Skip to main content
Log in

Radical democracy and left populism after the squares: ‘Social Movement’ (Ukraine), Podemos (Spain), and the question of organization

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

This article begins with a theoretical tension. Radical democracy, in the joint work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, can be understood as a joint articulation of a post-foundational ontology of contingency and a politics of autonomy of ‘democratic struggles’ within a hegemonic bloc as loci of antagonisms in their own right, while Laclau’s theory of populism marks a shift from the autonomy of struggles to the representative function of the empty signifier as a constitutive dimension. This tension between a horizontal logic of autonomy and a vertical logic of representation comes to the fore not least in the manifold attempts to combine radical-democratic and (left-)populist practices in the wake of the ‘movements of the squares.’ This argument is illustrated empirically in the cases of two party projects situating themselves in contexts of social protest—‘Social Movement’ in Ukraine and Podemos in Spain—both of which seek to combine a left-populist discursive strategy with some form of radical-democratic politics of autonomy, either by supporting local alliances independent from the party (Podemos) or by integrating trade union representatives into the organizational center, which in turn finds expression in a representative logic (‘Social Movement’).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arditi, B. (2005). Populism as an internal periphery of democratic politics. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 72–98). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, B. (2007). Post-hegemony: Politics outside the usual post-Marxist paradigm. Contemporary Politics,13, 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, B. (2010). Populism is hegemony is politics? On Ernesto Laclau’s On Populist Reason. Constellations,17, 488–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley-Murray, J. (2010). Posthegemony: Political Theory and Latin America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, M. (2011). Mechanisms of Maidan: The structure of contingency in the making of the Orange Revolution. Mobilization,16, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (2004). Is there a normative deficit in the theory of hegemony? In S. Critchley & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A critical reader (pp. 113–122). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (2005). Gramsci is dead: Anarchist currents in the newest social movements. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., et al. (2017). Movement parties against austerity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Democratic Initiatives Foundation. (2014). Biд Maйдaнy-тaбopy дo Maйдaнy-ciчi: щo змiнилocя? Retrieved from http://dif.org.ua/article/vid-maydanu-taboru-do-maydanu-sichi-shcho-zminilosya.

  • Eklundh, E. (2016). El soberano fantasmático: Las implicaciones políticas de la apropriación de Laclau por parte de Podemos. Relaciones Internacionales,31, 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Heraldo. (2017). Fachin pide suspender la consulta “impuesta” por Iglesias a Podem. Retrieved from http://www.heraldo.es/noticias/nacional/2017/11/03/fachin-pide-suspender-consulta-impuesta-por-iglesias-podem-1205577-305.html.

  • Errejón, Í. and Mouffe, C. (2015). Construir pueblo. Hegemonía y radicalización de la democracia. Barcelona: Icaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2017). The mask and the flag: Populism, citizenism and global protest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2012). Declaration. New York: Argo-Navis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. and Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In D. Howarth, A. Norval, & Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change (pp. 1–23). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hromadske Radio. (2016). Зaвoди нapoдy!—coцiaлicти пpoвeли cвoю “мaïвкy”. Retrieved from https://hromadskeradio.org/news/2016/05/01/zavody-narodu-socialisty-provely-svoyu-mayivku.

  • Iglesias, P. (2015a). Understanding Podemos. New Left,93, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, P. (2015b). Spain on edge. New Left Review,93, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • InfoLibre. (2015). Bescansa a los críticos: “Hay un Podemos para ganar y otro para protestar”. Retrieved from https://www.infolibre.es/noticias/politica/2015/01/19/bescansa_hay_podemos_para_ganar_otro_para_protestar_26979_1012.html.

  • Ishchenko, V. (2014). Ukraine’s fractures. New Left Review,87, 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishchenko, A. (2016). Зaявa пpo виxiд Плaтфopми зaxиcтy poбiтничoгo клacy (ПЗPК) з opгкoмiтeтy пapтiï “Coцiaльний pyx” вiд 13.07.2016 poкy. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/andishchenko/photos/a.1061810610575095/1066152263474263/?type=3&theater.

  • Kim, S. (2017). The populism of the Alternative for Germany (AfD): An extended Essex School perspective. Palgrave Communications,3(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0008-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kioupkiolis, A. (2016). Podemos: The ambiguous promises of left-wing populism in contemporary Spain. Journal of Political Ideologies,21, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kioupkiolis, A. (2018). Commoning the political, politicizing the common: Community and the political in Jean-Luc Nancy, Roberto Esposito and Giorgio Agamben. Contemporary Political Theory,17, 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kioupkiolis, A. and Katsambekis, G. (Eds.). (2014). Radical democracy and collective movements today: The biopolitics of the multitude versus the hegemony of the people. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996/2007a). Why do empty signifiers matter to politics? In Emancipation(s) (pp. 36–46). London: Verso.

  • Laclau, E. (1996/2007b). Subject of politics, politics of the subject. In Emancipation(s) (pp. 47–65). London: Verso.

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2014). The rhetorical foundations of society. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2015). An interview with Ernesto Laclau. In D. Howarth (Ed.), Ernesto Laclau: Post- Marxism, populism and critique (pp. 257–271). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985/2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.

  • La Marea. (2015). Discurso íntegro de Pablo Iglesias en la Puerta del Sol. Retrieved from https://www.lamarea.com/2015/02/04/discurso-integro-de-pablo-iglesias-en-la-puerta-del-sol/.

  • Lefort, C. (1986). The political forms of modern society: Bureaucracy, democracy, totalitarianism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and political theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Left Opposition. (2011). Maнiфecт. Retrieved from http://gaslo.info/?page_id=2.

  • Left Opposition. (2013) Плaн coцiaльниx змiн: 10 пyнктiв (пpoeкт). Retrieved from http://gaslo.info/?p=4748.

  • Left Opposition. (2014). 7 вepecня: oбгoвopeння “лiвa пapтiя: як i нaвiщo?” Retrieved from http://gaslo.info/?p=5419.

  • Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational political thought: Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marchart, O. (2017). Die Diskursanalyse der Essex School. Modell und Methode. In O. Marchart (Ed.), Ordnungen des Politischen. Einsätze und Wirkungen der Hegemonietheorie Ernesto Laclaus (pp. 57–80). Wiesbaden: Springer.

  • Marchart, O. (2018). Thinking antagonism: Political ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, T. (2015). Post-foundational discourse analysis: From political difference to empirical research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. (2014). “The people must be extracted from within the people”: Reflections on populism. Constellations,21, 483–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonhoff, M. (2006). Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie. Das Project “Soziale Marktwirschaft”. Bielefeld: Transcript.

  • Nonhoff, M. (2017). Antagonismus und Antagonismen—hegemonietheoretische Aufklärung. In O. Marchart (Ed.), Ordnungen des Politischen. Einsätze und Wirkungen der Hegemonietheorie Ernesto Laclaus (pp. 81–102). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popova, M. (2014). Why the Orange Revolution was short and peaceful and Euromaidan long and violent. Problems of Post-Communism,61, 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovych, Z. (2015). Maйдaн—цe cвiдoцтвo aбcoлютнoï opгaнизaцiйнoï нeздaтнocтi лiвиx. Commons: Journal of Social Criticism (Cпiльнe), 9, 104–113.

  • Portnov, A. (2015). Ukraine ohne Donbass? Der galizische Reduktionismus und seine Wurzeln. Valerio,17, 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentoulis, M. and Thomassen, L. (2013). Political theory in the square: Protest, representation and subjectification. Contemporary Political Theory,12, 166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Público. (2014). Pablo Iglesias presenta Podemos como “un método participativo abierto a toda la ciudadanía”. Retrieved from http://www.publico.es/politica/pablo-iglesias-presenta-metodo-participativo.html.

  • Rendueles, C. and Sola, J. (2018). The rise of Podemos: Promises, constraints, and dilemmas. In Ó. García Augustín & M. Briziarelli (Eds.), Podemos and the new political cycle: Left-wing populism and anti-establishment politics (pp. 25–47). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. (2011). The politics of protest in hybrid regimes: Managing dissent in post- communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, E. and López, I. (2015) Podemos, el voto pragmático. Contexto y Acción. Retrieved from http://ctxt.es/es/20151216/Firmas/3423/20D-elecciones-generales-Podemos-PSOE-15M.htm.

  • Roskamm, N. (2017). Annäherungen an das Außen. Laclau, die Stadt und der Raum. In: O. Marchart (Ed.), Ordnungen des Politischen. Einsätze und Wirkungen der Hegemonietheorie Ernesto Laclaus (pp. 145–167). Wiesbaden: Springer.

  • Russian Socialist Movement. (2015). “Coцiaльний pyx” пpoтив “yкpaинcкoй вepcии пyтинизмa.” Retrieved from http://anticapitalist.ru/archive/analiz/v_mire/%C2%ABsocz%D1%96alnij_rux%C2%BB_protiv_ukrainskoj_versii_putinizma.html.

  • Shapinov, V. (2006). Heт бoльшe cтaлинизмa и тpoцкизмa, ecть peвoлюциoнный мapкcизм и peфopмизм. Retrieved via Wayback Machine from https://web.archive.org/web/20070203124127/http://www.communist.ru:80/root/archive/theory/stalinism.trotskyism.

  • Sitrin, M. and Azzellini, D. (2014). They can’t represent us! Reinventing democracy from Greece to Occupy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Movement. (2014). Пpoгpaмнa зaявa opгкoмiтeтy пapтii “Coцiaльний pyx” (пpoeкт). Retrieved from http://rev.org.ua/programna-zayava/.

  • Social Movement. (2015). Плaн coцiaльниx змiн. Retrieved from http://rev.org.ua/12-punktiv/.

  • Stavrakakis, Y. and Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies,19, 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y., et al. (2017). Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: Revisiting a reified association. Critical Discourse Studies,14, 420–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, L. (2005). Antagonism, hegemony and ideology after heterogeneity. Journal of Political Ideologies,10, 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, L. (2016). Hegemony, populism and democracy: Laclau and Mouffe today. Revista Española de Ciencia Política,40, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønder, L. and Thomassen, L. (2005). Introduction: Rethinking radical democracy between abundance and lack. In L. Tønder & L. Thomassen (Eds.), Radical Democracy: Politics between abundance and lack (pp. 1–13). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unidos Podemos. (2016). “Cambio político en España.” Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=henT99-53nc.

  • Valdivielso, J. (2017). The outraged people. Laclau, Mouffe and the Podemos hypothesis. Constellations,24, 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga, M. (2012). “Working-class heresies”: Ideology in protests of Ukrainian workers during the world economic crisis 2009-2012. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe,20, 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelik, R. (2015a). Institutionalisierung von PODEMOS oder Rückkehr der Demokratisierungsbewegungen? Eine Analyse der Wahlen in Spanien. Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung. Retrieved from https://www.raulzelik.net/baskenland-texte/472-institutionalisierung-von-podemos-oder-rueckkehr-der-demokratisierungsbewegungen-eine-analyse-der-wahlen-in-spanien-standpunkte-rosa-luxemburg-stiftung-21-dezember-2015.

  • Zelik, R. (2015b). Mit PODEMOS zur demokratischen Revolution? Krise und Aufbruch in Spanien. Berlin: Bertz and Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuravlev, O. (2015). Пoлитикa пoдлиннocти и eё пpeдeлы. Commons: Journal of Social Criticism (Cпiльнe) 9. Retrieved from http://commons.com.ua/uk/politika-podlinnosti/.

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author expresses his sincere thanks to Aristotelis Agridopoulos, Martin Nonhoff, Jakob Schultz, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seongcheol Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S. Radical democracy and left populism after the squares: ‘Social Movement’ (Ukraine), Podemos (Spain), and the question of organization. Contemp Polit Theory 19, 211–232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00343-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00343-x

Keywords

Navigation