Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

are area studies diversifying european political science? perspectives from germany and portugal

  • Research
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Area Studies, that is, academic work focused on a specific geographic area and its phenomena, exists in the form of study programmes, institutes and departments in many European universities and research centres. European political scientists preoccupied with theoretical abstraction have also engaged, within the frame of Area Studies, with the production of context-rich knowledge. Although Area Studies have followed distinctive and non-linear paths of development, this approach to the study of social science is present in a considerable number of academic spaces in Europe. A debate on the value of Area Studies is also active in the context of a discussion on its capacity to dismantle ethnocentrism in science. Despite the dynamism of this discussion, little has been done to explore empirically how Area Studies have contributed or not to the diversification of Political Science. This paper seeks to remedy that omission and analyse whether an Area Studies approach to the study of Political Science, in particular, European Political Science, has contributed or not to making the discipline more diverse. To address this question, the paper presents some considerations that emerge from a review of the literature and from interviews with twenty researchers working in the field of Political Science in two European countries: Germany and Portugal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basedau, M. and Köllner, P. (2006) Area Studies and Comparative Area Studies: Opportunities and Challenges for the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancela, J., Dias Coelho, T. and Ruivo, J. (2014) ‘Political research in Portugal: scientific articles in national academic journals’, European Political Science 13(4): 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, J. (2009) ‘Don’t stay home: the utility of area studies for political science scholarship’, in G. King, K. Schlozman and N. Nie (eds.) The Future of Political Science: 100 Perspectives, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. (1993) ‘Europa, Modernidad y Eurocentrismo’, in E. Lander (ed.) La Colonialidad del Saber. Eurocentrismo y Ciencias Sociales. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas, 1st ed. Buenos Aires: FLACSO, pp. 41–53.

  • Dussel, E. (1996) The Underside of Modernity: Apel, Ricoeur, Rorty, Taylor and the Philosophy of Liberation. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.

  • Hall, P. and Tarrow, S. (1998) ‘Globalization and area studies: When is too broad too narrow?’, Chronicle of Higher Education 40(20): 114–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. (2016) ‘Recherche et extraversion: éléments pour une sociologie de la science dans les pays de la périphérie’, Africa Development 15(3/4): 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E. (2003) ‘Letter from the President: The role of cross-regional comparison’, Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section in Comparative Politics 14(2): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1997) ‘Preconception versus observation, or the contributions of rational choice theory and area studies to contemporary political science’, Political Science & Politics 30(2): 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W.D. (1996) ‘Posoccidentalismo: las epistemologías fronterizas y el dilema de los estudios (latinoamericanos) de área’, Revista iberoamericana 62(176): 679–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W.D. (2002) ‘The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference’, South Atlantic Quarterly 101(1): 57–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1979) Orientalism, New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (2016) ‘Compare why and how. Comparing, miscomparing and the comparative method’, in M. Dogan and A. Kazancigil (eds.) Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 14–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüttemeyer, S. (2007) ‘The current state of political science in Germany’, in H. Klingemann (ed.) The State of Political Science in Western Europe, Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szanton, D. (ed.) (2002) The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, Berkely, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under Grant Agreement No 607133.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Political Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    monica rodriguez de luna

Authors
  1. monica rodriguez de luna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to monica rodriguez de luna.

Appendix

Appendix

INTERVIEWS AND DATES

A.:

13. 11. 2015 GIGA

B.:

19. 11. 2015 GIGA

C.:

26. 11. 2015 GIGA

D.:

08. 01. 2016 GIGA

E.:

05. 01. 2016 GIGA

F.:

13. 04. 2016 ICS-UL

G.:

07. 04. 2016 ICS-UL

H.:

05. 04. 2016 ICS-UL

I.:

11. 04. 2016 ICS-UL

J.:

21. 04. 2016 GIGA

K.:

07. 04. 2016 GIGA

L.:

12. 04. 2016 GIGA

M.:

11.04. 2016 UHH

N.:

07. 04. 2016 ICS-UL

O.:

30.04. 2016 ICS-UL

P.:

04.05. 2016 ICS-UL

Q.:

06.05. 2015 UNL

R.:

29.04.2016 UNL

S.:

14.04. 2106 UHH

T.:

02. 05. 2016 UHH

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

GIGA:

German Institute of Global and Area Studies

ICS-UL:

Institute of Social Sciences of the University of Lisbon

UHH:

University of Hamburg

UNL:

Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University Nova of Lisbon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de luna, m.r. are area studies diversifying european political science? perspectives from germany and portugal. Eur Polit Sci 15, 519–535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-016-0075-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-016-0075-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation