teaching experimental political science: reloaded

Abstract

Experimental methods are on the rise in Political Science, and we have a growing demand for teaching experimental methods within university courses. This article is an update on an article published in European Political Science (EPS) in 2012 titled ‘Teaching Experimental Political Science’. It presents an alternative teaching concept, where experiments are not just experienced but also designed by students. Consequently, this article argues that teaching experimental methods in Political Science should include students working on their own research projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adriaensen, J., Coremans, E., and Kerremans, B. (2014) ‘Overcoming statistics anxiety. Towards the incorporation of quantitative methods in non-methodological courses’, European Political Science 13(3): 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adriaensen, J., Kerremans, B., and Slootmaeckers, K. (2015) ‘Editors’ introduction to the thematic issue: Mad about methods? Teaching research methods in political science’, Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blair, A., Curtis, S., and McGinty, S. (2013a) ‘Is peer feedback an effective approach for creating dialogue in politics?’, European Political Science 12(1): 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M. and Shields, S. (2013b) ‘What Feedback do students want?’, Politics 33(1): 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J. and Lupia, A. (2011) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J. and Lupia, A. (2006) ‘The growth and development of experimental research in political science’, American Political Science Review 100(4): 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunning, T. (2012) Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., Marshall, S. (2009) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Enhancing Academic Practice, London: Routledge.

  9. Hamenstädt, U. (2012a) ‘Teaching experimental political science: Experiences from a seminar on methods’, European Political Science 11(1): 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamenstädt, U. (2012b) Die Logik des politikwissenschaftlichen Experiments, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holt, C. and Laury, S (1997) ‘Classroom games: Voluntary provision of a public good’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morton, R. and Williams, K. (2010) Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. From Nature to the Lab, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  13. Nikolopoulos, I. and Zettl, C. (2014) ‘Research as a teen: First-year obligatory undergraduate research programme in political science’, ECPR General Conference 2014, Glasgow.

  14. Page, E. (2015) ‘Undergraduate research: An apprenticeship approach to teaching political science methods’, European Political Science 14(3): 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryan, M., Saunders, C., Rainsford E. and Thompson E. (2013) ‘Improving research methods teaching and learning in politics and international relations: A ‘Reality Show’ approach’, Politics 34(1): 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shadish, W., Cook, T. and Campbell, D. (2002) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Touchton, M. (2015) ‘Flipping the classroom and student performance in advanced statistics. Evidence from a quasi-experiment’, Special issue: Teaching research methods in political science, Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Hamenstädt.

Additional information

Supplementary information accompanies this article on the European Political Science website (www.palgrave-journals.com/eps)

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamenstädt, U. teaching experimental political science: reloaded. Eur Polit Sci 17, 486–493 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0117-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • teaching
  • methods
  • experiments
  • course design
  • political science