Corporate Reputation Review

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Impact of Message Convergence on Organizational Reputation: An Examination of Organizational Crisis Communication on Facebook

  • Lan Ye
  • Eyun-Jung Ki
Original Article


Studies on organizational crisis communication via social media have mainly focused on the effects of messages from one source, organizations. Little is known about the interaction effects of multiple messages from multiple sources through social media on audiences’ perceptions of organizational reputation. Guided by the Message Convergence Framework, this study used a 2 × 2, between-subjects experiment (N = 165) to explore the impact of crisis communication strategies and message convergence on Facebook on audiences’ perceived organizational reputation in a preventable crisis. The results suggest that organizational reputation was affected by the consistency between the organization’s Facebook posts and followers’ comments, and the effects were moderated by the perceived credibility of the comments by Facebook followers. The results also revealed that unlike pre-existing positive attitudes toward an organization, which were negatively affected by inconsistent information on Facebook, pre-existing negative attitudes did not change significantly because of the information on Facebook. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are then discussed.


Crisis communication Organizational reputation Social media User-generated comments Message convergence framework 


  1. Akar, E., and B. Topçu. 2011. An examination of the factors influencing consumers’ attitudes toward social media marketing. Journal of Internet Commerce 10: 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony, K.E., and T.L. Sellnow. 2011. Information acquisition, perception, preference, and convergence by Gulf Coast residents in the aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina crisis. Argumentation and Advocacy 48: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony, K.E., T.L. Sellnow, and A.G. Millner. 2013. Message convergence as a message- centered approach to analyzing and improving risk communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research 41 (4): 346–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coombs, W.T. 1995. Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly 8 (4): 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coombs, W.T. 1998. An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. Journal of Public Relations Research 10 (3): 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coombs, W.T. 2006. The prospective power of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of Promotion Management 12 (3/4): 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coombs, W.T. 2012. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 1996. Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research 8 (4): 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2006. Halo or reputational capital: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management 10 (2): 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dellarocas, C., and R. Narayan. 2006. A statistical measure of a population’s propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statistical Science 21 (2): 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan, D., D. Geddes, and F. Flory. 2013. The Toyota recall crisis: Media impact on Toyotas corporate brand and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 16 (2): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fombrun, C., N.A. Gardberg, and J.M. Sever. 2000. The reputation Quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management 7 (4): 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fombrun, C.J., L.J. Ponzi, and W. Newburry. 2015. Stakeholder tracking and analysis: The RepTrak system for measuring corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 18 (1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fombrun, C.J., and M. Shanley. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayes, D.C., J.A. Hendrix, and P.D. Kumar. 2013. Public relations cases, 9th ed. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  16. Herovic, E., T.L. Sellnow, and K.E. Anthony. 2014. Risk communication as interacting arguments: Viewing the L’Aquila earthquake disaster through the message convergence framework. Argumentation and Advocacy 51: 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holbrook, M.B., and R. Batra. 1987. Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer response to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research 14: 404–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hovland, C.I., and W. Weiss. 1951. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 15 (4): 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelley, H.H. 1973. The processes of causal attribution. American Psychology 28: 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelman, H.C., and C.I. Hovland. 1953. “Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 48 (3): 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerkhof, P., Beugels, D., Utz, S. and Beukeboom, C. (2011) ‘Crisis PR in social media: An experimental study of the effects of organizational crisis responses on Facebook’. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, 26–30 May, Boston.Google Scholar
  22. Mason, A.M. 2014. The impact of media frames and treatment responsibility within the situational crisis communication theory framework. Corporate Reputation Review 17 (1): 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGinnies, E., and C. Ward. 1980. Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6: 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Metzger, M.J., A. Flanagin, K. Eyal, D.R. Lemus, and R.M. McCann. 2003. Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporize environment. Communication Yearbook 27: 293–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muralidharan, S., L. Rasmussen, D. Patterson, and J.-H. Shin. 2011. Hope for Haiti: An analysis of facebook and twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public relations Review 37 (2): 175–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  27. Prabhu, J., and D.W. Stewart. 2001. Signaling strategies in competitive interaction: Building reputations and hiding the truth. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (1): 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rawlins, B. 2008. Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and trust. Public Relations Journal 2 (2): 425–439.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, P., and G. Dowling. 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 23 (12): 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuppen, C.J.S. 1974. Dimensions of communicator credibility: An oblique solution. Speech Monographs 41: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Riel, C.B.M. 2012. The alignment factor: Leveraging the power of total stakeholder support. London and New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  33. Weigelt, K., and C. Camerer. 1988. Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory. Strategic Management Journal 9 (5): 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wigley, S., and W. Zhang. 2011. A study of PR practitioners’ use of social media in crisis planning. Public Relations Journal 5 (3): 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Yoon, E., H.J. Guffey, and V. Kijewski. 1993. The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service. Journal of Business Research 27: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd & Reputation Institute 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communication Studies DepartmentState University of New York at CortlandCortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Advertising and Public Relations, College of Communication and Information SciencesThe University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations