Vision Zero: Speed Limit Reduction and Traffic Injury Prevention in New York City


We examine the effect on the incidence of casualties and crashes of a city-wide vehicle speed limit reduction in New York City (NYC) streets. The law change, part of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s Vision Zero Action Plan to improve traffic safety, cuts the default speed limit for streets with no speed limit signs from 30 to 25 mph beginning November 7, 2014. We use a monthly panel dataset with crash statistics for the entire population of NYC streets, from July 2012 through March 2019. Several difference-in-differences regressions show a statistically significant and meaningful decline in injuries and crashes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. 1.

    Tingvall and Haworth articulate that crashes with lesser (not long-term disabling) injuries or no injuries are beyond the scope of Vision Zero—reducing those types of crashes is not a goal of the approach. However, in practice, it is plausible that changes in speed made to reduce the severity of injuries from crashes may also reduce the total number of crashes and the number of lesser- or no-injury crashes.

  2. 2.

    As described in Belin (2016), “‘System designer’ is a diffuse concept but it refers to any of the public and private agencies responsible for the design and operation of various parts of a transportation system, including roads, vehicles, and public transit services, and those responsible for any support systems, such as laws and regulations, education and public awareness, surveillance, rescue, and care and rehabilitation. State and municipal road-maintenance authorities, vehicle manufacturers, driver education programs and schools, private transportation companies, and healthcare providers are among the other stakeholders included in the definition of system designer.”

  3. 3.

    The previous NYC mayor, Michael Bloomberg had implemented programs and street design changes to increase safety and improve conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists (NYC-DOT 2013).

  4. 4.

    The Vision Zero Network is a national nonprofit advocating for Vision Zero programs. Its criteria for designating cities as Vision Zero are: “(1) sets clear goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries, (2) Mayor has publicly, officially committed to Vision Zero, (3) Vision Zero plan or strategy is in place, or Mayor has committed to doing so in clear time frame, and (4) key city departments (including Police, Transportation, and Public Health) are engaged.” (Vision Zero Network 2019).

  5. 5.

    The program broadly referred to as Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) has been promulgated by 30 US states since 2001. Munnich et al. (2012) find that the four longest-standing programs, in Idaho, Minnesota, Utah and Washington, have been effective in reducing traffic fatalities. They note, “Successful TZD programs have five characteristics: (1) an ambitious goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries; (2) high levels of inter-agency cooperation in pursuit of the TZD goal among state departments of transportation, public safety, health, and other relevant agencies; (3) a comprehensive strategy addressing all 4 E’s—engineering, enforcement, education, and EMS (emergency medical services) elements of traffic safety; (4) a performance-based, data-driven system of targeting resources and strategies where they will have the greatest impact in reducing traffic fatalities; and (5) policy leadership from relevant entities, including the Governor, the state legislature, and the heads of state agencies.”

  6. 6.

    As one would expect, in low- and middle-income countries, weak legislation and enforcement, and lack of resources are often major impediments to improvements in traffic safety (Peden et al. 2004).

  7. 7.

    The studies are: Hoareau and Newstead (2004) (Western Australia—state-wide—December 2001); Hoareau et al. (2006) (Victoria—state-wide—January 2001); Hoareau et al. (2002) (South East Queensland—March 1999); Kloeden et al. (2006) (Southwestern Australia—March 2003).

  8. 8.

    A speed limit reduction from 37 to 31 mph in urban areas of New South Wales differed from this study, and the other Australian studies in that participation by local governments was voluntary and reduced speed limits were denoted with extensive signage; crashes and speeds were reduced (New South Wales Road Traffic Authority (NSW RTA) 2000, as cited in Hoareau et al. 2006).

  9. 9.

    Three additional academic studies are similar to the current investigation in examining the effect on casualty crashes of speed limit changes in urban areas. In Oslo, Norway, Elvik (2013) found a temporary reduction from 50 to 37.5 mph on arterial roads reduced casualty crashes by 25–35%. In Hong Kong, Wong et al. (2005) found speed limit increases of 31–43 mph and 44–50 mph increased casualty crashes by 1–36%. In London, England, Grundy et al. (2009) found a 42% reduction in casualty crashes where 20 mph zones were implemented. These studies differ from ours in being implemented at selected sites with signage changes. In addition, the first two studies considered urban highways (NYC’s highways were not affected by the NYC speed limit reduction), and the London study considered “zones” where speed limit reduction is accompanied by substantial traffic-calming engineering interventions.

  10. 10.

    The NYPD Motor Vehicles Collision Data compiles information from Police Accident Reports (form MV104-AN) filled out by an officer at the crash scene. Officers are required to report on all crashes where fatalities or injuries of any level of severity occur. If a crash victim has suffered multiple injuries, only the most severe injury is listed in the report. Officers assess injuries either by observation (for example, if the victim is unconscious) or from information reported by the crash victim (for example, if there is no visible injury but the victim reports pain or nausea). (NYS-DMV no date, pages 1 and 26). Therefore, in this paper “casualty” refers to a fatality or any injury observed by, or reported by the victim to, the officer at the crash scene.

  11. 11.

    Speed limits remained constant throughout the study period on the control streets. The control streets include larger streets, such as limited access highways or major arterial streets, with posted speed limits of 30 mph and above; and some smaller streets, such as those near schools, which are signed for speeds less than 25 mph. (NYC Vision Zero 25-MPH-faq 2014). The majority of NYC streets are unsigned (see Table 2); this is the treatment group. The statutory speed limit on these streets was 30 mph prior to November 7, 2014, and 25 mph thereafter.

  12. 12.

    Polling results in the 1-year report indicate that in October 2014 prior to the law change, 30% of New York drivers accurately identified the default 30 mph speed limit. The city conducted “25 MPH Outreach” in the fall of 2014, with street-team in-person distribution and mailings of publicity materials, social media postings and radio ads. In December 2014, 62% of New York drivers correctly identified the new 25 mph speed limit (NYC-MOO 2015, p. 46). Campaigns are ongoing regarding the 25 mph speed limit and its safety benefits (NYC-MOO 2019, p. 18, 68).

  13. 13.

    We perform the same exercises for Fixed-Effect Negative Binomial estimation, and a pooled Zero-Inflated Poisson estimation (since one cannot use fixed effects in ZIP without manually enforcing them), see Weber (2014) for more details. The results remain similar in significance and direction.

  14. 14.

    This 38.7% is calculated by: (− 0.174/0.45)*100, where 0.45 is the average number of casualties on treated streets (Table 2, row 1, column 1).

  15. 15.

    This 35.8% is calculated by: (− 0.648/1.81)*100, where 1.8 is the average number of crashes (Table 2, row 4. column 1).

  16. 16.

    This 27% is calculated by: (− 0.174/− 0.648)*100.

  17. 17.

    We omit the decomposition into different types of victims here for brevity, since we show the aggregated totals, but these estimates with leads are available upon request.

  18. 18.

    In addition to implicitly capturing the announcement effect in the leads, we tried to isolate it exclusively. Creating a separate difference-in-differences for the announcement on October 2014 in the eight estimations from Tables 3 and 4 does not meaningfully change the coefficients on our primary D-I-D, the speed limit change. Furthermore, in the eight specifications tested, the D-I-D for the announcement effect was insignificant in all specifications except for the count of crashes, where it was significantly negative. These results are available upon request.

  19. 19.

    NYC-DOT (2019) discusses city-wide congestion and low travel speeds, particularly in Manhattan.

  20. 20.

    Earlier studies of highway traffic sometimes found little effect of speed limit reductions on mean travel speeds (e.g., Parker 1997).


  1. Archer, Jeffrey, Nicola Fotheringham, Mark Symmons, and Bruce Corben. 2008. The Impact of Lowered Speed Limits in Urban and Metropolitan Areas Report 276: Monash University Accident Research Centre. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  2. Belin, Matts-Ake. 2016. “Responsibility of System Designers.” Vision Zero Cities: International Journal of Traffic Safety Innovation (1): 35-37. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  3. Bornioli, Anna, Isabelle Bray, Paul Pilkington, and Emma Bird. 2018. The Effectiveness of a 20 mph Speed Limit Intervention on Vehicle Speeds in Bristol, UK: A Non-Randomised Stepped Wedge Design. Journal of Transport & Health 11: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnell, Eric, Scott Hines, Kevin Mahoney, Richard Porter, and Hugh McGee. 2009. Speed Concepts: Informational Guide. Report FHWA-SA-10-001. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, FHWA. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  5. Elvik, Rune, Peter Christensen, and Astrid Amundsen. 2004. Speed and Road Accidents: an Evaluation of the Power Model. Report 740/2004. Oslo, Norway: TOI Report Institute of Transport Economics. landing page:;pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  6. Elvik, Rune. 2005. Speed and Road Safety: Synthesis of Evidence from Evaluation Studies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1908: 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elvik, Rune. 2013. A Before-After Study of the Effects on Safety of Environmental Speed Limits in the City of Oslo, Norway. Safety Science 55: 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elvik, Rune. 2016. Association Between Increase in Fixed Penalties and Road Safety Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 92: 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Finch, D.J., P. Kompfner, C.R. Lockwood, and G. Maycock. 1994. Speed, Speed Limits and Accidents Report PR 58. Crowthorne, UK: Department of Transportation, Transport Research Laboratory. landing page: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  10. Flegenheimer, Matt. 2014. “De Blasio Looks Toward Sweden for Road Safety.” The New York Times, May 12, 2014. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  11. Foster, Edward. 2010. The Pecuniary Value of Commuting Time. Eastern Economic Journal 36 (3): 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fowles, Richard, and Peter Loeb. 1989. Speeding, Coordination, and the 55-MPH Limit: Comment. The American Economic Review 79 (4): 916–921.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodwin, Arthur, Libby Thomas, Bevan Kirley, William Hall, Natalie O’Brien, and Kate Hill. 2015. Countermeasures that Work: A Highway Safety Countermeasure Guide for State Highway Safety Offices: 2015. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  14. Grundy, Chris, Rebecca Steinbach, Phil Edwards, Judith Green, Ben Armstrong, and Paul Wilkinson. 2009. Effect of 20 mph Traffic Speed Zones on Road Injuries in London, 1986–2006: Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis. British Medical Journal.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hauer, Ezra. 2010. Toward Zero Deaths: A National Strategy on Highway Safety: Lessons Learned from Other Countries Report No. 9: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety. pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  16. Hoareau, Effie, Stuart Newstead, Penny Oxley, and Max Cameron. 2002. An Evaluation of the Default 50 km/h Speed Limit in South East Queensland Report 264: Monash University Accident Research Centre. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  17. Hoareau, Effie, and Stuart Newstead. 2004. An Evaluation of the Default 50 km/h Speed Limits in Western Australia Report 230: Monash University Accident Research Centre. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  18. Hoareau, Effie, Stuart Newstead, and Max Cameron. 2006. An Evaluation of the Default 50 km/h Speed Limit in Victoria: Monash University Accident Research Centre. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  19. Islam, Md Tazul, Karim El-Basyouny, and Shewkar Ibrahim. 2014. The Impact of Lowered Residential Speed Limits on Vehicle Speed Behavior. Safety Science 62: 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kloeden, Craig, Jeremy Woolley, and A. Jaclyn McLean. 2006. Further Evaluation of the South Australian Default 50 km/h Speed Limit Report CASR034. Adelaide, South Australia: Centre for Automotive Safety Research, University of Adelaide. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  21. Larsson, Peter, Sidney Dekker, and Claes Tingvall. 2010. The Need for a Systems Theory Approach to Road Safety. Safety Science 48(9): 1167–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luca, Dara Lee. 2015. Do Traffic Tickets Reduce Motor Vehicle Accidents? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34(1): 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McGeehan, Patrick. 2014. “New York City Council Passes a Bill Lowering Speed Limit on most Streets.” The New York Times, October 7th, 2014. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  24. Montag, Josef. 2014. A Radical Change in Traffic Law: Effects on Fatalities in the Czech Republic. Journal of Public Health 36 (4): 539–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Munnich Jr., Lee, Frank Douma, Xiao Qin, J. David Thorpe, and Kai Wang. 2012. Evaluating the Effectiveness of State Toward Zero Deaths Programs Report CTS 12-39T: Center for Excellence in Rural Safety, University of Minnesota. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  26. Nagler, Matthew. 2013. Playing Well with Others: The Role of Social Capital in Traffic Accident Prevention. Eastern Economic Journal 39(2): 172–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. National Transportation Safety Board. 2017. Reducing Speeding-Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles. Report Safety Study NTSB/SS-17/01. Washington, D.C.: National Transportation Safety Board. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  28. New York City. 2014. Vision Zero Action Plan. New York: New York City. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  29. New York City Department of Transportation. 2013. Sustainable Streets: 2013 and Beyond: New York City Department of Transportation. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  30. New York City Department of Transportation. 2019. New York City Mobility Report. New York: NYC Department of Transportation. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  31. New York City Mayor’s Office of Operations. 2015. Vision Zero One Year Report. New York: New York City Mayor’s Office of Operations. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  32. New York City Mayor’s Office of Operations. 2018. Vision Zero Year Four Report. New York: New York City Mayor’s Office of Operations. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  33. New York City Mayor’s Office of Operations. 2019. Vision Zero Year Five Report. New York: New York City Mayor’s Office of Operations. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  34. New York City Vision Zero. No date. “Speed Limit 25 FAQ’s.” New York City. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  35. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. No date. Police Crash Report Submission Instructions Form P-33 Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  36. Noland, Robert. 2013. From Theory to Practice in Road Safety Policy: Understanding Risk Versus Mobility. Research in Transportation Economics 43(1): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. International Transport Forum. 2008. Towards Zero: Ambitious Road Safety Targets and the Safe System Approach: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; International Transport Forum.

  38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. 2006. Speed Management.

  39. Parker, Martin. 1997. Effects of Raising and Lowering Speed Limits on Selected Roadway Sections Report FHWA-RD-97-084: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  40. Peden, Margie, Richard Scurfield, David Sleet, Dinesh Mohan, Adnan Hyder, Eva Jarawan, and Colin Mathers. 2004. World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization. landing page:; pdf:;jsessionid=00B6FC20384C03E852368B0EF4510577?sequence=1. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  41. Rossy, Ginger, Carlos Sun, Dan Jessen, and Earl Newman. 2012. Residential Speed Limit Reduction Case Studies. The Open Transportation Journal 6: 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tingvall, Claes and Narelle Haworth. 1999. “Vision Zero: An Ethical Approach to Safety and Mobility.” Melbourne, Australia, 6–7 September. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  43. Transportation Research Board. 1998. Managing Speed: Review of Current Practice for Setting and Enforcing Speed Limits Report 254. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  44. Vision Zero Network. 2017. Prioritizing Internal City Coordination to Advance, Track Vision Zero: A New York City Case Study: Vision Zero Network. landing page:;pdf; Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  45. Vision Zero Network. 2019. Vision Zero Cities Map: Vision Zero Network. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

  46. Warner, Henriette, and Lars Åberg. 2008. Drivers’ Beliefs about Exceeding the Speed Limits. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 11(5): 376–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Weber, Bryan. 2014. Can Safe Ride Programs Reduce Urban Crime? Regional Science and Urban Economics 48: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wegman, Fred, Hans-Yngve Berg, Iain Cameron, Claire Thompson, Stefan Siegrist, and Wendy Weijermars. 2015. Evidence-Based and Data-Driven Road Safety Management. IATSS Research 39(1): 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wong, S.C., N.N. Sze, Hong K. Lo, W.T. Hung, and Becky P.Y. Loo. 2005. Would Relaxing Speed Limits Aggravate Safety?: A Case Study of Hong Kong. Accident Analysis and Prevention 37: 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. World Health Organization. 2018. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization. landing page:; pdf: Accessed 19 Sept 2019.

Download references


The authors would like to thank Jason Barr, João Pereira dos Santos, and two anonymous referees for very helpful comments and suggestions. Carly Dennis and Emma Joslyn provided excellent research assistance.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Mammen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mammen, K., Shim, H.S. & Weber, B.S. Vision Zero: Speed Limit Reduction and Traffic Injury Prevention in New York City. Eastern Econ J 46, 282–300 (2020).

Download citation


  • Traffic
  • Safety
  • Traffic laws

JEL Classification

  • R410
  • R480