Advertisement

Corporate Reputation Review

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 101–119 | Cite as

Challenges for a Multiple Identity Organization: A Case Study of the Dutch Blood Supply Foundation

  • Robert HeckertEmail author
Original Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

An organization that gives several answers to the “who are you?” question is a multiple identity organization. When those identities are based on antithetic value systems, identification by organizational members may be complicated. In this case study the Dutch Blood Supply Foundation Sanquin serves as an example of a multiple identity organization. A mixed method approach is used to determine the multiplicity of organizational identity and thereby tries to enrich theory about identity and identification. Since identity is conceptualized as what organizational members find central, distinctive and enduring, the answer to the identity question is obtained by semi-structured interviews with employees and by a questionnaire. The Sanquin identities turn out to be the ones that are usually recognized in multi-identities: an ideological and a utilitarian identity. The multi-identity character of the organization hampers the identification of organizational members, but they still identify with the organization’s mission. The interview results provoke discussion about the enduring identity proposition. The utilitarian identity partly has displaced the ideological identity in a rather short period of time. Identity in a multiple identity is dynamic rather than enduring or continuous. Possible generalizations are discussed.

Keywords

Multiple identity Identification Organizational change Identity change Value system 

Notes

References

  1. Albert, S., and D.A. Whetten. 1985. Organizational Identity. Research in Organizational Behavior 7: 263–295.Google Scholar
  2. Argenti, P.A. 2013. Corporate communication, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B.E., K.M. Rogers, M.G. Pratt, and C. Pradies. 2014. Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science 25 (5): 1453–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacherjee, Anol. 2012. Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. Florida: Tampa.Google Scholar
  5. Brands, W., and J.V. Kan (eds.). 2015. Nederland, een objectief zelfportret in 51 voorwerpen. Amsterdam: Balans.Google Scholar
  6. Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2015. Business research methods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, M., and Gretler, C. 2016. Take two butterfingers and call me in the morning, Bloomberg Businessweek, [Online], no. May 9, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Chreim, S. 2005. The continuity-change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. The Journal of Management Studies 42 (3): 567–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, L.T., and G. Cheney. 2000. Self-absorption and self-seduction in the corporate identity game. In The expressive organization, ed. M. Schultz, M.J. Hatch, and M.H. Larsen, 246–270. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Corley, K.G., and D.A. Gioia. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (2): 173–208.Google Scholar
  11. Corley, K., C. Harquail, M. Pratt, M. Glynn, C. Fiol, and M. Hatch. 2006. Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry 15 (2): 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creswell, John W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches. 2 ed. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Diefenbach, T. 2009. Are case studies more than sophisticated storytelling? Methodological problems of qualitative empirical research mainly based on semi-structured interviews. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 43 (6): 875–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duursma, M., and Logtenberg, H. 2015. Opstand der commissarissen. NRC Handelsblad, no. September 12, 2015.Google Scholar
  15. Effectory. 2013. Medewerkersonderzoek Sanquin Bloedvoorziening. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt, K.M., and M.E. Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elstak, M.N., M. Bhatt, C.B.M. Van Riel, M.G. Pratt, and G.A.J.M. Berens. 2015. Organizational identification during a merger: The role of self-enhancement and uncertainty reduction motives during a major organizational change. The Journal of Management Studies 52 (1): 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiol, C.M. 2002. Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science 13 (6): 653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foreman, P., and D.A. Whetten. 2002. Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science 13 (6): 618–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franzen, G., S. Moriarty, and Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Commerciële Communicatie. 2009. The science and art of branding. Sharpe: Armonk.Google Scholar
  21. Giessner, S.R., K.E. Horton, and S.I.W. Humborstad. 2016. Identity management during organizational mergers: Empirical insights and practical advice. Social Issues and Policy Review 10 (1): 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gioia, Dennis A., and James B. Thomas. 1996. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (3): 370–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gioia, D.A., S.D. Patvardhan, A.L. Hamilton, and K.G. Corley. 2013. Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 123–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glynn, Mary Ann. 2000. When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science 11 (3): 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glynn, M.A., P.S. Barr, and M.T. Dacin. 2000. Pluralism and the problem of variety. The Academy of Management Review 25 (4): 726–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Golden-Biddle, K., and H. Rao. 1997. Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science 8 (6): 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwood, R., and C.R. Hinings. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review 21 (4): 1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall, Stuart. 1989. Cultural identity and diaspora. Framework, the Journal of Cinema and Media 36: 222–237.Google Scholar
  29. Hatch, M.J., and M. Schultz. 2000. Scaling the Tower of Babel: Relational differences between identity, image, and culture in organizations. In The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand, ed. M. Schultz, M.J. Hatch, and M.H. Larsen, 11–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Heckert, R. 2016. The Janus-faced pelican. A multiple identity study. MSc thesis Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  31. Heighton, Michael, and Rengers, Merijn. 2008. Het rode goud. Volkskrant, Feb. 16, 2008.Google Scholar
  32. Humphreys, M., and A.D. Brown. 2002. Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies 23 (3): 421–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jäger, U.P., and A. Schröer. 2014. Integrated organizational identity: A definition of hybrid organizations and a research agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25 (5): 1281–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King, Brayden G. 2015. Organizational actors, character, and Selznick’s theory of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 44: 149–174.Google Scholar
  35. Kroeze, Jochem J., and Purcey P.M.A.R. Heugens. 2012. Organizational identity formation: Processes of identity imprinting and enactment in the Dutch microbrewing landscape, 2012, 2012-01-19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lam, A. 2010. From `ivory tower traditionalists’ to `entrepreneurial scientists’? Social Studies of Science 40 (2): 307–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Navis, C., and M.A. Glynn. 2010. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (3): 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pratt, M.G., and P.O. Foreman. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. The Academy of Management Review 25 (1): 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Riel, C.B.M. 2012. The alignment factor: Leveraging the power of total stakeholder support. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Riel, C.M.B.M.V., and C.J. Fombrun. 2007. Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanders, M.L., and J.G. McClellan. 2014. Being business-like while pursuing a social mission: Acknowledging the inherent tensions in US non-profit organizing. Organization 21 (1): 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schultz, M., M.J. Hatch, and M. Holten Larsen. 2000. The expressive organization linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, S.G., and V.R. Lane. 2000. A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. The Academy of Management Review 25 (1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sillince, J.A., and A.D. Brown. 2009. Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites. Human Relations 62 (12): 1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smidts, A. 2001. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal 44 (5): 1051–1062.Google Scholar
  46. Sung, W., M.L. Woehler, J.M. Fagan, and G. Labianca. 2015. Individuals’ responses to organizational mergers. Academy of Management Proceedings 1: 13851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. TNS NIPO. 2014. Sanquin op koers voor 2016? Unpublished.Google Scholar
  48. Van de Ven, A.H., and M.S. Poole. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 510–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Knippenberg, Daan, and Ed Sleebos. 2006. Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: self definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (5): 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weick, Karl E., and Robert E. Quinn. 1999. Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, L. 2017. 2017, How to understand Stuart hall’s “identity” properly? Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 18 (2): 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Reputation Institute and Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations