Navigating Disaster: An Empirical Study of Federal Assistance Following Hurricane Sandy
Federal disaster assistance should only compensate disaster victims for the damage sustained. Using zip code-level data on federal disaster assistance, this paper examines the FEMA Individuals and Households Program following Hurricane Sandy. We show that the extent of the damage does appear to explain much of the differences in the size of the federal disaster award that individuals receive. However, other factors, including percentage of foreign-born and the educational attainment levels of individuals in a community, also explain damage assessments and assistance levels. We argue that complexities in the application process may have disadvantaged foreign-born and less educated applicants.
KeywordsHurricane Sandy disaster assistance FEMA vulnerable populations
- Bolin R.C., and Stanford L.M. 1993. Emergency Sheltering and Housing of Earthquake Victims: The Case of Santa Cruz County, in The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Public Response, edited by P.A. Bolton, pp. B43–50. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1553B. Washington, DC: USGPOGoogle Scholar
- Briggs, Xavier de Souza. 1998. Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Many Faces of Social Capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1): 177–220.Google Scholar
- Chamlee-Wright, Emily, and Virgil Henry Storr. 2009. Club goods and post-disaster community return. Rationality and Society 21(4): 429–458.Google Scholar
- Gladwin, Hugh, and Walter Gillis Peacock. 1997. Warning and Evacuation: A Night for Hard Houses, in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and Sociology of Disasters, edited by Walter Gillis Peacock, Betty Hearn Morrow, and Hugh Gladwin. London: Routledge, 52–74.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, and Smith, Vernon L. 1996. Social Distance and Other Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games. American Economic Review, 86(3): 653–60.Google Scholar
- Hooks, Jonathan, and Trisha Miller. 2006. The Continuing Storm: How Disaster Recovery Excludes Those Most in Need. California Western Law Review, 43(1): 21-73.Google Scholar
- Ihlanfeldt, Keith R., and David L. Sjoquist. 1990. Job Accessibility and Racial Differences in Youth Employment Rates. The American Economic Review, 80(1): 267–276.Google Scholar
- Morrow, B.H. 1997. Stretching the Bonds: The Families of Andrew, in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disaster, edited by Walter Gillis Peacock, Betty Hearn Morrow, and Hugh Gladwin. London: Routledge, 141–170.Google Scholar
- O’Regan, Katherine M., and John M. Quigley. 1999. Spatial Isolation and Welfare Recipients: What Do We Know? Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy Available online at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mz642ft.pdf.
- Sobel, Russell, Christopher Coyne, and Peter Leeson. 2007. The Political Economy of FEMA: Did Reorganization Matter? Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 17(2–3): 49–65.Google Scholar
- Subervi-Velez, F.A., Denney, M, Ozuna, A, Quintero, C, and Palerm, J. 1992. Communicating with California’s Spanish-speaking populations during emergencies. California Policy Seminar Brief, 4(12).Google Scholar