Re-Thinking Debt Burden: Going with the Flow?
- 27 Downloads
This paper provides an empirical framework for computing a flow measure of public debt called the debt-to-duration ratio. A ratio of this measure to GDP (DD-to-GDP) is a unit-free measure of debt burden interpreted as the percentage of income for debt service or repayment. Using monthly US Treasury data (1997–2018), we compare this measure to the debt-to-GDP ratio. The DD-to-GDP ratio is an alternative for use in discussions about sustainability of current levels of debt. An empirical test of the relationship between rising debt ratios and growth shows that duration has an important counteracting relationship with higher debt lowering growth but longer duration being associated with higher growth in the medium term.
KeywordsDebt Fiscal policy Duration Interest rate Debt management
JEL ClassificationE62 E66 E6
The authors wish to thank Adam Diehl for his helpful assistance.
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service, U.S. Department of Treasury. 2018. Treasury Bulletin: March. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Treasury.Google Scholar
- Cecchetti, Stephen G., Madhusudan S. Mohanty, and Fabrizio Zampolli. 2011. Achieving Growth Amid Fiscal Imbalances: The Real Effects of Debt. In Achieving Maximum Long-Run Growth, A symposium sponsored by The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. https://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/sympos/2011/Cecchetti_final.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2018.
- Cochrane, John H. 2012. Having Your Cake and Eating It Too: The Maturity Structure of U.S. Debt. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/papers/Maturity_of_debt.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2018. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Chicago.
- Congressional Budget Office. 2018. The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2018 to 2028. Congressional Budget Office: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Domar, Evsey D. 1944. The “Burden of the Debt” and the National Income. The American Economic Review 34(4): 798–827.Google Scholar
- Drehmann, Mathias and Mikael Juselius. 2012. Do Debt Service Costs Affect Macroeconomic and Financial Stability? BIS Quarterly Review 3: 21–35.Google Scholar
- Gokhale, Jagadeesh, and Kent Smetters. 2003. New Budget Measures for New Budget Priorities. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, Robin, Samuel G. Hanson, Joshua S. Rudolph, and Lawrence Summers. 2015b. The Optimal Maturity of Government Debt. In The $13 Trillion Question: How America Manages Its Debt, Chapter 1, ed. David Wessel, 1–41. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Gurkaynak, Refet S., Brian Sack, and Jonathan H. Wright. 2006. The U.S. Treasury Yield Curve: 1961 to Present. Finance and Economics Discussion Series: Division of Research and Statistics and Monetary Affairs Paper No. 2006–28.Google Scholar
- Krugman, Paul. 2015. Debt is Good. New York Times, August 21, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/21/opinion/paul-krugman-debt-is-good-for-the-economy.html. Accessed August 1, 2018.
- Kumar, Manmohan S. and Jaejoon Woo. 2010. Public Debt and Growth. IMF Working Papers 10/174.Google Scholar
- Lerner, Abba P. 1943. Functional Finance and the Federal Debt. Social Research 10(1): 38–51.Google Scholar
- Macaulay, Frederick R. 1938. Some Theoretical Problems Suggested by the Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields, and Stock Prices in the United States since 1856. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Missale, Alessandro, and Olivier J. Blanchard. 1994. The Debt Burden and Debt Maturity. American Economic Review 84(1): 309–319.Google Scholar
- Office of Debt Management, U.S. Department of Treasury. 2017. Treasury Presentation to TBAC: Fiscal Year 2017 Q3 Report. U.S. Department of Treasury: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Office of Debt Management, U.S. Department of Treasury. 2018. Treasury Presentation to TBAC: Fiscal Year 2018 Q2 Report. U.S. Department of Treasury: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Shiller, Robert J. 2011. Debt and Delusion. Social Europe, July 22, 2011. https://www.socialeurope.eu/debt-and-delusion. Accessed August 1, 2018.