Caplan, B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clemens, M. 2011. Economics and Emigration: Trillion Dollar Bills Left on the Sidewalk? Journal of Economic Perspectives 25: 83–106.
Clemens, M., and L. Pritchett. 2008. Income Per Natural: Measuring Development for People Rather than Places. Population and Development Review 34: 395–434.
Ellickson, R. 2012. Legal Sources of Residential Lock-Ins: Why French Households Move Half as Often as U.S. Households. University of Illinois Law Review 373–404: esp. 395–97.
Freedom House. 2016. Freedom in the World 2016. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2016. Accessed 22 Nov 2018.
Fishkin, J. 1979. Tyranny and Legitimacy: A Critique of Political Theories. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Frey, B. 2001. A Utopia? Government Without Territorial Monopoly. Independent Review 6: 99–112.
Frey, B. 2008. Happiness: A Revolution in Economics, 189–197. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gerken, H. 2005. Second Order Diversity. Harvard Law Review 118: 1099–1196.
Glaeser, E. 2017. Reforming Land Use Regulations. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/reforming-land-use-regulations/amp/. Accessed 22 Nov 2018.
Grosssman, D., P. Peterson, and J. Stimson. 2006. Mandate Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halperin, M., J. Siegle, and M. Weinstein. 2010. The Democracy Advantage, Rev ed. New York: Routledge.
Hirschman, A. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hobbes, T. 1991. Leviathan. In ed. R. Tuck. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huemer, M. 2010. Is There a Right to Immigrate? Social Theory and Practice 36: 429–461.
Huemer, M. 2013. The Problem of Political Authority. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Landemore, H. 2013. Deliberation, Cognitive Diversity, and Inclusiveness: An argument for the Random Selection of Representatives. Synthese 190: 1209–1231.
Leib, E. 2004. Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park: Penn State Press.
Locke, J. 1963. Second Treatise on Government. In ed. P. Laslett. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lopez-Guerra, C. 2010. The Enfranchisement Lottery. Philosophy, Politics, and Economics 10: 211–233.
Lopez-Guerra, C. 2014. Democracy and Disenfranchisement: The Morality of Electoral Exclusions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mutz, D. 2006. Hearing the Other Side. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, R. 2005. Private Neighborhoods and the Transformation of Local Government. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, the State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
O’Hara, E., and L. Ribstein. 2009. The Law Market. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oser, J., L. Leightley, and K. Winneg. 2014. Participation, Online and Otherwise: What’s the Difference for Policy Preferences? Social Science Quarterly 95: 259–277.
Pettit, P. 1996. Freedom as Antipower. Ethics 106: 576–604.
Pettit, P. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pettit, P. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory of Democracy and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plamenatz, J. 1968. Consent, Freedom, and Political Obligation, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plato, Crito. 1969. In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, eds. Hamilton E., and Cairns, H, 27.
Rhode, P., and K. Strumpf. 2003. Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1885 to 1990. American Economic Review 93: 1648–1677, 1649.
Schleicher, D. 2017. Stuck! The Law and Economics of Residential Stability. Yale Law Journal 127: 78–154.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
Shenkman, R. 2008. Just How Stupid Are We? Facing the Truth About the American Voter. New York: Basic Books.
Simmons, A.J. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligation, 136–139. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Somin, I. 2010. Deliberative Democracy and Political Ignorance. Critical Review 22: 253–279.
Somin, I. 2014a. In ‘Foot Voting, Federalism, and Political Freedom’, Nomos: Federalism and Subsidiarity, ed. J. Fleming and J. Levy. New York: New York University Press.
Somin, I. 2014b. Jury Ignorance and Political Ignorance. William and Mary Law Review 55: 1167–1193.
Somin, I. 2015. Rational Ignorance. In Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies, ed. M. Gross and L. McGoey. New York: Routledge.
Somin, I. 2016. Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter, Chapter 5, 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Somin, I. 2017. Foot Voting, Decentralization, and Development. Minnesota Law Review 102: 1649.
Somin, I. 2018. Foot Voting and the Future of Liberty. In The Future of Classical Liberalism, ed. T. Henderson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Somin, I. forthcoming. Free to Move: Foot Voting and Political Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Steinberger, P. 2004. The Idea of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stringham, E. 2015. Private Governance: Creating Order in Economic and Social Life, 131. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tai-Hsieh, C., and E. Moretti. 2015. Housing Constraints and Spatial Misallocation. NBER Working Paper No. 21154. http://www.nber.org/papers/w21154. Accessed 22 Nov 2018.
Taylor, R. 2017. Exit Left: Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Parijs, P. 1995. Real Freedom for All. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wellman, C. 2016. Freedom of Movement and the Right to Enter and Exit. In Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership, ed. S. Fine and L. Ypi. New York: Oxford University Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Somin, I. Foot voting versus ballot box voting: why voting with your feet is crucial to political freedom. Eur Polit Sci 18, 587–602 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0195-2
- Political freedom
- Political participation
- Voting with your feet