Service robots in hospitals: new perspectives on niche evolution and technology affordances
- 476 Downloads
Changing demands in society and the limited capabilities of health systems have paved the way for robots to move out of industrial contexts and enter more human-centered environments such as health care. We explore the shared beliefs and concerns of health workers on the introduction of autonomously operating service robots in hospitals or professional care facilities. By means of Q-methodology, a mixed research approach specifically designed for studying subjective thought patterns, we identify five potential end-user niches, each of which perceives different affordances and outcomes from using service robots in their working environment. Our findings allow for better understanding resistance and susceptibility of different users in a hospital and encourage managerial awareness of varying demands, needs, and surrounding conditions that a service robot must contend with. We also discuss general insights into presenting the Q-methodology results and how an affordance-based view could inform the adoption, appropriation, and adaptation of emerging technologies.
Keywordshealth information technology IT affordance materiality mixed methods niche evolution Q-methodology service robots
The authors wish to thank the editors and reviewers of this paper for their insightful comments that have greatly improved its content and presentation. They also want to extend their gratitude to the Swiss Academy of Engineering Sciences and the Swiss Informatics Society for their financial support.
- Ahn HS, Kuo I-H, Datta C, Stafford R, Kerse N, Peri K, Broadbent E and Macdonald BA (2014) Design of a kiosk type healthcare robot system for older people in private and public places. In Simulation, modeling, and programming for autonomous robots (Brugali D, Broenink JF, Kroeger T and Macdonald BA, Eds), pp 578–589, Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
- Al-Natour S and Benbasat I (2009) The adoption and use of IT artifacts: a new interaction-centric model for the study of user-artifact relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10(9), 661–685.Google Scholar
- Alves-Oliveira P, Petisca S, Correia F, Maia N and Paiva A (2015) Social robots for older adults: framework of activities for aging in place with robots. In Social robotics (Tapus A, André E, Martin J-C, Ferland F and Ammi M, Eds), pp 11–20, Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
- Barentsen K and Trettvik J (2002) An activitiy theory approach to affordance. Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Aarhus, Denmark, pp 51–60.Google Scholar
- Bepko JR RJ, Moore JR and Coleman JR (2009) Implementation of a pharmacy automation system (robotics) to ensure medication safety at Norwalk hospital. Quality Management in Healthcare 18(2), 103–114.Google Scholar
- Bertelsen OW (2006) Tertiary artifacts at the interface. In Aesthetic computing (Fishwick PA, Ed), pp 357–368, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Best ML, Smyth TN, Etherton J and Wornyo E (2010) Uses of mobile phones in post-conflict Liberia. Information Technologies and International Development 6(2), 91–108.Google Scholar
- Bouchard T (1976) Field research methods: interviewing, questionnaires, participant observation, systematic observation, unobtrusive measures. In Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology (Dunnette M, Ed), pp 363–413, Rand NcNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Brown SR (1993) A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 16(3/4), 91–138.Google Scholar
- Cepolina FE and Muscolo GG (2014) Design of a robot for hygienization of walls in hospital environments. Proceedings of the 41st International Symposium on Robotics, Munich, Germany, pp 1–7.Google Scholar
- Chamero A (2011) Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Costall A (1997) The meaning of things. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 41(1), 76–85.Google Scholar
- Davern M, Shaft T and Te’eni D (2012) Cognition matters: enduring questions in cognitive is research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13(4), 273–314.Google Scholar
- Dennis KE (1988) Q-methodology: new perspectives on estimating reliability and validity. In Measurement of nursing outcomes (Strickland OL and Waltz CF, Eds), pp 409–419, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
- Diprose JP, Plimmer B, Macdonald BA and Hosking JG (2012) How people naturally describe robot behaviour. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
- Faraj S. and Azad B (2012) The materiality of technology: an affordance perspective. In Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Leonardi PM, Nardi BA and Kallinikos J, Eds), pp 237–258, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Forbes (2014) Top 20 technologies that will change our lives: next up – Digital medicine. http://www.forbes.com/sites/reenitadas/2014/07/14/top-20-technologies-that-will-change-our-lives-next-up-digital-medicine/#8ef5bcef2c9f.
- Garmann-Johnsen NF, Mettler T and Sprenger M (2014) Service robotics in healthcare: A perspective for information systems researchers? In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems, Auckland, New Zealand, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
- Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
- Hafermalz E, Hovorka DS and Riemer K (2015) Shared secret places: social media and affordances. Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide, Australia, pp 1–11.Google Scholar
- Hedberg A and Morosi M (2015) Keeping health high on the eu agenda: Role for economic governance?, European Policy Centre, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
- Idc (2015) Annual IT spending by western european healthcare providers to reach $14.6 billion by 2018. IDC, London.Google Scholar
- International Federation of Robotics (2016) Definition of service robots. http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/.
- International Standardization Organization (2016) Robots and robotic devices – vocabulary. http://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:8373:ed-2:v1:en:term:2.10.
- Joint Institute for Innovation Policy of the European Commission (2012) Investigating in research and innovation for grand challenges. https://ec.europa.eu/research/erab/pdf/erab-study-grand-challanages-2012_en.pdf.
- Kane GC, Fichman RG, Gallaugher J and Glaser J (2009) Community relations 2.0. Harvard Business Review, 87 (11), 45–50.Google Scholar
- Kim H-W and Kankanhalli A (2009) Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly 33(3), 567–582.Google Scholar
- Kuo IH, Rabindran JM, Broadbent Y, Lee YI, Kerse N, Stafford RMQ and Macdonald BA (2009) Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, pp 214–219.Google Scholar
- Lanamäki A, Thapa D and Stendal K (2016) When is an affordance? Outlining four stances. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference on Information Systems and Organizations, Dublin, Ireland, pp 125–139.Google Scholar
- Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 147–176.Google Scholar
- Li R, Wang S, Deng H, Wang R and Chang KC (2012) Towards social user profiling: unified and discriminative influence model for inferring home locations. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Bejing, China, pp 1023–1031.Google Scholar
- Ljungblad S, Kotrbova J, Jacobsson M, Cramer H and Niechwiadowicz K (2012) Hospital robot at work: something alien or an intelligent colleague? Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, pp 177–186.Google Scholar
- Magnani L (2008) Chances, affordances, niche construction. In Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems (Lovrek I, Howlett RJ and Jain LC, Eds), pp 719–726, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Majchrzak A and Markus ML (2012) Technology affordances and constraints in management information systems. In Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Kessler E, Ed.), pp 832–836, Sage, London.Google Scholar
- Mesgari M and Okoli C (2015) Ecological approach to user sensemaking of technology. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, TX, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
- Norman DA (1990) The design of everyday things. Doubleday, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- O’leary K, Wobbrock JO and Riskin EA (2013) Q-methodology as a research and design tool for hci. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, pp 1941–1950.Google Scholar
- Odling-Smee JJ (1988) The role of behavior in evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Oudshoorn N and Pinch T (2003) How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology (inside technology). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Ozkil AG, Fan Z, Dawids S, Aanes H, Kristensen JK and Christensen KH (2009) Service robots for hospitals: a case study of transportation tasks in a hospital. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Shenyang, China, pp 289–294.Google Scholar
- Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Poulston A, Stevenson M and Bontcheva K (2016) User profiling with geo-located posts and demographic data. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science, Austin, TX, pp 43–48.Google Scholar
- Pozzi G, Pigni F and Vitari C (2014) Affordance theory in the is discipline: a review and synthesis of the literature. Proceedings of the Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, GA, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
- Sergeeva A, Huysman M and Faraj S (2015) Transforming work practices of operating room teams: the case of the Da Vinci robot. Proceedings of the 36th Interational Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, USA, pp 1–10.Google Scholar
- Stainton Rogers R (1995) Q methodology. In Rethinking methods in psychology (smith JA, Harré R and Van Langenhove L, Eds), Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
- Stephenson W (1986) Protoconcursus: the concourse theory of communication: I. Operant Subjectivity 9(2), 37–58.Google Scholar
- Strauss AL and Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
- Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2016) Hospital statistics. Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Takayama L, Ju W and Nass C (2008) Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 25–32.Google Scholar
- Teddlie C and Yu F (2007) Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
- The Economist (2014) New roles for technology: rise of the robots. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21599762-prepare-robot-invasion-it-will-change-way-people-think-about-technology-rise.
- The Wall Street Journal (2012) The robots are coming to hospitals. http://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304459804577281350525870934.
- Thompson G (1966) The evaluation of public opinion. In Reader in public opinion and communication (Berelson B and Janowitz M, Eds), pp 7–12, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Treem JW and Leonardi PM (2013) Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In Communication yearbook (SALMON CT, Ed), pp 143–189, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
- Tsui KM, Desai M, Yanco HA and Uhlik C (2011) Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 11–18, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Van Exel J and De Graaf G (2005) Q methodology: a sneak preview. http://qmethod.org/articles/vanExel.pdf.
- Volkoff O and Strong DM (2013) Critical realism and affordances: theorizing it-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly 37(3), 819–834.Google Scholar
- Wingreen SC, Lerouge C and Blanton JE (2009) Structuring training for it professionals and the firm: an application of the q-methodology. International Journal of Global Management Studies 1(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
- Yoo Y, Lyytinen KJ, Boland RJ and Berente N (2010) The next wave of digital innovation: opportunities and challenges. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622170.