European integration and British membership: Still an intergovernmentalist story?
- 82 Downloads
This article compares the formation of national preferences and interstate bargains for the two historical decisions on British membership, the accession of the UK to the European Communities and British exit from the European Union. While both resemble in their procedure to overcome intra-party division by announcing a referendum about the outcome of interstate bargains, the closer inspection suggests a transformation from a socioeconomic toward ideological foundation of the national preference on British membership and from intergovernmental bargaining effectiveness toward two-level game (in)voluntary defection.
KeywordsBrexit European integration Intergovernmentalism
- Finke, D., T. König, S.O. Proksch, and G. Tsebelis. 2012. Reforming the European Union: Realizing the Impossible. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- König, T. 2018. Still the Century of Intergovernmentalism? Partisan Ideology, Two Level Bargains and Technocratic Governance in the post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- König, T., and D. Finke. 2009. Why Risk Popular Ratification Failure? A Comparative Analysis of the Choice of the Ratification Instrument in the 25 Member States of the EU. Constitutional Political Economy 20(3): 341–365.Google Scholar
- Moravcsik, A. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Power and State Purpose from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Moravcsik, A., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2009. Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In European Integration, ed. A. Wiener and T. Diez, 67–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Parker, G. 2016. Cameron Pins Brexit on EU Failure to Grant UK Brake on Migration. Financial Times. Retrieved 24 July 2016.Google Scholar
- Ross, T. 2014. David Cameron: My Seven Targets for a New EU. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 June 2016.Google Scholar