Corporate Reputation Review

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 89–100 | Cite as

An Examination of Consumers’ Subjective Views that Affect the Favorability of Organizational Logos: An Exploratory Study Using Q Methodology

  • Angie ChungEmail author
  • Dennis F. Kinsey
Original Article


This study used Q methodology to uncover the different perspectives that exist regarding the factors that affect the favorability of organizational logos. Studies that have examined the factors that influence consumers’ attitudes toward logos have largely used traditional research methods based on measures that have been prespecified by the researcher(s). Q methodology takes a fundamentally different approach—it is a mixture of both qualitative and quantitative aspects of research that allows participants to speak for themselves. In this study, we used unstructured sampling of 50 logos and had 40 participants rank-order the logos from “most appealing” (+ 5) to “most unappealing” (− 5). Three different perspectives emerged from the correlation and factor analysis. The first group preferred logos with bright colors, the second group thought logos with living creatures were appealing, and the third group was attracted to logos evoking a sense of movement. The findings and implications of this Q methodology study can help managers develop more effective communication strategies using organizational logos.


Organizational logos Corporate identity Corporate reputation Q methodology Public relations 



  1. Addams, H., and J.L. Proops (eds.). 2000. Social discourse and environmental policy: An application of Q methodology. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Alessandri, S.W., S.U. Yang, and D.F. Kinsey. 2006. An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 9 (4): 258–270.Google Scholar
  3. Argenti, P.A., and B. Druckenmiller. 2004. Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review 6 (4): 368–374.Google Scholar
  4. Bacher, K., A. Gordoa, and E. Mikkelsen. 2014. Stakeholders’ perceptions of marine fish farming in Catalonia (Spain): A Q-methodology approach. Aquaculture 424: 78–85.Google Scholar
  5. Bachkirova, T., J. Sibley, and A.C. Myers. 2015. Developing and applying a new instrument for microanalysis of the coaching process: The coaching process Q-set. Human Resource Development Quarterly 26 (4): 431–462.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, R., J. Wildman, H. Mason, and C. Donaldson. 2014. Q-ing for health—A new approach to eliciting the public’s views on health care resource allocation. Health Economics 23 (3): 283–297.Google Scholar
  7. Balmer, J.M. 1998. Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 14 (8): 963–996.Google Scholar
  8. Bang, H.Y., E.J. Yeun, E. Ham, M. Jeon, and J.H. An. 2015. Perceptions about cancer-related fatigue among cancer patients using Q methodology. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 20: 64–70.Google Scholar
  9. Bellizzi, J.A., and R.E. Hite. 1992. Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood. Psychology & marketing 9 (5): 347–363.Google Scholar
  10. Berlyne, D.E. 1971. Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century- Crofts.Google Scholar
  11. Berryman, G. 1979. Notes on graphic design and visual communication. Los Altos, California: William Kaufmann Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Bhatt, B., I. Qureshi, and S. Riaz. 2017. Social entrepreneurship in non-munificent institutional environments and implications for institutional work: Insights from China. Journal of Business Ethics 1-26.Google Scholar
  13. Boyatzis, C.J., and R. Varghese. 1994. Children’s emotional associations with colors. The Journal of genetic psychology 155 (1): 77–85.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, S.R. 1980. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, S.R. 1986. Q technique and method: Principles and procedures. In New tools for social scientists: Advances and applications in research methods, ed. W.D. Berry and M.S. Lewis-Beck, 17–34. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Carlson, J.M., and R. Trichtinger. 2001. Perspectives on entertainment television’s portrayal of a racial incident: An intensive analysis. The Communication Review 4 (2): 253–278.Google Scholar
  17. Cathcart, W.L. 1969. Viewer needs and desires in television newscasters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 14 (1): 55–62.Google Scholar
  18. Chebat, J.C., and M. Morrin. 2007. Colors and cultures: Exploring the effects of mall décor on consumer perceptions. Journal of business Research 60 (3): 189–196.Google Scholar
  19. Childers, T.L., and J. Jass. 2002. All dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations on brand perceptions and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12 (2): 93–106.Google Scholar
  20. Cian, L., A. Krishna, and R.S. Elder. 2014. This logo moves me: Dynamic imagery from static images. Journal of Marketing Research 51 (2): 184–197.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, C.H., and C. Michelle. 2011. Q methodology in audience research: Bridging the qualitative/quantitative ‘divide’. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 8 (2): 559–593.Google Scholar
  22. Diefenbach, J. 1987. The corporate identity as the brand. In Branding: A key marketing tool, ed. J.M. Murphy, 156–164. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Erdelyi, M.H., and J. Kleinbard. 1978. Has Ebbinghaus decayed with time? The growth of recall (hypermnesia) over days. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (4): 275–289.Google Scholar
  24. Exel, J., G. de Graaf, and W. Brouwer. 2007. Care for a break? An investigation of informal caregivers’ attitudes toward respite care using Q-methodology. Health Policy 83 (2): 332–342.Google Scholar
  25. Foroudi, P. 2019. Influence of brand signature, brand awareness, brand attitude, brand reputation on hotel industry’s brand performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management 76: 271–285.Google Scholar
  26. Foroudi, P., T.C. Melewar, and S. Gupta. 2014. Linking corporate logo, corporate image, and reputation: An examination of consumer perceptions in the financial setting. Journal of Business Research 67 (11): 2269–2281.Google Scholar
  27. Foroudi, P., S. Gupta, P. Kitchen, M.M. Foroudi, and B. Nguyen. 2016. A framework of place branding, place image, and place reputation: Antecedents and moderators. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 19 (2): 241–264.Google Scholar
  28. Foroudi, P., and E. Montes. 2017. Corporate e-communication: Its relationship with corporate logo in the construction of digital interaction platforms. The Bottom Line 30 (3): 201–215.Google Scholar
  29. Foroudi, P., K. Hafeez, and M.M. Foroudi. 2017a. Evaluating the impact of corporate logos towards corporate reputation: A case of Persia and Mexico. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 20 (2): 158–180.Google Scholar
  30. Foroudi, P., T.C. Melewar, and S. Gupta. 2017b. Corporate logo: History, definition, and components. International Studies of Management & Organization 47 (2): 176–196.Google Scholar
  31. Gallivan, J. 1994. Subjectivity and the psychology of gender: Q as a feminist methodology. In Women, girls and achievement, ed. S.D. Crozier, J. Gallivan, and V.M. Lalande, 29–36. New York, NY: Captus University.Google Scholar
  32. Gilpin, D. 2010. Organizational image construction in a fragmented online media environment. Journal of Public Relations Research 22 (3): 265–287.Google Scholar
  33. Hatch, M., and M. Schultz. 1997. Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing 31 (5/6): 356–365.Google Scholar
  34. Hatch, M.J., and M. Schultz. 2002. The dynamics of organizational identity. Human relations 55 (8): 989–1018.Google Scholar
  35. Hemphill, M. 1996. A note on adults’ color–emotion associations. The Journal of genetic psychology 157 (3): 275–280.Google Scholar
  36. Henderson, P.W., and J.A. Cote. 1998. Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos. The Journal of Marketing 62: 14–30.Google Scholar
  37. Henderson, P.W., J.A. Cote, S.M. Leong, and B. Schmitt. 2003. Building strong brands in Asia: Selecting the visual components of image to maximize brand strength. International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (4): 297–313.Google Scholar
  38. Herron-Marx, S., A. Williams, and C. Hicks. 2007. A Q methodology study of women’s experience of enduring postnatal perineal and pelvic floor morbidity. Midwifery 23 (3): 322–334.Google Scholar
  39. Hult, T.M., G. Ketchen, D.J. Shaojie, A. Cui, A.M. Prudhomme, S.H. Seggie, M.A. Stanko, X. Shichun, T. Cavusgil. 2006. An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in international business research. In Research methodology in strategy and management, 385–415, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  40. Hynes, N. 2009. Colour and meaning in corporate logos: An empirical study. Journal of Brand Management 16 (8): 545–555.Google Scholar
  41. Ki, C., K. Lee, and Y.K. Kim. 2017. Pleasure and guilt: How do they interplay in luxury consumption? European Journal of Marketing 51 (4): 722–747.Google Scholar
  42. Klooster, P., M. Visser, and M.D. de Jong. 2008. Comparing two image research instruments: The Q-sort method versus the Likert attitude questionnaire. Food Quality and Preference 19 (5): 511–518.Google Scholar
  43. Kohli, C., R. Suri, and M. Thakor. 2002. Creating effective logos: Insights from theory and practice. Business Horizons 45 (3): 58–64.Google Scholar
  44. Labrecque, L.I., and G.R. Milne. 2012. Exciting red and competent blue: The importance of color in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (5): 711–727.Google Scholar
  45. Laundry, T. 1998. Making logos matter. Harvard Business Review 76 (2): 16–17.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, S., L. Rodriguez, and S. Sar. 2012. The influence of logo design on country image and willingness to visit: A study of country logos for tourism. Public Relations Review 38 (4): 584–591.Google Scholar
  47. Levitt, R., and R.R. Owl. 2013. Effects of early literacy environments on the reading attitudes, behaviours and values of veteran teachers. Learning Environments Research 16 (3): 387–409.Google Scholar
  48. Machado, J.C., L.V. de Carvalho, A. Torres, and P. Costa. 2015. Brand logo design: Examining consumer response to naturalness. Journal of Product & Brand Management 24 (1): 78–87.Google Scholar
  49. Macklin, M.C. 1996. Preschoolers’ learning of brand names from visual cues. Journal of Consumer Research 23 (3): 251–261.Google Scholar
  50. Mazzalovo, G. 2012. Brand aesthetics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. McCarthy, M.S., and D.L. Mothersbaugh. 2002. Effects of typographic factors in advertising-based persuasion: A general model and initial empirical tests. Psychology & Marketing 19 (7–8): 663–691.Google Scholar
  52. McKeown, B., and D.B. Thomas. 1988. Q methodology. London, UK: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  53. Melewar, T.C., K. Bassett, and C. Simões. 2006. The role of communication and visual identity in modern organisations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 11 (2): 138–147.Google Scholar
  54. Meyers-Levy, J., and L.A. Peracchio. 1995. Understanding the effects of color: How the correspondence between available and required resources affects attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research 22 (2): 121–138.Google Scholar
  55. Mortensen, T., A. Keshelashvili, and T. Weir. 2015. Who we are: A Q-study of types of citizen journalists. Digital Journalism 4 (3): 359–378.Google Scholar
  56. Naspetti, S., S. Mandolesi, and R. Zanoli. 2016. Using visual Q sorting to determine the impact of photovoltaic applications on the landscape. Land Use Policy 57: 564–573.Google Scholar
  57. O’Connor, Z. 2011. Logo colour and differentiation: A new application of environmental colour mapping. Color Research & Application 36 (1): 55–60.Google Scholar
  58. Odbert, H.S., T.F. Karwoski, and A.B. Eckerson. 1942. Studies in synesthetic thinking: I. Musical and verbal associations of color and mood. The Journal of General Psychology 26 (1): 153–173.Google Scholar
  59. Park, C.S., and S.J. Kim. 1996. A Classification of Death Orientation of Cancer Patient’s Family Members : A Q-Methodological Approach. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing 3 (2): 153–169.Google Scholar
  60. Pittard, N., M. Ewing, and C. Jevons. 2007. Aesthetic theory and logo design: examining consumer response to proportion across cultures. International Marketing Review 24 (4): 457–473.Google Scholar
  61. Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903.Google Scholar
  62. Ramlo, S. 2016. Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 10 (1): 28–45.Google Scholar
  63. Rimm-Kaufman, S.E., M.D. Storm, B.E. Sawyer, R.C. Pianta, and K.M. LaParo. 2006. The Teacher Belief Q-Sort: A measure of teachers’ priorities in relation to disciplinary practices, teaching practices, and beliefs about children. Journal of School Psychology 44 (2): 141–165.Google Scholar
  64. Rodriguez, L., S. Lee, and S. Sar. 2016. Schema complexity and valence elicited by country logos for tourism. Journal of Visual Literacy 35 (3): 187–200.Google Scholar
  65. Rosson, P., and M.R. Brooks. 2004. M&As and corporate visual identity: An exploratory study. Corporate Reputation Review 7 (2): 181–194.Google Scholar
  66. Sar, S., L. Rodriguez, S. Lee, and S. Kulpavaropas. 2013. The influence of mood and symbolic value on the evaluation of destination logos. Visual Communication Quarterly 20 (2): 64–74.Google Scholar
  67. Schechter, A.H. 1993. Measuring the value of corporate and brand logos. Design Management Review 4 (1): 33–39.Google Scholar
  68. Schermerhorn, J.R., J.G. Hunt, and R.N. Osborn. 1988. Managing organizational behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  69. Shemmings, D. 2006. ‘Quantifying’qualitative data: An illustrative example of the use of Q methodology in psychosocial research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 147–165.Google Scholar
  70. Smith, P.J. 1990. How to present your firm to the world. Journal of Business Strategy 11 (1): 32–36.Google Scholar
  71. Tavassoli, N.T. 2001. Color memory and evaluations for alphabetical and logographic brand names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 (2): 104–111.Google Scholar
  72. Valenta, A.L., and U. Wigger. 1997. Q-methodology: Definition and application in health care informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 4 (6): 501–510.Google Scholar
  73. Van den Bosch, A.L., M.D. De Jong, and W.J. Elving. 2005. How corporate visual identity supports reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 10 (2): 108–116.Google Scholar
  74. Van der Lans, R., J.A. Cote, C.A. Cole, S.M. Leong, A. Smidts, P.W. Henderson, C. Bluemelhuber, P.A. Bottomley, J.R. Doyle, A. Fedorikhin, and J. Moorthy. 2009. Cross-national logo evaluation analysis: An individual-level approach. Marketing science 28 (5): 968–985.Google Scholar
  75. Van Hooft, S.M., J. Dwarswaard, S. Jedeloo, R. Bal, and A. van Staa. 2015. Four perspectives on self-management support by nurses for people with chronic conditions: A Q-methodological study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 52 (1): 157–166.Google Scholar
  76. Ward, W. 2009. Q and you: The application of Q methodology in recreation research. In Proceedings of the 2009 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, eds. C.E., Watts, and LeBlanc, F., vol. 66, 75–80.Google Scholar
  77. Watts, S., and P. Stenner. 2005. Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative research in psychology 2 (1): 67–91.Google Scholar
  78. Watts, S., and P. Stenner. 2012. Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  79. Wong, W., A.R. Eiser, R.G. Mrtek, and P.S. Heckerling. 2004. By-person factor analysis in clinical ethical decision making: Q methodology in end-of-life care decisions. The American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3): W8–W22.Google Scholar
  80. Zabala, A., and U. Pascual. 2016. Bootstrapping Q methodology to improve the understanding of human perspectives. PLoS ONE 11 (2): 1–19.Google Scholar
  81. Zanoli, R., L. Carlesi, R. Danovaro, S. Mandolesi, and S. Naspetti. 2015. Valuing unfamiliar Mediterranean deep-sea ecosystems using visual Q-methodology. Marine Policy 61: 227–236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Reputation Institute and Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations