Skip to main content

The Future of Agent-Based Modeling

Eastern Economic Journal volume 43, pages 271–287 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

In this paper, I elaborate on the role of agent-based (AB) modeling for macroeconomic research. My main tenet is that the full potential of the AB approach has not been realized yet. This potential lies in the modular nature of the models, which is bought by abandoning the straitjacket of rational expectations and embracing an evolutionary perspective. I envisage the foundation of a Modular Macroeconomic Science, where new models with heterogeneous interacting agents, endowed with partial information and limited computational ability, can be created by recombining and extending existing models in a unified computational framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  • Abramovitz, Moses. 1956. Resource and Output Trends in the U.S. since 1870. American Economic Review, 46(2): 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, Morris. 2006. Handbook of Contemporary Behavior Economics: Foundations and Developments. Armonk, NY: M E Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anufriev, Mikhail, and Cars H. Hommes. 2013. Evolutionary Selection of Expectations in Positive and Negative Feedback Markets. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23(3): 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascari, Guido, Giorgio Fagiolo, and Andrea Roventini. 2013. Fat-Tail Distributions and Business-Cycle Models. Macroeconomic Dynamics. Available on CJO2013. doi:10.1017/S1365100513000473.

  • Askenazi, Manor, Roger Burkhart, Chris Langton, and Nelson Minar. 1996. The Swarm Simulation System: A Toolkit for Building Multi-Agent Simulations. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper no. 96-06-042.

  • Bagehot, Walter. 1873. Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market. London: Henry S. King and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballot, Gérard, and Erol Taymaz. 2001. Training Policies and Economic Growth in an Evolutionary World. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 12(3): 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiston, Stefano, Domenico Delli Gatti, Mauro Gallegati, Bruce Greenwald, Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2007. Credit Chains and Bankruptcy Propagation in Production Networks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(6): 2061–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiston, Stefano, Domenico Delli Gatti, Mauro Gallegati, Bruce Greenwald, Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2012. Default Cascades: When Does Risk Diversification Increase Stability? Journal of Financial Stability, 8(3): 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, Olivier, 2009. The State of Macro. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1): 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, William A., and Cars H. Hommes. 1997. A Rational Route to Randomness. Econometrica, 65(5): 1059–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzoza-Brzezina, Michal, Marcin Kolasa, and Krzysztof Makarski. 2013. The Anatomy of Standard DSGE Models with Financial Frictions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(1): 32–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, Ricardo J. 2010. Macroeconomics After the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense of Knowledge Syndrome. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(4): 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, Lawrence J, Martin S. Eichenbaum, and Mathias Trabandt. 2015. Understanding the Great Recession. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(1): 110–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David. 2005. The Future of Economics: the Appropriately Educated in Pursuit of the Knowable. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29: 927–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David, ed. 2006. Post Walrasian Macroeconomics. Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David, Peter Howitt, Alan Kirman, Axel Leijonhufvud, and Perry Mehrling. 2008. Beyond DSGE Models: Toward an Empirically Based Macroeconomics. The American Economic Review, 98(2): 236–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, Herbert, Philipp Harting, and Michael Neugart. 2014. Economic Convergence: Policy Implications From a Heterogeneous Agent Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 44(C): 54–80.

  • Dawid, Herbert, and Michael Neugart. 2015. Agent-Based Macroeconomic modeling and Policy Analysis: The Eurace@Unibi Model. In: Chen, Shu-Heng, and Mak Kaboudan, eds. Handbook on Computational Economics and Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, Paul. 2012. Booms and Busts in Economic Activity: A Behavioral Explanation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83: 484–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, Paul, and Agnieszka Markiewicz. 2013. Learning to Forecast the Exchange Rate: Two Competing Approaches. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32: 42–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Negro, Marco, Marc P. Giannoni, and Frank Schorfheide. 2015. Inflation in the Great Recession and New Keynesian Models. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(1): 168–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna, Stefano. 2009. Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2): 315–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Gatti, Domenico, Corrado Di Guilmi, Edoardo Gaffeo, Mauro Gallegati, Gianfranco Giulioni, and Antonio Palestrini. 2005. A New Approach to Business Fluctuations: Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, Scaling Laws and Financial Fragility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56: 489–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Gatti, Domenico, Mauro Gallegati, Bruce Greenwald, Alberto Russo, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2010. The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(9): 1627–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delong, J. and Bradford. 2011. Economics in Crisis. The Economists’ Voice, May.

  • Dosi, Giovanni, Giorgio Fagiolo, and Andrea Roventini. 2010. Schumpeter Meeting Keynes: A Policy-Friendly Model of Endogenous Growth and Business Cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 34: 1748–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni, Giorgio Fagiolo, Mauro Napoletano, and Andrea Roventini. 2013. Income Distribution, Credit and Fiscal Policies in An Agent-Based Keynesian Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 37: 1598–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durieu, Jacques, and Philippe Solal. 2012. Models of Adaptive Learning in Game Theory, in Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, edited by Arena, Richard, Agnès Festré, and Nathalie Lazaric. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Epstein, Joshua M. 2007. Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, George W., and Seppo Honkapohja. 2013. Learning as a Rational Foundation for Macroeconomics and Finance, in Rethinking Expectations: The Way Forward for Macroeconomics, edited by Frydman, Roman, and Edmund S. Phelps. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, George W., and Seppo Honkapohja. 2009. Learning and Macroeconomics. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1): 421–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, J. Doyne, and Duncan Foley. 2009. The Economy Needs Agent-Based modeling. Nature, 460: 685–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Villaverde, Jesus, Pablo A. Guerrón-Quintana, and Juan F. Rubio-Ramírez. 2010. Fortune or Virtue: Time-Variant Volatilities Versus Parameter Drifting in U.S. Data. NBER Working Paper 15928.

  • Freeman, Richard B. 1998. War of the Models: Which Labor Market Institutions for the 21st Century? Labor Economics, 5: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, John, Robert Axtell, J. Doyne Farmer, Peter Howitt, Benjamin Conlee, Jonathan Goldstein, Matthew Hendrey, Nathan M. Palmer, and Chun-Yi Yang. 2012. Getting at Systemic Risk via an Agent-Based Model of the Housing Market. American Economic Review, 102(3): 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, Gerd, Ralph Hertwig, and Thorsten Pachur, eds. 2011. Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Peter M. Todd 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, Herbert. 2007. The Dynamics of General Equilibrium. The Economic Journal, 117: 1280–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gode, Dhananjay K, and Shyam Sunders. 1993. Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero-Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality. Journal of Political Economy, 101(1): 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazzini, Jakob, and Matteo G. Richiardi. 2015. Consistent Estimation of Agent-Based Models by Simulated Minimum Distance. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 51: 148–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, Jonathan, Kjetil Storesletten, and Giovanni L. Violante. 2009. Quantitative Macroeconomics with Heterogeneous Households. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1): 319–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommes, Cars H. 2013. Behavioral Rationality and Heterogeneous Expectations in Complex Economic Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hommes, Cars H., and Paolo Zeppini. 2014. Innovate or Imitate? Behavioral Technological Change. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 48(C): 308–324.

  • Kindleberger, Charles. 1978. Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, Alan P. 2010. The Economic Crisis is a Crisis for Economic Theory. CESifo Economic Studies, 56(4): 498–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, Alan P. 2011. Learning in Agent-based Models. Eastern Economic Journal, 37(1): 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 2011. The Profession and the Crisis. Eastern Economic Journal, 37: 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, Blake, and Leigh Tesfatsion. 2008. modeling Macroeconomies as Open-Ended Dynamic Systems of Interacting Agents. The American Economic Review, 98(2): 246–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leombruni, Roberto, and Matteo G. Richiardi. 2005. Why Are Economists Sceptical About Agent-Based Simulations? Physica A, 355(1): 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leombruni, Roberto, Matteo G. Richiardi, Nicole J. Saam, and Michele Sonnessa. 2006. A Common Protocol for Agent-Based Social Simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 9(1): art 15.

  • Li, Hongyan, and Leigh Tesfatsion. 2012. Co-learning Patterns as Emergent Market Phenomena: An Electricity Market Illustration. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82: 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Hyman P. 1982. Can ‘it’ Happen Again? Essays on Instability and Finance. New York: M E Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Hyman P. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobius M, Rosenblat T. 2014. Social Learning in Economics. Annual Review of Economics, 6:827–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neugart, Michael, and Matteo G. Richiardi. 2015. Agent-based models of the labor market. LABORatorio Revelli WP 125/2012, in Handbook on Computational Economics and Finance, edited by Chen, Shu-Heng, and Mak Kaboudan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Paddrik, Mark E., Roy Hayes Jr., William T. Scherer, and Peter Beling. 2014. Effects of Limit Order Book Information Level on Market Stability Metrics. Office of Financial Research, OFR Working Paper 14-09.

  • Poledna, Sebastian, Stefan Thurner, J. Doyne Farmer, and John Geanakoplos. 2014. Leverage-induced systemic risk under Basle II and other credit risk policies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 42: 199–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richiardi, Matteo G. 2006. Toward a Non-Equilibrium Unemployment Theory. Computational Economics, 27(1): 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richiardi, Matteo G. 2012. Agent-based Computational Economics. A Short Introduction. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 27(S2): 137–149.

  • Richiardi, Matteo G. 2013. The missing link: AB models and dynamic microsimulation, in Artificial Economics and Self Organization. Agent-Based Approaches to Economics and Social Systems, edited by Leitner S, Wall, F. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 669. Berlin: Springer.

  • Richiardi, Matteo G., and Ross Richardson. 2016. JAS-mine: A New Platform for Microsimulation and Agent-Based Modelling. Nuffield College Economic Working Papers 2016-W04.

  • Schelling, Thomas C. 1969. Models of Segregation. American Economic Review, 59(2): 488–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitskaya, Ekaterina, and Leigh Tesfatsion. 2015. Macroeconomies as Constructively Rational Games. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 61(December):152–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, Frank, and Raf Wouters. 2003. An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(5): 1123–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Noah. 2014. The most damning critique of DSGE. Noahpinion blog, 14 January 2014.

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. E. 2011. Rethinking Macroeconomics: What Failed, and How to Repair it. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9:591–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Mauro Gallegati. 2011. Heterogeneous Interacting Agent Models for Understanding Monetary Economies. Eastern Economic Journal, 37(1): 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teglio, Andrea, Marco Raberto, and Silvano Cincotti. 2012. The Impact Of Banks’ Capital Adequacy Regulation On The Economic System: An Agent-Based Approach. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(supp02): 1250040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, Leigh. 2011. Agent-Based modeling and Institutional Design. Eastern Economic Journal, 37(1): 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Peter M., and Gerd Gigerenzer. 2012. Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trichet, Jean-Claude. 2010. Reflections on the nature of monetary policy non-standard measures and finance theory. Speech at the Opening address at the ECB Central Banking Conference, Frankfurt, 18 November 2010.

  • Vriend, Nicolaas J. 2000. An Illustration of the Essential Difference Between Individual and Social Learning, and Its Consequences for Computational Analyzes. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 24(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbuch, Gérard, and Stefano Battiston. 2007. From Production Networks to Geographical Economies. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(3–4): 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, M. 2014. How did we get to where we are now? Reflections on 50 years of macroeconomic and financial econometrics. University of York Discussion Papers in Economics No. 14/17.

  • Wickens, Michael R. 2014. How Did We Get to Where We Are Now? Reflections on 50 years of Macroeconomic and Financial Econometrics. University of York Discussion Papers in Economics No. 14/17.

  • Wolfson, Michael, Steve Gribble, and Reed Beall. 2016. Exploring Contingent Inequalities – Building the Theoretical Health Inequality Model, in Agent-Based modeling in Population Studies, edited by Grow, Andre’, and Jan van Bavel. Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis. Berlin: Springe.

  • Woodford, Michael (2013). Macroeconomic Analysis Without the Rational Expectations Hypothesis. Annual Reviews of Economics, 5: 303–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolridge, Michael. 2009. An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper has benefited from insightful discussions with Doyne Farmer, Dan Tang, David Pough, Christoph Aymanns, and other researchers at the Institute of New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School. All errors or omissions are my sole responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for New Economic Thinking, Eagle House, Walton Well Road, Oxford, OX2 6ED, UK

    Matteo G. Richiardi

  2. Universita’ di Torino, Torino, Italy

    Matteo G. Richiardi

  3. Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri, Italy

    Matteo G. Richiardi

Authors
  1. Matteo G. Richiardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo G. Richiardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richiardi, M.G. The Future of Agent-Based Modeling. Eastern Econ J 43, 271–287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-016-0075-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-016-0075-9

Keywords

  • agent-based
  • simulation
  • macroeconomics
  • modularity

JEL

  • B40
  • C63
  • E17