Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relation Between Bitcoin and Its Forks: An Empirical Investigation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies are generating increasing interest with concerns about various economic and financial implications. Investors in cryptocurrencies are affected by the massive jumps and crashes in the market and it is of interest to portfolio managers to answer the following question: Does investing in Bitcoin and its forks offer diversification for investors? This paper aims to answer this question by examining the relationship between the returns of Bitcoin and the returns of its forks and their associated volatilities. Our sample covers the period between 2010 and 2017 and includes Bitcoin and the portfolio of its forks. Our results, based on Dynamic GARCH model, indicate that there is a positive relation between the returns of Bitcoin and the returns of its forks. In addition, the results also show a positive relation between the volatility of Bitcoin and its forks. Finally, we found both the news effect and memory effect are significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/

  2. https://coin.dance/stats.

References

  • Alvarez-Ramirez, J., E. Rodriguez, and C. Ibarra-Valdez. 2018. Long-range correlations and asymmetry in the bitcoin market. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 492: 948–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcilar, Mehmet, Elie Bouri, Rangan Gupta, and David Roubaud. 2017. Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach. Economic Modelling 64: 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bariviera, A.F., M.J. Basgall, W. Hasperué, and M. Naiouf. 2017. Some stylized facts of the bitcoin market. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 484: 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouoiyour, Jamal, and Refk Selmi. 2015. What does Bitcoin look like? Annals of Economics and Finance 16: 449–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouoiyour, J., and R. Selmi. 2016. Bitcoin: A beginning of a new phase? Economics Bulletin 36: 1430–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouri, E., P. Molnár, G. Azzi, D. Roubaud, and L.I. Hagfors. 2017. On the hedge and safe haven properties of bitcoin: is it really more than a diversifier? Finance Research Letters 20: 192–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouri, E., A. Georges., and A.H. Dyhrberg. 2016. On the return-volatility relationship in the bitcoin market around the price crash of 2013. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2869855.

  • Brière, M., K. Oosterlinck, and A. Szafarz. 2015. Virtual currency, tangible return: Portfolio diversification with bitcoin. Journal of Asset Management 16: 365–373.

  • Ciaian, P., M. Rajcaniova, and A. Kancs. 2016. The economics of bitcoin price formation. Applied Economics 48(19): 1799–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, A., E. Roca, and J.-J. Su. 2015. Crypto-currency bubbles: An application of the Phillips–Shi–Yu (2013) methodology on Mt. Gox Bitcoin Prices. Applied Economics 47: 2348–2358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, S., A. Meegan, C. Larkin, B. Lucey, and L. Yarovaya. 2018. Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters 165: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. 2014. The curious case of Bitcoin: Is Bitcoin volatility driven by online research? PhD thesis, University of Victoria.

  • Dimitrova, D. 2005. The relationship between exchange rates and stock prices: Studied in a multivariate model. Issues in Political Economy 14: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyhrberg, A.H. 2016. Hedging capabilities of bitcoin. Is it the virtual gold? Finance Research Letters 16: 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, D., C.J. Tessone, P. Mavrodiev, and N. Perony, 2014. The digital traces of bubbles: Feedback cycles between socio-economics signals in the Bitcoin economy. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 11: 1–28.

  • Georgoula, I., D. Pournarakis, C. Bilanakos, D. Sotiropoulos, and G.M. Giaglis. 2015. Using time-series and sentiment analysis to detect the determinants of bitcoin prices. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2607167. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.

  • Gomber, P., R.J. Kauffman, C. Parker, and B.W. Weber. 2018. On the Fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems 35(1): 220–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronwald, M. 2014. The economics of Bitcoins: Market characteristics and price jumps. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5121.

  • Hayes, A.S. 2015. Cryptocurrency value formation: An empirical study leading to a cost of production model for valuing bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics 34(7): 1308–1321.

  • Hong, K. 2017. Bitcoin as an alternative investment vehicle. Information Technology and Management 18(4): 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsiampa, P. 2017. Volatility estimation for bitcoin: a comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters 158: 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjærland, F., K. Aras, A.K. Erlend, B.G.N. Frans, and O. Are. 2018. An analysis of bitcoin’s price dynamics. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 11(4): 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristoufek, L. 2015. What are the main drivers of the bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123923.

  • Li, X., and C.A. Wang. 2017. The technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: The case of bitcoin. Decision Support Systems 95: 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapuric, Svetlana, and Angelika Kokkinaki. 2014. Bitcoin is volatile! Isn’t that right? In Business Information Systems Workshops,255–265. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polasik, M., A. Piotrowska, W. Iwona, P. Tomasz, R. Kotkowski, and G. Lightfoot. 2015. Price fluctuations and the use of bitcoin: An empirical inquiry. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 20(1): 9–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, P., S. Vassiliadis, M. Rangoussi, T. Konieczny, and J. Gralewski. 2017. Bitcoin value analysis based on cross-correlations. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. 22(S7): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillip, A., J. Chan, and S. Peiris. 2018. A new look at cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters 163: 6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, A. 2017. Price clustering in bitcoin. Economics Letters 159: 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., and A. Tsyvinski. 2021. Risks and returns of cryptocurrency. The Review of Financial Studies 34(6): 2689–2727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassilladis, S., P. Papadopoulos, M. Ranquoussi, and T. Konieczny. 2017. Bitcoin value analysis based on cross-correlations. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce 22(S7): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk, D. 2013. What can be expected from the bitcoin. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

  • Yermack, D. 2013. Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An economic appraisal. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series 19747.

  • Zwick, H.S., and S.A.S. Syed. 2019. Bitcoin and gold prices: A fledging long-term relationship. MPRA Paper 92512. Germany: University Library of Munich.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of National Planning and American University of Beirut, Cairo, Egypt

    Neveen Ahmed

  2. ADA University, Baku, Azerbaijan

    Omar Farooq

  3. American University of Cairo, Cairo, Egypt

    Nidaa Hamed

Authors
  1. Neveen Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omar Farooq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nidaa Hamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neveen Ahmed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, N., Farooq, O. & Hamed, N. Relation Between Bitcoin and Its Forks: An Empirical Investigation. Eastern Econ J 49, 249–261 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-023-00247-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-023-00247-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation