Skip to main content
Log in

Politics as ‘Sinister Wisdom’: Reparation and responsibility in lesbian feminism

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

This article takes up the commonplace antagonism between ‘second wave’ lesbian feminism and ‘third wave’ queer theory and politics, and argues that the antagonism itself is both historically and politically reductive. First, I make the case that ‘third wave’ queer theory actually shares its central concern – namely, accountability for intra-group inequalities – with lesbian feminism. However, I argue that ‘third wave’ queer theories ultimately founder in their bid for a more reflexive political praxis by tending to hold others – lesbian feminists – accountable for ongoing inequalities rather than grappling with them directly. By contrast, I show that lesbian feminists from the late 1970s to the late 1980s developed a reparative politics that succeeds where ‘third wave’ theories stumble by developing relationships of mutual accountability around issues of race and racism, and by establishing processes by which to repair these relationships when they founder. I conclude by arguing that a fuller attention to the history of lesbian feminism, in fact, offers important resources for feminists and queers dealing with issues of intra-group marginalization, such as transphobia, in the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, S. et al. (2018) Derogatory Language in Philosophy Journal Risks Increased Hostility and Diminished Discussion. The Daily Nous. Retreived from http://dailynous.com/2018/08/27/derogatory-language-philosophy-journal-hostility-discussion/#Sosa.

  • Bettcher, T. and Garry, A. (2009) Introduction: Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities. Hypatia 24(3): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkin, E. (1980) Racism and Writing: Some Implications for White Lesbian Critics. Sinister Wisdom 13: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkin, E., Pratt, M.B. and Smith, B. (1984) Yours in Struggle: Three Perspectives on Anti-Semitism and Racism. New York: Long Haul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, A. (2002) In the Archives of Lesbian Feelings: Documentary and Popular Culture. Camera Obscura 48(17): 107–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lauretis, T. (1990) Eccentric Subjects: Feminist Theory and Historical Consciousness. Feminist Studies 16(1): 115–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lauretis, T. (1994) Practices of Love: Lesbian Sexuality and Perverse Desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmoines, H. (1976) Notes for a Magazine. Sinister Wisdom 1: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, D. (1989) Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature, and Difference. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eloit, I. and Hemmings, C. (2019) Lesbian Ghosts Feminism: An Introduction. Feminist Theory 20(4): 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, C. (2018) ‘TERF’ War. Inside Higher Ed. Recovered from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/08/29/philosophers-object-journals-publication-terf-reference-some-feminists-it-really.

  • Garber, L. (2001) Identity Poetics: Race, Class, and the Lesbian-Feminist Roots of Queer Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Get the L Out! (2018) Lesbians Protest Pride 2018 [Pamphlet].

  • Get the L Out UK: Lesbian Not Queer (2020) Retrieved from http://www.gettheloutuk.com/.

  • Hesford, V. (2013) Feeling Women’s Liberation. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. (1996) Difference, Dilemmas, and the Politics of Home. In S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Koyama, E. (2001, July 26) The Transfeminist Manifesto [Blog Post]. Retrieved from https://eminism.org/readings/pdf-rdg/tfmanifesto.pdf.

  • Koyama, E. (2006) Whose Feminism is it Anyway? The Unspoken Racism of the Inclusion Debate. In S. Stryker and S. Whittle (eds.) The Transgender Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 698-705.

  • Kramer, S. (2017) Excluded Within: The (Un)Intelligibility of Radical Political Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • L’Amour, L. (July 9, 2018) Lesbians Join the Fight Against TERFs in a Social Media Campaign After UK Pride was Hijacked. Them Retrieved from https://www.them.us/story/lesbians-join-the-fightagainst-terfs.

  • Lorde, A. (2007 [1984]) Sister Outsider. Berkeley: Crossing Press.

  • Love, H. (2007) Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (1993) Lesbian Identity and Autobiographical Difference[s]. In H. Abelove, M. Barale and D. Halperin (eds.) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 274-293.

  • Moraga, C. and Anzaldúa, G. (eds.) (1983 [1981]) This Bridge Called my Back. New York: Kitchen Table Press.

  • Murib, Z. (2017) Rethinking GLBT as a Political Category in U.S. Politics. In M. Brettschneider, S. Burgess and C. Keating (eds.) LGBTQ Politics: A Critical Reader. New York: NYU Press.

  • Reagon, Bernice Johnson. (2000 [1983]) Coalition Politics: Turning the Century. Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology, ed. Barbara Smith. New York: Kitchen Table Press, 356-368.

  • Rich, A. (1983) Notes for a Magazine: What does Separatism Mean? Sinister Wisdom 18: 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. (1988) Am I That Name? Feminism and the Category of ‘Woman’ in History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowling, J.K. (2020) JK Rowling Writes About Her Reasons for Speaking out on Sex and Gender Issues. Retrieved from https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/.

  • Rubin, G. (1984) Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In C.S. Vance (ed.) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Rubin, G. (1997) Sexual Traffic: An Interview with Judith Butler. In N. Schor and E. Weed (eds.) Feminism Meets Queer Theory. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, pp. 68-108.

  • Scott, J. (2008) Introduction: Feminism’s Critical Edge. Women’s Studies on the Edge. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Scott, J. (2011) The Fantasy of Feminist History. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and Smith, B. (1983) Across the Kitchen Table: A Sister-to-Sister Dialogue. Sinister Wisdom 18: 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. and Wittle, S. (eds.) (2006) The Transgender Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M.U. (2013) Moral Vulnerability and the Task of Reparations. In C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers and S. Dodds (eds.) Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 110-131.

  • Watson, J. (2013) Feminism as Agonistic Sorority: An Interview with Bonnie Honig. Minnesota Review 81: 102–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegman, R. (2012) Object Lessons. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, L. (2005) Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Nancy Luxon and Joan Tronto for their generous engagement with this argument from its earliest inception. Thanks also go to the various discussants and interlocutors of this piece over the course of several years, including Michaele Ferguson and Delia Popescu, and to the Association for Political Theory’s mentoring committee for supporting and soliciting feedback on an early draft. Finally, thank you to the anonymous reviewers at CPT and to editor Lisa Disch, whose feedback on this article has been invaluable in shaping and honing my argument.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Gambino.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gambino, E. Politics as ‘Sinister Wisdom’: Reparation and responsibility in lesbian feminism. Contemp Polit Theory 20, 524–546 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00457-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00457-7

Keywords

Navigation