Navigating Disaster: An Empirical Study of Federal Assistance Following Hurricane Sandy

  • Laura E. Grube
  • Rosemarie Fike
  • Virgil Henry Storr
Article

Abstract

Federal disaster assistance should only compensate disaster victims for the damage sustained. Using zip code-level data on federal disaster assistance, this paper examines the FEMA Individuals and Households Program following Hurricane Sandy. We show that the extent of the damage does appear to explain much of the differences in the size of the federal disaster award that individuals receive. However, other factors, including percentage of foreign-born and the educational attainment levels of individuals in a community, also explain damage assessments and assistance levels. We argue that complexities in the application process may have disadvantaged foreign-born and less educated applicants.

Keywords

Hurricane Sandy disaster assistance FEMA vulnerable populations 

JEL

H5 Z1 

References

  1. Beggs, John J., Haines, Valerie, and Hurlbert, Jeanne S. 1996. Situational Contingencies Surrounding The Receipt Of Informal Support. Social Forces, 75(1): 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand, Marianne, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Eldar Shafir. 2004. A Behavioral Economics View of Poverty. American Economic Review, 94(2): 419–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohnet, Iris, and Bruno S. Frey. 1999. Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment. American Economic Review, 89(1): 335–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolin R.C., and Stanford L.M. 1993. Emergency Sheltering and Housing of Earthquake Victims: The Case of Santa Cruz County, in The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989Public Response, edited by P.A. Bolton, pp. B43–50. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1553B. Washington, DC: USGPOGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs, Xavier de Souza. 1998. Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Many Faces of Social Capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1): 177–220.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, Karen E., Peter V. Marsden, and Jeanne S. Hurlbert. 1986. Social Resources and Socioeconomic Status. Social Networks, 8: 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamlee-Wright, Emily, and Virgil Henry Storr. 2009. Club goods and post-disaster community return. Rationality and Society 21(4): 429–458.Google Scholar
  8. Craemer, Thomas. 2010. Evaluating Racial Disparities in Hurricane Katrina Relief Using Direct Trailer Counts in New Orleans and Fema Records. Public Administration Review, 70(3): 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fothergill, Alice, and Lori Peek. 2004. Poverty and Disasters in the United States: A Review of Recent Sociological Findings. Natural Hazards, 32: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fothergill, Alice, JoAnne DeRouen Darlington, and Enrique G. M. Maestas. 1999. Race, Ethnicity, and Disasters in the United States: A Literature Review. Disasters, 23(2): 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrett, Thomas, and Russell Sobel. 2003. The political economy of FEMA disaster payments. Economic Inquiry, 41(3): 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gladwin, Hugh, and Walter Gillis Peacock. 1997. Warning and Evacuation: A Night for Hard Houses, in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and Sociology of Disasters, edited by Walter Gillis Peacock, Betty Hearn Morrow, and Hugh Gladwin. London: Routledge, 52–74.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, and Smith, Vernon L. 1996. Social Distance and Other Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games. American Economic Review, 86(3): 653–60.Google Scholar
  14. Holzer, Harry J., John M. Quigley, and Steven Raphael. 2003. Public Transit and the Spatial Distribution of Minority Employment: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(3): 415–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hooks, Jonathan, and Trisha Miller. 2006. The Continuing Storm: How Disaster Recovery Excludes Those Most in Need. California Western Law Review, 43(1): 21-73.Google Scholar
  16. Ihlanfeldt, Keith R., and David L. Sjoquist. 1990. Job Accessibility and Racial Differences in Youth Employment Rates. The American Economic Review, 80(1): 267–276.Google Scholar
  17. Leeson, Peter, and Russell Sobel. 2008. Weathering Corruption. Journal of Law and Economics, 51: 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masozera, Michel, Melissa Bailey, and Charles Kerchner. 2007. Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: A case study of New Orleans. Ecological Economics, 63: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morrow, B.H. 1997. Stretching the Bonds: The Families of Andrew, in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disaster, edited by Walter Gillis Peacock, Betty Hearn Morrow, and Hugh Gladwin. London: Routledge, 141–170.Google Scholar
  20. O’Regan, Katherine M., and John M. Quigley. 1999. Spatial Isolation and Welfare Recipients: What Do We Know? Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy Available online at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mz642ft.pdf.
  21. Shughart, William F. 2006. “Katrinanomics: The Politics and Economics of Disaster Relief. Public Choice, 127(1–2): 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, Sandra S. 2000. Mobilizing Social Resources: Race, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Social Capital and Persisting Wage Inequalities. The Sociological Quarterly, 41(4): 509–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sobel, Russell, Christopher Coyne, and Peter Leeson. 2007. The Political Economy of FEMA: Did Reorganization Matter? Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 17(2–3): 49–65.Google Scholar
  24. Sobel, Russell, and Peter Leeson. 2006. Government’s Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Public Choice Analysis. Public Choice, 127: 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Subervi-Velez, F.A., Denney, M, Ozuna, A, Quintero, C, and Palerm, J. 1992. Communicating with California’s Spanish-speaking populations during emergencies. California Policy Seminar Brief, 4(12).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EEA 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura E. Grube
    • 1
  • Rosemarie Fike
    • 2
  • Virgil Henry Storr
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBeloit CollegeBeloitUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsTexas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations