Has liberalism ruined everything?
There has been considerable recent discussion of the social effects of “liberalism,” which are said to include a growth in out-of-wedlock childbirth, repudiation of traditions (religious and otherwise), a rise in populism, increased reliance on technocracy, inequality, environmental degradation, sexual promiscuity, deterioration of civic associations, a diminution of civic virtue, political correctness on university campuses, and a general sense of alienation. There is good reason for skepticism about these claims. Liberalism is not a person, and it is not an agent in history. Claims about the supposedly adverse social effects of liberalism are best taken not as causal claims at all, but as normative objections that should be defended on their merits. These propositions are elaborated with reference to three subordinate propositions: (1) liberalism, as such, does not lack the resources to defend traditions; (2) liberalism, as such, hardly rejects the idea of “constraint,” though the domains in which liberals accept constraints differ from those of antiliberals, and vary over time; (3) liberalism, as such, does not dishonor the idea of “honor.” There is a general point here about the difficulty of demonstrating, and the potential recklessness of claiming, that one or another “ism” is causally associated with concrete social developments.
Keywordsliberalism causal explanation freedom promiscuity
This essay grows out of a commentary on the Vaughn Lecture at Harvard Law School, delivered in March 2019 by Yoram Hazony, titled “A Confederacy of Prodigies: On the Ascending of Reason and the Extinction of Conservatism in America,” and posted here: https://americanmind.org/essays/conservative-rationalism-has-failed/. For their immense generosity and graciousness on the occasion, the author is grateful to Dr. Hazony, Jack Goldsmith, also a commenter at the event, and Mary Ann Glendon, the organizer of the event, with particular thanks to Hazony for his kindness. Special thanks, too, to Goldsmith, Martha Nussbaum, Lisa Disch, and two anonymous reviewers for superb comments on an earlier draft, and to Ethan Lowens for excellent research assistance. Readers are asked to make allowances for broad, brief, and somewhat informal remarks on some very large topics.
- Bentham, J. (1952) Handbook of Political Fallacies. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
- Brokow, T. (1998) The Greatest Generation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Burke, E. (1999) Reflections on the revolution in France. In: I. Kramnick (ed.) The Portable Edmund Burke. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, R. (1985) Law’s Empire. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Elster, J. (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hayek, F. (1984) The origins and effects of our morals: A problem for science. In: C. Nishiyama and K. Leube (eds.) The Essence of Hayek. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Hazony, Y. (2018) The Virtue of Nationalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Hazony, Y. (2019) Conservative Rationalism Has Failed, https://americanmind.org/essays/conservative-rationalism-has-failed/, accessed 29 July 2019.
- Hirschmann, A. (1977) The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Hogan, J. (2018) ‘The Problems of Liberalism: A Q&A With Patrick Deneen’. The Nation, https://www.thenation.com/article/the-problems-of-liberalism-a-qa-with-patrick-deneen/, accessed 29 July 2019.
- Holmes, S. (1984) Benjamin Constant and the Making of Modern Liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Holmes, S. (1995) Passions and Constraint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Julian, K. (2018) Why are young people having so little sex? The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/12/the-sex-recession/573949/, accessed 29 July 2019.
- Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Mill, J.S. (2002) On liberty. In: The Basic Writings of John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, the Subjection of Women, and Utilitarianism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Pascal, B. (1910) Preface to the treatise on vacuum. In: C.W. Elliot (ed.) Thoughts, Letters, and Minor Works, Translated by M.L. Booth et al. New York: P.F. Collier & Son.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1985) Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs 14(3): 223–251.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Raz, J. (1987) Autonomy, toleration, and the harm principle. In: R. Gavison (ed.) Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2018) Liberalism, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/, accessed 29 July 2019.
- Sunstein, C.R. (2007) Due process traditionalism. Michigan Law Review 106(8): 1543–1570.Google Scholar
- Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977) The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wood G. (1991) The Radicalism of the American Revolution. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar