Abstract
Japan combines demographic challenges of decreasing childbirths and an ageing population, yet political unwillingness to use immigration to ease labour market and caregiving shortages. Paying attention to gender, diversity, and inclusion would seem to be a ‘rational’ political choice. Although Prime Minister Abe (Abe II) understands the need to appear to be responding to Japanese women qua equal citizens, women remain more an ‘object’ of LDP policy than a substantive beneficiary. To improve his image, Abe has incorporated ‘Womenomics’ into his strategy of economic revitalisation; the result has been a rather incoherent blend of ‘equal participation’ and ‘women’s utilisation’. In 2016, the dearth of diversity and anti-feminist sentiment within Japanese politics continues to be mirrored in both passive and active ways within the discursive and institutional political climate, including within academia. It is largely premature to assume a shared normative or scientific commitment to inclusion and diversity in Japan. Japanese Political Science (JPS) is no exception, and this has obvious implications for what constitutes a ‘serious’ political issue worthy of study, what gets funded, who gets hired, and the extent to which critical debates within feminist political science (FSP) on gender, race, and diversity are taken seriously. In this article, I offer a preliminary evaluation of JPS in light of three indicators: the under-representation of women in Japanese academia generally and political science specifically; the access of FPS to large-scale government funding grants (2003–2013) and its impact on the discipline; and recent efforts by feminist political scientists in Tokyo to create a ‘home’ for debates on gender, diversity, and political representation. I conclude with a hopeful expectation that increasing numbers of political scientists in Japan will begin to genuinely problematise the dearth of diversity in Japanese politics and to approach this fundamental puzzle of Japanese democratisation with the intellectual curiosity that it deserves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Act on Education in Law School and Connection with Bar Examination (2002) (Hōka daigakuin no kyōiku to shihōshikentō tono renkeitō nikansuru hōritsu), Law No. 139.
Aiden, H.S. (2011) ‘Creating the ‘Multicultural Coexistence’ Society: Central and Local Government Policies towards Foreign Residents in Japan,’ Social Science Japan Journal 14(2): 213–231.
Arichi, M. (1999) “Is it Radical? Women’s right to keep their own surnames after marriage”. Women’s Studies International Forum 22: 411–415.
Berstein, G. (1991) Recreating Japanese Women, 1600–1945, Berkeley: University of California Press.
CFHSS (2005) Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, Ivory Towers: Feminist and Equity Audits, www.fedcan.ca/english/issues/issues/ivoryaudit2001.
Celis, K. and S. Childs (2012) ‘The substantive representation of women: What to do with conservative claims?’ Political Studies 60(1): 213–225.
Childs, S. and M.L. Krook (2009) ‘Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical’ actors’, Government and Opposition 44: 125–45.
Chung, E.A. (2010) Immigration and Citizenship in Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen et al (2002–2009) Human Rights Complaint against the discriminatory nature of the Canadian Research Chair Program Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, “Marjorie Cohen, et al., and Canadian Human Rights Commission and Industry Canada,” Mediation, May 29, Ottawa. (HR complaint from 2002–2009 with settlement reached).
Dahlerup, D. (ed.) (2006) Women, Quotas and Politics, London: Routledge.
Dahlerup, D. (1988) ‘From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies 11(3): 275–276
Dale, S.P.F. (2012) ‘An introduction to X-Jendā: Examining a new gender identity in Japan,’ Intersections: Gender and Sexuality in Asia and the Pacific’ 31(December), http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue31/dale.htm
Denoon, D., M. Hudson, G. McCormack, and T. Morris-Suzuki (eds.) (2001) Multicultural Japan: Palaeolithic to Postmodern, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Domoto, A. (2013) ‘How we wrote gender perspective into Japan’s disaster legislation,’ in ed. JWNDRR, Disaster Risk Reduction: A Japanese Women’s Perspective on 3/11. Tokyo: JWNDRR.
Eto, M. (2012) ‘Making a difference in Japanese politics: Women legislators acting for gender equality’, Harvard Asian Quarterly, XIV: 1/2, 25–34.
Fujimura-Fanselow, K. (ed.) (2011) Transforming Japan: How Feminism and Diversity are Making a Difference, New York: Feminist Press
GCOE GEMC Journals (2008-2013). Tohoku University Global COE on gender equality and multicultural conviviality in the age of globalization, www.law.tohoku.ac.jp/gcoe/en/category/activity-en/pub-en/, accessed 1 February 2015.
Gelb, J. (2003) Gender Policies in Japan and the United States: Comparing Women’s Movements, Rights, Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hudson, M. (1999) Ruins of Identity: Ethnogenesis in the Japanese Islands, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Ito, R. (2005) ‘Crafting Migrant Women’s Citizenship in Japan: Taking “Family” as a Vantage Point,’ International Journal fo Japanese Sociology 14(1): 52–69.
Iwai, T. (1993) “The Madonna Boom”: Women in the Japanese Diet. Journal of Japanese Studies 19(1): 103.
Iwamoto, M. (2007) ‘Kuōta ga ronjirarenai nihonseiji no fushigi’ (The strange inability of Japanese politics to debate quotas), in S. Kawato and H. Yamamoto (eds.), Seiji Sankaku to Jendā (Political Participation and Gender), Sendai: Tohoku University Press, 177–210.
Iwamoto, M. (2001) ‘The Madonna Boom: The progress of Japanese women into politics in the 1980s’, PS: Political Science and Politics 34(2): 225–226.
JFBA. (2015) ‘Statement Calling for the Revision of the Discriminatory Provisions of the Civil Code in Response to the Ruling Rendered by the Grand Bench of the Supreme Court Regarding the Requirement for Married Couples to Adopt the Same Surname and the Remarriage Prohibition Period (Summary)’, Japan Federation of Bar Associations, www.nichibenren.or.jp/en/document/statements/year/2015/151218_2.html, accessed 1 March 2015.
JSPS. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Website, ‘21st Century COE Program,’ www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-21coe/index.html, accessed 1 February 2016.
JWNDRR. (2013) Disaster Risk Reduction: A Japanese Women’s Perspective on 3/11. Tokyo: Japan Women’s Network for Disaster Risk Reduction.
Krook, M.L. (2008) ‘Campaigns for candidate gender quotas: a new global women’s movement? in S. Grey and M. Sawer (eds.), Women’s Movements: Flourishing or in Abeyance? London: Routledge, 105–115.
Lebra, T.S. (1993) Above the Clouds: Status Culture of the Modern Japanese Nobility, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lie, J. (2001) Multiethnic Japan, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mackie, V. (2003) Feminism in Modern Japan: Citizenship, Embodiment and Sexuality, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1999) ‘Should women represent women and blacks represent blacks? A Contingent ‘Yes’’ Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–657.
Matsui, K. (1999) Womenomics, Tokyo: Goldman Sacchs.
Matsui, K. (2014) Womenomics 4.0: Time to Walk the Talk, Tokyo: Goldman Sacchs.
Maxeiner, J.R. and K. Yamanaka (2004) ‘The New Japanese law schools: Putting the professional into legal education,’ Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 13(2): 303–328.
Mikanagi, Y. (2001) “Women and political institutions in Japan,” Political Science and Politics 34(02): 211–212.
Miura, M. (ed.) (2016) Nihon no josei giin dou sureba fueru noka (What Can We do to Increase Japanese Women Parliamentarians?) Tokyo: Asahi Shinbun Shuppan.
Miura, M. (2015) Watashitachi no koe o gikai e: Daihyōsei minshushugi no saisei (Making Our Voices Heard: The Revival of Representative Democracy). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Miura, M. and M. Eto (eds.) (2014) Jendā kuōta: Sekai no josei giin wa naze fuetanoka (Gender Quotas in Comparative Perspectives), Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
Murai, S. (2015) ‘Tokyo’s Shibuya and Setagaya wards issue first same-sex partnership papers,’ The Japan Times, November 15, 2015, www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/11/05/national/social-issues/shibuya-set-issue-first-certificates-recognizing-sex-couples/#.VvCihqNxm9Y, accessed 1 January 2016.
Ogai, T. (2001) ‘Japanese women and political institutions: Why are women politically unrepresented?’ PS: Political Science and Politics 34(2): 207–211.
Ogai, T. (1996) ‘The stars of democracy: The first thirty-nine female members of the Japanese Diet’, U.S. Japan Women’s Journal, English Supplement (11): 81–117.
Okano, Yayo (2016) ‘Why has the ethics of care become an issue of global concern? Special issue: Being migrants, being caregivers: Globalization and Its implication, International Journal of Japanese Sociology 25(1):85–99.
Okano, Y. (2012) Feminizumu no Seijigaku – Kea no Ronri o Gurobaru Shakai e, (The Politics of Feminism: Introducing the Ethics of Care to the Global Society), Tokyo: Misuzu Shobo.
Osaki, T. (2015) ‘Japan’s top court upholds same-name rule for married couples, overturns remarriage moratorium for women,’ The Japan Times, www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/12/16/national/crime-legal/japans-top-court-strikes-rules-divorcee-remarriage/#.VvCt3_l95hE, accessed 15 January 2016.
Osawa, K. (2015) ‘Traditional Gender Norms and Women’s Political Participation: How Conservative Women Engage in Political Activism in Japan,’ Social Science Japan Journal 18(1): 45–61.
Osawa M., A. Domoto, and K. Yamaji (eds.) (2011) ‘Disaster, Reconstruction and Gender Equality – June 11th Symposium’, Conference Proceedings, Global COE Tokyo Branch Research Series No. 4/Institute of Social Science Research Series No. 46.
Osawa, M. (2013) Social Security in Contemporary Japan. London: Routledge.
QnoKai. (Association for Promoting Quotas). (2016). ‘Kinkyū hōkoku-sho shūkai kekka gaiyō’ (Emergency report-back meeting on parliament), 6 June 2016, Tokyo: Association for Promoting Quotas.
Phillips, A. (1995) The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Robertson, J. (1998), Takarazuka: Sexual Politics and Popular Culture in Modern Japan, University of Berkeley: California Press.
Sakamoto, T. (1999) Explaining Electoral Reform: Japan versus Italy and New Zealand. Party Politics 5(4): 419–438
SCJ, Science Council of Japan. (2002) ‘Yobosho – Josei kagakusha no kankyo kaizen no gutaiteki sochi ni tsuite (Petition – Regarding concrete measures to improve the working environment of women researchers),’ Science Council of Japan, Tokyo.
Shin, K. (2004) ‘Fufubessei movement in Japan: Thinking about women’s movement and subjectivity, Frontiers of Gender Studies 2:107–114.
Stannard, U. (1984) “Manners Make Laws: Married Women’s Names in the United States”. Names 32: 114–128.
Steele, J.F. (2007) “Electoral Opportunities under a Parallel (Mixed) System: Views of Women Elected to the Japanese House of Representatives”, in Miyoko Tsujimura and Emi Yano (eds.), Gender Equality in Japan, Tohoku University Press, 119–146.
Steele, J.F. (2008) ‘Republican Liberty, Naming Laws, and the Role of Patronymy in Constituting Women’s Citizenship in Canada and Québec’, in Y. Abu-Laban (ed.), Gendering the Nation-State: Canadian and Comparative Perspectives, Vancouver: UBC Press, 220–238.
Steele, J.F. (2011) ‘Women’s representation in the Japanese lower house: ‘Temporary’ measures and the windows of opportunity in a mixed electoral system, in (eds.) M. Tsujimura and J.F. Steele, Gender Equality in Asia: Policies and Political Representation, Sendai: Tohoku University Press, 197–226.
Steele, J.F. (2013) “Le Japon est-il une démocratie multinationale? Portrait de la diversité multinationale et intranationale au Japon: approches théoriques et pratiques, Diversité urbaine 13(1): 85–110.
Steele, J.F. (2014) “Tay na seijiteki aidentiti to kutasei no hirogari: nihon no jirei kara” (Diverse political identities and the potential of quotas: The Japanese electoral system in perspective), in M. Miura and M. Eto (eds.), Gender Quotas in Comparative Perspectives, Tokyo: Akashi Shoten, 41–66.
Steele, J.F. (2015) ‘Feminist Representation as Critical Advocacy and Contestatory Agonism: The Law Reform Activism of Domoto Akiko and the Japan Women’s Network for Disaster Risk Reduction,’ European Consortium for Politics and Gender Conference, Uppsala, 11–13 June 2015.
Steele, J.F. and M. Osawa (2013) ‘Gender, diversity and tohoku reconstruction: Governance challenges and opportunities two years on,’ GCOE Program ‘Gender Equality and Multicultural Conviviality in the Age of Globalization’ Institute of Social Science Branch, Research Series No. 6/ISS Research Series No. 53.
Steele Interviews (2014–2016) ‘Research Project on the Political Advocacy and Law Reform Impact of JWNDRR,’ Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo.
Squires, J. (1999) Gender in Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Takezawa, Y. (2008) “'Tabunka Kyosei’ and Community-Rebuilding After the Kobe Earthquake”, in Graburn et al. (eds.), Multiculturalism in New Japan: Crossing the Boundaries within Japan, New York: Bergham Books, 32–42.
Taniguchi, M. (2006) ‘The State of Political Science in Japan,’ IPSA 2006 (Fukuoka, Japan) Conference Paper, http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_4049.pdf, accessed 8 December 2015.
Trimble, L. (2008) “Assembling Women, Gendering Assemblies”, in Yasmeen Abu-Laban (ed.), Gendering the Nation-State, Vancouver: UBC Press, 79–96.
Tsuda, T. (1999) ‘The Permanence of ‘ Temporary’ Migration: the structural embeddedness of Japanese-Brazilian Immigrant Workers in Japan,’ Journal of Asian Studies 58(3): 687–722.
Tsujimura, M. (2001) ‘Women’s rights in law and praxis: the significance of three statistics from politics, the household, and labor’, in Y. Higuchi (ed.), Five Decades of Constitutionalism in Japanese Society’, Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Tsujimura, M. (2005) ‘Gakujutsu bunya ni okeru danjo kyōdō sankaku seisaku no kadai (Issues concerning gender equality policies within academia), in M. Tsujimura and Inaba (eds.), Nihon no danjo kyōdō sankaku seisaku: kuni to chihō kōkyō dantai no genjō to kadai (Gender Equality Policies in Japan: The Situation and Issues for National and Regional Public Bodies), Sendai: Tohoku University Press, 97-126.
Tsujimura, M. and J.F. Steele (2011) Gender Equality in Asia: Policies and Political Participation, Sendai: Tohoku University Press.
Ueno, C. (2004) Nationalism and Gender, translated by Beverley Yamamoto, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Ueno, C. (2014) ‘Abe Seiken no Josei Chisaku wa Kanchigai Bakari: Josei ni Furi na Hatarakikata no Rūru wo Henkō Seyo’ (The Misguidedness of the Abe Government’s Women Policies: Change the Working Rules that Disadvantage Women), Jyānarizumu (Journalism) (12) 295: 6–14
Ueno, C. et al (eds.) (2006) Bakkurashu! Naze jendā furi wa tatakareta no ka? (Backlash! Why ‘Gender Free’ was Attacked), Tokyo: Sōfūsha.
Ueno, C. et al (2014). Bakkurasshu! Naze jenda furii wa tatakareta noka (Backlash! Why was ‘gender free’ under attack?). Tokyo: Sōfusha.
UNISDR (2015) ‘Japan: Women’s umbrella coalition wins key disaster risk reduction reforms, works for a gender-equal HFA2’, in UNISDR (ed.), Women’s Leadership in Risk Resilient Development: Best Practices and Lessons Learned, UNISDR, 46–47.
Vickers, J. (2015) ‘Can We Change How Political Science Thinks? Gender Mainstreaming in a Resistant Discipline’ (2015 Presidential Address), Canadian Journal of Political Science 48:
Watanabe, H. (2003) ‘Sei’ to Seiji (‘‘Sex’ and Politics’) Nenpo Seijigaku (The Annuals of Japanese Political Science), Volume 54.
Weiner, M. (1997) Japan’s Minorities: The illusion of homogeneity (Sheffield Centre for Japanese Studies/Routledge Series).
Yamaguchi, T. (2014) ‘‘Gender Free’ Feminism in Japan: A story of mainstreaming and backlash,’ Feminist Studies 40(3): 541–572.
Yamanaka, K. (2011) ‘Increasing gaps between immigration policies and outcomes in Japan: The responsibility of researchers in international migration studies,’ Social Science Japan Journal 14(2): 427–252.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to acknowledge the constructive evaluations from two Anonymous reviewers at ECP. I also wish to thank Gregory W. Noble for his insightful editorial feedback. Finally, my appreciation goes to Daniel Stockemer for his invitation and leadership of this Special Issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steele, J.F. Japanese political science at a crossroads? normative and empirical preconditions for the integration of women and diversity into political science. Eur Polit Sci 15, 536–555 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-016-0074-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-016-0074-7