Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unwanted Identities: The ‘Religion Line’ and Global Islamophobia

  • Upfront
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

The article discusses why Islamophobia constitutes a major racist discourse today and illustrates how we can make sense of this global relevance of Islamophobia. The author explains the centrality of the ‘religion line’ in the current global world system by drawing on the post-Cold War era. Through a decolonial reading of Islamophobia, three empirical cases are chosen to discuss differences and commonalities between various forms of Islamophobia in the Xingjiang/China, Egypt, and the USA exploring the effects of this global phenomenon on the discursive construction of identities, citizenship rights, and governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://belonging.berkeley.edu/global-justice/islamophobia/resource-pack-us.

  2. Congressional-Executive Commission on China, Chairs Urge Ambassador Branstad to Prioritize Mass Detention of Uyghurs, Including Family Members of Radio Free Asia Employees, https://www.cecc.gov/media-center/press-releases/chairs-urge-ambassador-branstad-to-prioritize-mass-detention-of-uyghurs.

  3. 新疆维吾尔自治区去极端化条例 (Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Regulations on Depolarization), March 30, 2017, http://xj.people.com.cn/n2/2017/0330/c186332-29942874.html.

  4. Amnesty International: UP TO ONE MILLION DETAINED IN CHINA’S MASS “RE-EDUCATION” DRIVE, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/09/china-up-to-one-million-detained/.

  5. CUNY School of Law: Mapping Muslims: NYPD Spying and Its Impact on American Muslims, https://www.law.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/page-assets/academics/clinics/immigration/clear/Mapping-Muslims.pdf [retrieved on 01/06/2019].

  6. Bridge Initiative Team: Factsheet: Donald Trump as presidential candidate and president-elect, 2 December 2019, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/factsheet-donald-trump-as-presidential-candidate-president-elect/.

  7. Bridge Initiative Team: Factsheet: Donald Trump as presidential candidate and president-elect, 2 December 2019, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/factsheet-donald-trump-as-presidential-candidate-president-elect/.

  8. The Bridge Initiative, The Muslim Bans, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research-publications/reports/muslimban/.

  9. Bridge Initiative Team, FACTSHEET: DONALD TRUMP AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 2 December 2019, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/factsheet-donald-trump-as-president-of-the-united-states/.

  10. Bridge Initiative Team, FACTSHEET: DONALD TRUMP AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 2 December 2019, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/factsheet-donald-trump-as-president-of-the-united-states/.

  11. Bridge Initiative Team, THE MUSLIM BANS: BY THE NUMBERS, 26 June 2019, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/muslim-bans-by-numbers/.

  12. Bridge Initiative Team (2016), Factsheet: Steve Bannon, 16 September 2016, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/factsheet-steve-bannon/.

  13. Bridge Initiative Team (2018), Factsheet: Stephen Miller, 30 November 2018, https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/stephen-miller/.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farid Hafez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hafez, F. Unwanted Identities: The ‘Religion Line’ and Global Islamophobia. Development 63, 9–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-020-00241-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-020-00241-5

Keywords

Navigation